Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Health and Fitness

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-12-2009, 07:54 PM   #1
996GT2
Diamond Member
 
996GT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,783
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Every workout website I read advocates doing full reps (touching chest on bench, going past 90 deg on squat...etc), but my friend who works out a lot says that his training is focused on doing half reps, especially at the higher weights

He weighs 135 lbs, and on bench press he can full-rep 225 lbs. His training is a little strange, though:

On the bench press, his training goes something like:
135x6 full rep
155z4 full rep
185x4 full rep
205x2 full rep
215x2 full rep
225x2 half rep
245x4 half rep
265x6 half rep
265x6 half rep
285x6 half rep
305x2 half rep
135 x 22 full rep

What are the advantages of doing this as opposed to something like Stronglifts 5x5, where you are only doing 5 sets of full reps?
__________________
Heatware

Core i7-2700K @ 5.0 GHz, 1.38V (HT on) | Maximus IV GENE-Z
4x4GB Samsung 30nm @ DDR3-2133 | Asus GTX 670
Plextor M3 | 2x WD Black 1TB |Xonar DX
Silverstone SG09 | Seasonic X-750
996GT2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 09:26 PM   #2
SlitheryDee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

I dunno, but it sounds like an excuse to load up on heavier weights than he can really do...

Him: "Oh, yeah I can bench 305".

Me: *looks at tiny skinny 135lb dude*

Me: "Uh huh"

Benching 225 "the right way" is pretty damn good for a guy that small though. Maybe the half-reps contribute to that, but I honestly think his time would be better spent doing whatever weight he can do with a full range of motion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 09:48 PM   #3
SociallyChallenged
Elite
 
SociallyChallenged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,484
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

It's like doing rack pulls with deadlifts. A limited range of motion can sometimes strengthen the weak parts of a movement and allow for greater overall weight to be used. However, focusing on bench like that is pretty awkward. He probably would've moved quicker on his weights initially on a linear program though. This would be for more advanced users, which he seems to be approaching nowadays (225 at 135 is pretty impressive). Are you sure he can do 225 for a full 1RM?
__________________
I am a doctor of physical therapy. Information I provide is based on subjective report alone. This frequently results in speculation and, as a result, may not always be accurate. Thus I am not liable for any action taken based on information provided.

Now offering physical therapy consultation services via Skype, e-mail, and phone. Please PM me for details.
SociallyChallenged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 09:59 PM   #4
crt1530
Diamond Member
 
crt1530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,198
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Your friend has no idea what he's doing.
__________________
Save 5% on your TrueProtein.com order with discount code CST815
crt1530 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:31 PM   #5
Kipper
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,366
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Twelve sets flat bench press?

Reminds me of my "arms day" back when I started and had no idea what I was doing. I'd do something like 20 sets for biceps, 20 sets triceps...
Kipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 10:41 PM   #6
996GT2
Diamond Member
 
996GT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,783
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Are you sure he can do 225 for a full 1RM?
Yes, I've seen it before, which is why I was so impressed.

He also does every bodyweight exercise with a ton of weights piled on. I think he adds 55 pounds of plates to his body for dips and something like 45-50 for pull-ups. Crazy stuff.
__________________
Heatware

Core i7-2700K @ 5.0 GHz, 1.38V (HT on) | Maximus IV GENE-Z
4x4GB Samsung 30nm @ DDR3-2133 | Asus GTX 670
Plextor M3 | 2x WD Black 1TB |Xonar DX
Silverstone SG09 | Seasonic X-750
996GT2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 01:59 AM   #7
RESmonkey
Diamond Member
 
RESmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,817
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
__________________

RESmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 02:03 AM   #8
SociallyChallenged
Elite
 
SociallyChallenged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,484
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
Yep, they're awesome until you go too far and fail with weights beyond 1RM. 305 dropped on your chest sounds like a rip-roarin' time
__________________
I am a doctor of physical therapy. Information I provide is based on subjective report alone. This frequently results in speculation and, as a result, may not always be accurate. Thus I am not liable for any action taken based on information provided.

Now offering physical therapy consultation services via Skype, e-mail, and phone. Please PM me for details.
SociallyChallenged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 02:39 AM   #9
Howard
Lifer
 
Howard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 47,227
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Quote:
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
Yep, they're awesome until you go too far and fail with weights beyond 1RM. 305 dropped on your chest sounds like a rip-roarin' time
Ribs heal fast. *shrug*
__________________
mugs, Crono for Elite

Kitchen stuff
Howard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 11:37 AM   #10
brikis98
Diamond Member
 
brikis98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 7,254
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

If you're training to be a competitive powerlifter, where the aim is to lift the maximum weight possible, partial reps can be a very useful tool to complement full reps. Partial reps allow your muscles, bones, tissues and CNS to get used to handling heavier weights and can help strengthen certain parts of the full movement. For example, if you struggle locking out the weight in deadlift, doing rack pulls can be a very helpful assistance exercise.

On the other hand, if you're training for functional strength (ie, general fitness), partial reps tend to be much less useful. In general strength training, the goal is not really to lift the maximum weight, but to become as (functionally) strong as possible. While the two goals are related, they are not the same. For example, training to squat the maximum weight typically leads people to use a very wide squat stance. However, squatting to become as strong as possible typically uses a narrower, more athletic stance, as that tends to produce strength that carries over better to real world activities. You can squat more weight with a wide stance, but you build more functional strength with a narrow stance.

