Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Memory and Storage

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2014, 06:07 PM   #1
code65536
Golden Member
 
code65536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,003
Default PNY Optima 240GB SSD uses SandForce

I just bought a PNY Optima 240GB SSD from Newegg ($79 after rebate!).

The price was the main reason behind the purchase, but I was also intrigued by the glowing review at TweakTown.

According to that review, the Optima uses a new controller from SMI (never had heard of them before). Well, it turns out that the Optima that I got came with a SandForce controller instead.

The first thing I noticed was that the firmware version reported by the drive is 541ABBF0, which is the format of SandForce firmware versions. The version printed on the outside of the drive reads "5.4.1" (vs. "N0307A" for the drive in the TT review), and when I applied PNY's 5.6.0 firmware update to this drive, it was with SandForce's firmware updater software.

I ran a simple benchmark (using a 3Gbps SATA-II interface), and the results looked decent (and certainly satisfactory given the price I paid), so at least it doesn't appear to be a V300-style bait-and-switch.
Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

           Sequential Read :   269.245 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   227.531 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   250.157 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   227.649 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    23.207 MB/s [  5665.8 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    43.873 MB/s [ 10711.1 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :    95.683 MB/s [ 23360.1 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   173.737 MB/s [ 42416.3 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [C: 6.4% (14.2/223.1 GB)] (x5)
    OS : Windows 8.1  [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)
But it does pretty much make that TweakTown review irrelevant.
__________________
// C64K / A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

Last edited by code65536; 06-10-2014 at 06:22 PM.
code65536 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2014, 03:10 AM   #2
DominionSeraph
Diamond Member
 
DominionSeraph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Equestria
Posts: 8,261
Default

I have it with the N0307A, also on SATA II. My results:

Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 Shizuku Edition (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

           Sequential Read :   263.395 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   217.186 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   202.314 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   214.565 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    28.233 MB/s [  6892.9 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    82.478 MB/s [ 20136.3 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :   121.876 MB/s [ 29755.0 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   112.558 MB/s [ 27479.9 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [C: 12.3% (24.0/195.3 GB)] (x5)
  Date : 2014/06/13 4:00:31
    OS : Windows XP Professional SP3 [5.1 Build 2600] (x86)
Not terribly different, and can't tell if the difference in random writes would be from hardware or drivers. (I see a decent difference on my machine between Microsoft and Nforce drivers)

I noticed my Atto scores were about half those of the Tweaktown review, though.

(stopped at 64k since it's hitting SATA limit after that)



But my numbers run with the XLR8 Pro, even beating it until 4k.
http://www.custompcreview.com/review...eview/17930/5/
__________________
Danse De Raven

"P&N: Not Quite as Bad as Stormfront"

Last edited by DominionSeraph; 06-13-2014 at 03:57 AM.
DominionSeraph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2014, 11:03 PM   #3
cfendrick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Where and why did you apply PNY's 5.6.0? I can not find any such version on the US PNY site let alone any downloads. I can find a 5.0.7. 5.0.5 and 5.0.4 from http://pny.eu/s/d/Downloads/PNY/. Did you maybe mean 5.0.6? Why would you not apply the 5.0.7 as this is the newest release.


Do you have links and steps to the downloads you used would you mind trying 5.0.7 and do bench marks after the firmware to see if there is a difference in performance. I assume that flashing a different firmware will void any warranty. Do they make a tool to back the current version as the Optima series of SSD's do not have any downloads available that I can find.

Looking at the internal parts and benchmarks the sandforce controller in the optima looks pretty good bang for your buck.
http://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/com...ecided_to_buy/
cfendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2014, 11:15 PM   #4
code65536
Golden Member
 
code65536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfendrick View Post
Where and why did you apply PNY's 5.6.0? I can not find any such version on the US PNY site let alone any downloads. I can find a 5.0.7. 5.0.5 and 5.0.4 from http://pny.eu/s/d/Downloads/PNY/. Did you maybe mean 5.0.6? Why would you not apply the 5.0.7 as this is the newest release.


