Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Highly Technical

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2012, 06:16 PM   #1
Biftheunderstudy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default Applications of Bernoulli's principle

I'm giving a short presentation on the Bernoulli principle pretty soon and I'd like to solicit some suggestions from the community.

So far I've determined that I'd like to cover:
Aerofoils, astrophysical jets, and a topic that I recently came across...
That one is a combination of Liouville's theorem and flows in phase space (I can't seem to find much out about this aside from coming across it on a video lecture by Leonard Susskin)

If anyone has any interesting examples that would be great, the crazier the math the better.
Biftheunderstudy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 09:16 PM   #2
Gibsons
Lifer
 
Gibsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,512
Default

The math might not be crazy, but how about the lifting force on a roof from strong (tornado) winds? You could model different roof shapes.
__________________
Tigers are great
They're the toast of town
Life's always better
When a tiger's around!
Gibsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 07:50 AM   #3
CycloWizard
Lifer
 
CycloWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,346
Default

Flushing a toilet.
__________________
"Somewhere, in a parallel universe near you, people read books, scientists are treated like rock stars, and beer is not sold in 30 can value packs." --Sign in a bar in Muncie, Indiana

Anything is possible when you don't know what you're talking about.
CycloWizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 02:12 PM   #4
Paperdoc
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,355
Default

Widely used in measuring systems. Examples:
Pitot tubes for air speed
Differential pressure measurements across a fixed orifice in a pipeline to measure fluid velocity and hence volume flow rate

"Thermocompressors" - special shaped piping devices that allow you to mix two steam sources of different pressures to yield an intermediate-pressure output, but with no moving parts to maintain

Water Eductors - link: http://www.venturipumps.com/eductor.htm

The Dyson "Bladeless Fan" and it claimed "multiplier" effect.
Paperdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2012, 07:53 PM   #5
dkozloski
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,977
Default

The Coanda effect.
__________________
--------------------------------------

Been there, done that; Can't remember.
dkozloski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 02:54 PM   #6
Hacp
Lifer
 
Hacp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,578
Default

Tank Draining.
__________________

Hacp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 03:36 PM   #7
Biftheunderstudy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default

Thanks for the replies everyone.

I really like the dyson air multiplier as an example, I've got lots of images and some vague explanations (enough that I can explain how the Bernoulli effect works in it). Does anyone have some more detailed explanations? A technical document with air speed measurements or specs would be awesome. Really, it would be nice to be able to calculate the air speed and pressure coming out of the aperture on the device.
Biftheunderstudy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 12:05 AM   #8
edcarman
Member
 
edcarman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biftheunderstudy View Post
Thanks for the replies everyone.

I really like the dyson air multiplier as an example, I've got lots of images and some vague explanations (enough that I can explain how the Bernoulli effect works in it). Does anyone have some more detailed explanations? A technical document with air speed measurements or specs would be awesome. Really, it would be nice to be able to calculate the air speed and pressure coming out of the aperture on the device.
Have you seen this?
http://www.ansys.com/staticassets/AN...ss-is-More.pdf

It doesn't have too much detail in the way of calculations, but the velocity contour plot and streamline pictures might be useful.
edcarman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 01:14 AM   #9
eLiu
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,408
Default

I would be *extremely* careful with how you present Bernoulli's principle with respect to airfoils and the generation of lift.

In particular, *in general* saying that the air is moving faster over the top than the bottom increases a net upward pressure force is misleading. For example, with a lifting airfoil, clearly the pressure on the upper surface is less than the pressure on the lower surface. So Bernoulli predicts that the air is moving faster over the top than the bottom. But why is that difference in speed happening? If you say the top surface is longer than the bottom surface, then I offer this: an arbitrarily thin, rigid, flat plate generates lift if it is angled against the incoming flow. The top/bottom surfaces are the same length.