In general, exercises that improve real world performance, aka "functional exercises", have the characteristic that they allow you to move large loads over long distances quickly. Full reps of compound exercises like the squat, deadlift, press, clean, etc fit this definition beautifully. Partial rep exercises allow very large loads to be moved, but not particularly quickly and, by definition, not for very long distances. In short, if you're doing general strength training, full ROM is typically the way to go.
__________________
Heatware | Rig | Twitter | Homepage

“…what a disgrace it would be for a man to grow old without ever seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.” - Socrates
brikis98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 11:54 PM   #11
Capt Caveman
Lifer
 
Capt Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 31,384
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Quote:
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
Yep, they're awesome until you go too far and fail with weights beyond 1RM. 305 dropped on your chest sounds like a rip-roarin' time
Except you'll have a spotter and more than likely the drop will be slow and close to your chest.
__________________
Adopt a Homeless Pet
Capt Caveman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 01:47 AM   #12
SociallyChallenged
Elite
 
SociallyChallenged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,484
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Quote:
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Quote:
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
Yep, they're awesome until you go too far and fail with weights beyond 1RM. 305 dropped on your chest sounds like a rip-roarin' time
Except you'll have a spotter and more than likely the drop will be slow and close to your chest.
If he's doing 305 for two and goes too far the second rep, the spotter better be able to curl well over 100 pounds because after all that work, he's gonna fail hard. Also, the drop - it's not called a half rep because it gets close to your chest.
__________________
I am a doctor of physical therapy. Information I provide is based on subjective report alone. This frequently results in speculation and, as a result, may not always be accurate. Thus I am not liable for any action taken based on information provided.

Now offering physical therapy consultation services via Skype, e-mail, and phone. Please PM me for details.
SociallyChallenged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 08:48 AM   #13
RapidSnail
Diamond Member
 
RapidSnail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In your neoplasms, destroyin' your metastasis.
Posts: 4,258
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Is he doing partials in the lower half or upper half?
RapidSnail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 12:02 PM   #14
SociallyChallenged
Elite
 
SociallyChallenged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,484
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Is he doing partials in the lower half or upper half?
The bottom part of the ROM is usually the weakest so I doubt he's doing 305 from chest to halfway up. I imagine it's from fully extended to halfway down, not getting anywhere near his chest).
__________________
I am a doctor of physical therapy. Information I provide is based on subjective report alone. This frequently results in speculation and, as a result, may not always be accurate. Thus I am not liable for any action taken based on information provided.

Now offering physical therapy consultation services via Skype, e-mail, and phone. Please PM me for details.
SociallyChallenged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 01:15 PM   #15
Capt Caveman
Lifer
 
Capt Caveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 31,384
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

nvm
__________________
Adopt a Homeless Pet
Capt Caveman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 04:59 PM   #16
presidentender
Golden Member
 
presidentender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,168
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

So y'all have changed your minds?
__________________
I write software and they pay me for it. Luckier than Lou Gehrig, I am.
presidentender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 05:45 AM   #17
gramboh
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,207
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

It's perfectly legit for advanced lifters trying to focus on certain parts of the movement, but I don't like the way he is using them for such a long weight range, 225-305. He is obviously strong if he can bench 225 @ 135 but I think he'd get more bang for his buck doing 3's and 1's full range trying for progressive overloading.

It's like this guy I know who deadlifts something around 225 (I think he weighs 190ish) and regularly does rack pulls around 300lbs. What's the effing point of rack pulls until you have at least 2x BW deadlift, other than trying to look big int he gym, it's just a stupid waste of time and overcomplicating your training.
__________________
vancouver - canada
i7 3770K @ 4.5GHz 1.2V + Noctua NH-D14
Asus P8Z77-V Pro + 16GB Mushkin DDR3-1600 (4x4GB)
Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Windforce + Dell 2407WFP A04
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB SSD + 6TB HDD storage
Corsair 550D + Seasonic X-760
Win 7 Pro SP1 x64
gramboh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:10 AM   #18
Koing
Elite Member
Super Moderator
Health and Fitness Moderator
 
Koing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: England
Posts: 16,930
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Quote:
Originally posted by: Howard
Quote:
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Quote:
Originally posted by: RESmonkey
/facepalm

I usually don't browse this place, but just hopped in on this thread. Half reps (especially at weights beyond 1RM) or even negative reps definitely help. Gets your muscles/nervous system used to heavier loads.
Yep, they're awesome until you go too far and fail with weights beyond 1RM. 305 dropped on your chest sounds like a rip-roarin' time
Ribs heal fast. *shrug*
hehe you should see how I bench press then

He isn't really doing 12 sets. Anything below 185lbs for him doesn't really count as 'training sets' as the weight is so light. They are warm ups.

There are some merits to half reps like board pressing on the bench press. Some guys do it to help their 'sticking points'.

BUT if he does 'all the time' is half reps then he probably using the half rep range to help him out much or is he even aware of it?!

I see guys in the gym bench pressing but the bar hoovering about 3-5inches off the chest for some bizarre reason .

Koing
__________________
My first Cut
Make a thread in Health and Fitness for related advice
Koing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 09:37 PM   #19
MrMatt
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,911
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

sounds like he's basically doing rack lockouts lol
MrMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 02:42 PM   #20
IceBergSLiM
Lifer
 
IceBergSLiM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: pistol wavin' new haven
Posts: 29,943
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

sounds like a great way to develop injuries
IceBergSLiM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 07:22 PM   #21
Insomniator
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: jersey
Posts: 5,147
Default Full reps vs. Half Reps

Jesus 225 @ 135?!

I can do 205 @.... 175

The best I ever did was I believe 225 @ 165 and I think that was more like half reps anyway.

How the hell do people get so strong...
Insomniator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.