Do you have links and steps to the downloads you used would you mind trying 5.0.7 and do bench marks after the firmware to see if there is a difference in performance. I assume that flashing a different firmware will void any warranty. Do they make a tool to back the current version as the Optima series of SSD's do not have any downloads available that I can find.

Looking at the internal parts and benchmarks the sandforce controller in the optima looks pretty good bang for your buck.
http://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/com...ecided_to_buy/
That's strange--it looks like they removed the links to the firmware. But the direct link to the firmware file still works (as of the time of this post).
__________________
// C64K / A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.
code65536 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2014, 11:54 PM   #5
cfendrick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks for the files. Firmware Revision: 5.6.0 looks legit and I'll be updating shortly. Great find in having the direct download link.

Miscellaneous new Flash families are added and supported in this release. They have successfully completed our SQA testing.
New Features and Enhancements: Description Enabled additional SMART log support.

I think I am ready to do some testing tomorrow.
cfendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 01:41 PM   #6
cfendrick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Default

I purchased the PNY Optima 240GB SSD from TigerDirect on 6/18/2014 (Price was 109.99 with a 20 rebate = $89 after rebate).

The price was the main reason behind the purchase and I didn't do any real research ect prior to the purchase. After doing some research with drive in hand I'm now postng here. As it turns out the Optima that I have also came with a SandForce controller. This isn't my first SSD as I also have purchased and currently still use 2 M500 240gb, 1 M500 480GB, 1 Kingston Hyper X 120gb, and 1 Toshiba Q Series Pro 256.

I ran a simple benchmark on both (3Gbps SATA-II interface) and (6Gbps SATA-III interface). I provided benchmarks for each firmware using 3 different tools and the results are more than decent and I am certainly happy with my purchase. Assuming the quality is there and it lasts 2 to 3 years in my opinion it will be well worth having the controller that it came with.

Stock machine was a Dell Optiplex 790, i5-2500 with 12GB ram
Windows 7 Enterprise with all current updates

Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.4.1 using a Sata II connection


Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.4.1 using a Sata III connection


Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.6.0 using a Sata II connection


Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.6.0 using a Sata III connection
cfendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 01:49 PM   #7
cfendrick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.6.0 using a Sata III connection
Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
           Sequential Read :   489.227 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   261.295 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   427.101 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   260.581 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    27.103 MB/s [  6616.8 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    78.988 MB/s [ 19284.2 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :   104.867 MB/s [ 25602.2 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   230.972 MB/s [ 56389.7 IOPS]
  Test : 1000 MB [D: 0.0% (0.1/223.6 GB)] (x4)
  Date : 2014/07/02 12:30:57
    OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
Optima 240GB SSD on Firmware 5.6.0 using a Sata II connection
Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
           Sequential Read :   269.107 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   228.324 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   251.323 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   227.574 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    24.959 MB/s [  6093.5 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    58.506 MB/s [ 14283.8 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :    97.996 MB/s [ 23924.7 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   184.031 MB/s [ 44929.5 IOPS]
  Test : 1000 MB [D: 0.0% (0.1/223.6 GB)] (x4)
  Date : 2014/07/02 12:51:22
    OS : Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

Last edited by cfendrick; 07-02-2014 at 02:23 PM.
cfendrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2014, 08:25 PM   #8
802D
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Default Tweaktown no longer recommends the PNY Optima

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/64...sed/index.html

"There is a large performance difference between the SMI Optima and the SandForce Optima"
802D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 01:56 PM   #9
Schmide
Diamond Member
 
Schmide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,260
Default

Woo Hoo Mine has a N0307A firmware. Eat it suckers.

Still kindo lame PNY
__________________
All errors are undocumented features waiting to be discovered.
Schmide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 07:58 AM   #10
coredump4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Default

The PNY 5.6.0 download link is dead now. Any alternative download locations?

TIA
coredump4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 11:09 AM   #11
blastingcap
Diamond Member
 
blastingcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by code65536 View Post
I just bought a PNY Optima 240GB SSD from Newegg ($79 after rebate!).

The price was the main reason behind the purchase, but I was also intrigued by the glowing review at TweakTown.