But there is a nice example where that pressure difference/speed difference argument works out nicely. Consider a rotating cylinder in a real (viscous) fluid; say the cylinder rotates clockwise and the flow travels left to right. Due to viscous effects, the cylinder will locally slow down the airflow near it's bottom-most point & locally speed up flow near the top-most point.

In my opinion, the more clear & more obvious description of lift generation is just a simple conservation of momentum. The fluid encounters a solid object and it is deflected (imagine that flat plate again). It took some force to deflect the air which we recognize as lift on the body. It holds together for the cylinder example too; if you look at the flow-field, the deflection caused by the cylinder's rotation is clear.

If the flow you're considering is 1) inviscid, 2) steady, 3) irrotational, and 4) incompressible, then yes Bernoulli's principle can be used to precisely predict lift. Without 4), Bernoulli doesn't exist (Bernoulli is the special case of Euler's Equation [along a streamline] in incompressible flow; [steady] Euler's equation [along a streamline] arises from taking the Navier-Stokes equations and removing viscosity). All real fluids are compressible so 4) is not a realistic assumption, but many real fluids are "imcompresible enough" under the right circumstances for this to be useful. Without 3), Bernoulli is only valid along streamlines. Without 1), Bernoulli isn't valid at all. 2) isn't hard to achieve & in most aerospace applications, 1) implies 3). But removing 1) means you're no longer working in the real world since every real fluid has viscosity.

However in many situations, the effects of viscosity can be localized to a thin "boundary layer" around the body (e.g., airfoil). So consider an "extended" body that includes the original body PLUS all the areas where viscosity is important. Now consider this inviscid, steady, irrotational flow about the new extended body. You can use Bernoulli to estimate the lift generated by this extended body and as long as the extended body is not "too far different" from the original body, the prediction will be usable. Alternatively, as in the rotating cylinder example, Bernoulli can come in handy to motivate why a physical phenomenon occurs (e.g., rotating cylinder generates lift) even if it cannot be used to make precise predictions.

In the aerospace world, pitot-static tubes are a much better application of the value of Bernoulli (here, viscous effects are so minor that they can be neglected). Another classic example is that of the Venturi, a concept used in wind tunnel design.
__________________
Their's not to make reply,<BR>Their's not to reason why,<BR>Their's but to do and die.<BR><BR>My Rigs
eLiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 04:49 AM   #10
Throckmorton
Lifer
 
Throckmorton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,583
Default

Bernoulli's Principle isn't why planes fly. They fly by redirecting airflow downward. That's why pitch is used to adjust the amount of lift the wings produce.The FAA tests ask a pilot how a wing generates lift, and the pilot has to answer "Bernoulli's Principle". Then when he flies the plane, he modulates lift by angling the wings and flaps with no regard for Bernoulli and his principle. Interesting isn't it?


There is one thing I don't understand though. Every explanation says that Bernoulli accounts for a small portion of lift, then they also say that according to the equations it generates the same lift as redirecting airflow. How can both be true? What exactly are the equations based on? Are they set up specially to match observations?

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/bernnew.html

http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/0...irplane-wings/

http://amasci.com/wing/airfoil.html
__________________
K&N air filter = 45x as much dirt in your engine (working link)
http://i52.tinypic.com/50lf0y.gif
"It has already been proven that the concept of a "living wage" is a liberal fantasy." - Patranus

Last edited by Throckmorton; 01-18-2012 at 05:00 AM.
Throckmorton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 05:41 AM   #11
eLiu
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throckmorton View Post
Bernoulli's Principle isn't why planes fly. They fly by redirecting airflow downward. That's why pitch is used to adjust the amount of lift the wings produce.The FAA tests ask a pilot how a wing generates lift, and the pilot has to answer "Bernoulli's Principle". Then when he flies the plane, he modulates lift by angling the wings and flaps with no regard for Bernoulli and his principle. Interesting isn't it?


There is one thing I don't understand though. Every explanation says that Bernoulli accounts for a small portion of lift, then they also say that according to the equations it generates the same lift as redirecting airflow. How can both be true? What exactly are the equations based on? Are they set up specially to match observations?

http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/bernnew.html

http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2009/0...irplane-wings/

http://amasci.com/wing/airfoil.html
You didn't read my post at all did you

Well, that nasa page has the story exactly right. Didn't read the other links. There are "two ways" to explain lift:
1) Newton's 3rd law (as you indicated, the lifting body changes the direction of airflow; it must have exerted a force on the air to do this)
2) Pressure on the upper wing suface is lower than presure on the lower wing surface. Net upward pressure = lift
In reality these things are one and the same. Let me explain in more detail...

The Navier-Stokes Equations are an excellent model for fluid flow on a very large scale. Any fluid is made up of a huge number of molecules. Tracking the behavior of every molecule individually is unbelievably expensive if we're talking about a region of space that's more than a few microns on each side. But if we're looking at an amount of fluid in say the earth's atmosphere, then it turns out that the microscopic behavior of every molecule doesn't really matter. So we can assume that the fluid is a continuum--instead of being made of a whole bunch of tiny particles, it's one continous blob.

Using that assumption, Newton's laws, and some calculus (well, maybe a lot of calculus), you can derive the Navier-Stokes Equations. In 3D, they are a set of coupled partial differential equations describing the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy. These do a great job describing fluid flow; so much so that the enginerring and scientific community accept them basically as law in the macroscopic setting. Unfortunately, solving the Navier-Stokes equations exactly is an unsolved problem except in some very, very special cases. But we can approximate them reasonably well using (big) computers.

The Euler Equations arise from setting viscosity = 0 in the Navier-Stokes Equations. It's a HUGE simplification but Euler Eqns are still very hard to solve. They govern inviscid flow at the most general level. As I mention in my previous post, the Bernoulli equation is a special case of the euler equations. Bernoulli results from considering the euler equations along a single streamline in incompressible (density=constant; reasonable for most liquids and gasses moving at low speed), steady (not time varying) flow. You can only make comparisons across multiple streamlines if the flow is also irrotational (i'm not going to explain this one but suffice it to say, most aerodynamic flows are). When you have all of these conditions, the flow is called "potential" (same thing mathematically as electric potential fields if you're familiar with that). So that should answer your question about where Bernoulli comes from.

At its core, Bernoulli describes how changes in fluid velocity affect changes in fluid pressure.

Anyway, even without big computers, I can apply the Navier Stokes or Euler equations to make interesting qualitative statements about fluid mechanics. For example, imagine an isolated airfoil in "flight". For simplicity, the fluid is inviscid so drag=0. You observed that it feels a lifting force b/c it deflects the air downard. Ok. Now imagine drawing a box surrounding the airfoil*. Say I measure the momentum of the air crossing each face of my box. If I add up (read: integrate) all the momenta, I'll notice that the momentum changed! Why? B/c the airfoil exerted a force on the air. So this change in momentum will be precisely the lift. That was very qualitative. I can make it a little more quantitative by attempting to evaluate all the terms of the Euler Equations. What I will find is that depending on how I draw the box, I could find that:
Lift1 = change in momentum of air; 1) from above
Lift2 = pressure difference of the top/bottom surface of my airfoil; 2) from above
Lift3 = the average of the above two quantities
Note that the value of Lift is fixed, so 1) and 2) produce the same results, Lift1=Lift2. So Lift3=(Lift1+Lift2)/2 is the same thing too. So momentum or pressure, or both are valid ways of explaining lift. It all depends on your frame of reference.

*Ok I'm cutting corners here. Technically the box cannot contain the airfoil. Mathematically you can get around this issue easily but it's hard to explain without a diagram & hard to explain if you aren't familiar with path integrals. So I'll skip it for now...