According to that review, the Optima uses a new controller from SMI (never had heard of them before). Well, it turns out that the Optima that I got came with a SandForce controller instead.

The first thing I noticed was that the firmware version reported by the drive is 541ABBF0, which is the format of SandForce firmware versions. The version printed on the outside of the drive reads "5.4.1" (vs. "N0307A" for the drive in the TT review), and when I applied PNY's 5.6.0 firmware update to this drive, it was with SandForce's firmware updater software.

I ran a simple benchmark (using a 3Gbps SATA-II interface), and the results looked decent (and certainly satisfactory given the price I paid), so at least it doesn't appear to be a V300-style bait-and-switch.
Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

           Sequential Read :   269.245 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   227.531 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   250.157 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   227.649 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    23.207 MB/s [  5665.8 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    43.873 MB/s [ 10711.1 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :    95.683 MB/s [ 23360.1 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   173.737 MB/s [ 42416.3 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [C: 6.4% (14.2/223.1 GB)] (x5)
    OS : Windows 8.1  [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)
But it does pretty much make that TweakTown review irrelevant.
I haven't read the other posts in this thread so forgive me if I'm redundant, but once I read that PNY Optimas can have pretty much any crappy controller up to and including JMicron (although so far PNY seems to have not actually done that, the mere fact that they reserved the right to switch the controller to JMicron made me shudder), I steered clear of the OBVIOUS bait-and-switch trap. This is like Kingston switching NAND in the middle of their SSD production run without changing the product number, but PNY/Newegg did post a warning that they could switch suppliers for this SSD's controller, thus PNY wasn't quite as underhanded as Kingston.

http://techreport.com/review/26664/a...ny-ssd-boycott

P.S. For the last several years I have always recommended buying SSDs from companies that produce their own NAND and SSDs with known controllers. I'd also add to that group enterprise drives and Plextor (which has to date not cost-cut in objectionable ways). This is because the market was obviously going to shake out as margins compressed, and companies that make their own NAND held a big survival advantage. My order of preference if price were no concern:

1. Intel (they were the ones who fixed Sandforce's controller; and their QA process is perhaps the most intense in the business http://techreport.com/review/26269/b...ssd-division/3 so I have no worries about Intel NAND quality at all)
2. Crucial/Micron (tie, a few hiccups in M4 firmware that had to be updated, but not a bad of a record overall)
2. Samsung (tie, few hiccups and make some of the highest-quality NAND on market)
4. Sandisk/Toshiba (only if recent ones, not their Sandforce-based ones with TRIM and other problems; pure-Toshiba not really in retail market but Sandisk/Toshiba share NAND fabrication facilities)
5. Hynix (not available via retail, closest you are going to get is via Seagate 600 series and Corsair's LAMD-based SSDs)
----------small dropoff here; everyone above this line makes their own NAND----------
6. Plextor (just a reseller, but a good one) (tie)
6. Seagate (though their enterprise-lite 600 Pro I'd place a notch above... I have one as my main PC's OS SSD and have found it reliable) (tie)
8. Corsair (just a reseller, but a good one... but until recent years they were still on Sandforce-only, and I doubt they do much of anything other than resell; some others at least have their own firmware teams)
----------big dropoff here------------
9. Everyone else
----------wild card-------------------
???. OCZ which is now a Toshiba company, I am not sure where to put this given Toshiba's good rep and OCZ's bad rep; OCZ's firmware and controller designs are still suspect imho so "indilinx" is not a selling point to me, if anything it's the reverse
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox View Post
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
Main: 3570K + R9 290 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS

Last edited by blastingcap; 07-21-2014 at 12:00 PM.
blastingcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 11:25 AM   #12
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,909
Default

those scores are horrible I don't know what you people are happy about.

any Samsung SSD would blow a Sandforce chipst out of the water.

and ATTO Benchmarks mean nothing because they use compressed data and that is where Sandforce excels but in REAL life, most data if not all is NOT compressible so this ATTO benchmark is a useless marketing tool used by Kingston and Sandforce based SSDs to show off their drives which suck so bad.
__________________
Alienware 18 | i7 4810MQ @ 4 GHz | Dual Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | 32 GB Kingston HyperX 1866 MHz RAM
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB SSD + Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD + Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 1TB SSD | Windows 7 Professional
berryracer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 01:08 PM   #13
code65536
Golden Member
 
code65536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berryracer View Post
those scores are horrible I don't know what you people are happy about.

any Samsung SSD would blow a Sandforce chipst out of the water.

and ATTO Benchmarks mean nothing because they use compressed data and that is where Sandforce excels but in REAL life, most data if not all is NOT compressible so this ATTO benchmark is a useless marketing tool used by Kingston and Sandforce based SSDs to show off their drives which suck so bad.
And how much does a Samsung SSD cost per GB vs. the PNY Optima? And without a benchmark program, can you tell the difference in everday usage? It's way more than fast enough to notice the difference when upgrading from HDD. Anything beyond that is just a phallus-size contest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coredump4 View Post
The PNY 5.6.0 download link is dead now. Any alternative download locations?

TIA
http://www28.zippyshare.com/v/77552968/file.html
MD5 hash: afcedb662e063eed9e20b7c20c97f581
__________________
// C64K / A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.
code65536 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 02:07 PM   #14
blastingcap
Diamond Member
 
blastingcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by code65536 View Post
And how much does a Samsung SSD cost per GB vs. the PNY Optima? And without a benchmark program, can you tell the difference in everday usage? It's way more than fast enough to notice the difference when upgrading from HDD. Anything beyond that is just a phallus-size contest.



http://www28.zippyshare.com/v/77552968/file.html
MD5 hash: afcedb662e063eed9e20b7c20c97f581
I don't understand this speed thing. Pretty much any SSD on the market is going to perform well at this point for normal usage scenarios. What really matters to me is reliability. Optimas are too new for me to fully trust that problems have all been ironed out. Samsungs are overpriced unless you really really really value those corner cases where you can feel the speed difference. Other companies have produced reliable SSDs for less.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox View Post
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
Main: 3570K + R9 290 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS
blastingcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 04:06 PM   #15
aviator79
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 26
Default

I don't like PNY any more since I read this:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...r-good-reviews
Advertised speed are only marketing numbers. The do not mean anything at all. IOPS, NAND-Technology, reliable Controllers (Not like the last few SandForce), Warranty, all these things mater as much as the price to me. But this is my personal opinion.
aviator79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 04:11 PM   #16
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by code65536 View Post
And how much does a Samsung SSD cost per GB vs. the PNY Optima? And without a benchmark program, can you tell the difference in everday usage? It's way more than fast enough to notice the difference when upgrading from HDD. Anything beyond that is just a phallus-size contest.



http://www28.zippyshare.com/v/77552968/file.html
MD5 hash: afcedb662e063eed9e20b7c20c97f581
yes in that I agree with you. in day to day life, you wouldn't even know which system had the Samsung SSD and which had the PNY or any other one. It's just the benchmarks.
__________________
Alienware 18 | i7 4810MQ @ 4 GHz | Dual Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | 32 GB Kingston HyperX 1866 MHz RAM
Samsung 850 PRO 256GB SSD + Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD + Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 1TB SSD | Windows 7 Professional
berryracer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 04:22 PM   #17
coredump4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by code65536 View Post
Thank you!
coredump4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 04:38 PM   #18
alan1476
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
Default

Hi code65536, you know Wendy has all this information, they are both about .40 cents a GB, the larger the cheaper. LOL. Long time no see.
alan1476 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2014, 04:38 PM   #19
code65536
Golden Member
 
code65536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aviator79 View Post
I don't like PNY any more since I read this:
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...r-good-reviews
Advertised speed are only marketing numbers. The do not mean anything at all. IOPS, NAND-Technology, reliable Controllers (Not like the last few SandForce), Warranty, all these things mater as much as the price to me. But this is my personal opinion.
LOL, er, yes, that switch is exactly what this thread was originally about: PNY's switch to a different controller. In fact, I was the person who e-mailed the TweakTown reviewer about it, and he wrote the blog post as a result (which was then picked up by places like what you just linked to). (This thread actually pre-dates TT's post by over half a day.)

The TT reviewer was furious, but I was more or less okay with it because the performance was similar. This was, as I said in the first post, nothing like the Kingston switch. That one was unforgiveable. I mean, for a budget SSD with the lowest per-GB price on the market, people who buy it are doing so mostly for the price, and as long as the performance is roughly comparable, I'm willing to forgive some small discrepancy. Now, if this was a higher-end, pricier model where people are paying a premium for specific performance, I'd be less forgiving. But come on, this was something that you could pick up for $0.33 per GB after rebate!

Anyway, there was an outpouring of outrage of reddit that was quickly muted when pcpartpicker posted detailed benchmarks comparing the two variants and confirmed that it was a sidegrade, not a downgrade.


As for the reliability of the Optima, ironically, the Sandforce version should be a bit more reliable, given that the controller has been around for a couple of years and is now a mature, known quantity. Whereas the SMI controller in the original review is the one lacking the market mileage.
__________________
// C64K / A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

Last edited by code65536; 07-21-2014 at 04:43 PM.
code65536 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 12:44 AM   #20
vonWolfhausen
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Default Received the SMI controller by luck

I purchased this drive within a few days of it being posted on newegg, before it was even reviewed on tweaktown. None of the specs indicated what controller or flash was used but I simply gambled on the low price (89 w rebate) cause I figured at that price what the hey. I'm very happy with the drive I received, that said, I would't buy another. Drives have dropped a ton in price over the last few months so I would simply choose a drive who's innards are stated (though SMI is g2g in my book).

i3 sandybridge laptop results:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 507.375 MB/s
Sequential Write : 306.109 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 366.208 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 305.748 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 19.539 MB/s [ 4770.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 57.787 MB/s [ 14108.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 224.775 MB/s [ 54876.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 190.532 MB/s [ 46516.5 IOPS]

Test : 500 MB [C: 70.8% (142.1/200.8 GB)] (x4)
Date : 2014/07/21 21:17:41
vonWolfhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:05 PM   #21
secretsauce
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Default

Is there a way to tell on the outside of the packaging which controller is in the box? I'm guessing no, but thought I'd ask anyway.

With the way prices are dropping, and the fact that newegg offered a prepaid return label, I'm tempted to just return this ssd and wait until the deals in November.
secretsauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:41 PM   #22
code65536
Golden Member
 
code65536's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by secretsauce View Post
Is there a way to tell on the outside of the packaging which controller is in the box? I'm guessing no, but thought I'd ask anyway.

With the way prices are dropping, and the fact that newegg offered a prepaid return label, I'm tempted to just return this ssd and wait until the deals in November.
Um, why does it matter? Unless you have a specific reason to prefer one over the other, the two variants perform similarly, that it doesn't really matter which one you get. (Also, even if the return shipping is free, Newegg still charges a 15% restocking fee.)
__________________
// C64K / A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.
code65536 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:28 PM   #23
secretsauce
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by code65536 View Post
Um, why does it matter? Unless you have a specific reason to prefer one over the other, the two variants perform similarly, that it doesn't really matter which one you get. (Also, even if the return shipping is free, Newegg still charges a 15% restocking fee.)
They waived the restocking fee because the package is still sealed. After I posted my question and while I was making dinner, I think I may have decided to keep it. Did a lot of reading and you are right, its performance isnt bad.
secretsauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2014, 03:43 PM   #24
secretsauce
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3
Default

I decided to keep the Optima and it turned out to have the SMI controller. Test results (SATA III):

Code:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

           Sequential Read :   518.840 MB/s
          Sequential Write :   382.645 MB/s
         Random Read 512KB :   352.828 MB/s
        Random Write 512KB :   372.058 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) :    28.029 MB/s [  6843.1 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) :    94.932 MB/s [ 23176.8 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) :   301.768 MB/s [ 73673.8 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) :   312.643 MB/s [ 76328.8 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [C: 49.0% (109.4/223.5 GB)] (x5)
  Date : 2014/08/06 15:37:59
    OS : Windows 8.1  [6.3 Build 9600] (x64)
secretsauce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.