SO it's not really that Bernoulli accounts for lift. If I knew the exact velocity distribution around an aircraft in *inviscid* *incompressible* *steady* *irrotational* flow, then I could use Bernoulli (which relates velocity to pressure) to compute what the pressure distribution is. From that, I could compute the lift.

In a viscous flow, if I knew the exact velocity distribution around the "extended body" (described in my previous post), I could use Bernoulli to *approximate* the lift. (This turns out to be a good approximation).

However, in both cases, knowing the exact velocity distribution is really hard. So hard that nobody attempts to compute lift by measuring those things physically. But it often is a reasonable way to compute lift on the computer, where you have solved the euler equations (approximately) and have access to the approximate velocity values at any location.

The issue is that people twist Bernoulli. They say silly things like air travels farther over the top of the airfoil than the bottom, so it has to move faster over the top (patently false reasoning for a true statement). Since it's moving faster, the pressure is lower ("true" by Bernoulli). Hence lift is generated. ("True" in quotes b/c you have to be careful where/how you apply Bernoulli in real physical flows, since they aren't incompressible, steady, invscid, and irrotational. With the right assumptions you can get a reasonable approximation.)

The right reasoning is: we observe that lift is generated; one valid explanation is pressure difference. Bernoulli then tells us that hte air is moving faster on the side with lower pressure than the side with higher pressure. If you knew the pressure at every point, you could use Bernoulli to recover the velocity values. But this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the top surface being "longer" or any crazy crap like that.
__________________
Their's not to make reply,<BR>Their's not to reason why,<BR>Their's but to do and die.<BR><BR>My Rigs
eLiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 09:51 AM   #12
Biftheunderstudy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 354
Default

This discussion of lift from aerofoils is exactly why I wanted to talk about them during the presentation, so many people get it wrong, I wanted to do it right. (Given that the talk is finished and I didn't get yelled at, I think I managed in this regard)

There are a lot of interesting facets to Bernoulli's equation, especially when you consider relaxing some of the assumptions and extending it into regimes where it normally doesn't belong...its remarkably good at it, though maybe its incorrect to call it a Bernoulli equation at that point, its clear its analogous though.
Biftheunderstudy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 12:50 PM   #13
alkemyst
No Lifer
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Corner of EPIC and ┼WESOME ST.
Posts: 76,743
Default

rear diffusers in automobiles.
__________________
Trying to save the world one day at a time.

You can't help those that don't want to be saved.
alkemyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 12:03 PM   #14
LiuKangBakinPie
Diamond Member
 
LiuKangBakinPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Right Behind you
Posts: 3,912
Default

__________________
MMORPG players are freaks. If I ever catch my kids doing anything with a computer except for normal stuff like porn and hacking into school to change their grades, I will beat their asses like a red headed step child.
3DMark11
LiuKangBakinPie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:56 PM   #15
gbeirn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 302
Default

How about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iomega_Bernoulli_Box

Not sure if that applies to what you are doing.
gbeirn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:09 PM   #16
eLiu
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeirn View Post
How about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iomega_Bernoulli_Box

Not sure if that applies to what you are doing.
Oh wow, I had never heard of that product before. That is awesome.
__________________
Their's not to make reply,<BR>Their's not to reason why,<BR>Their's but to do and die.<BR><BR>My Rigs
eLiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 10:27 PM   #17
Anteaus
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,747
Default

If your looking for an everyday application, look at the multi-stage air compressors.
Anteaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:33 PM   #18
capeconsultant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 454
Default

Isn't the Bernoulli Principle why the head "floats" above a spinning hard drive? They say this is the equivalent of a Jumbo Jet flying 1 foot above the ground. Or something like that
__________________
Mac mini - 2.3ghz - core i7-16GB Ram | 24 inch Dell IPS monitor | OCZ Vector 512GB SSD | 2TB WD External | CapeWP.com
capeconsultant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2012, 04:18 AM   #19
The Boston Dangler
Lifer
 
The Boston Dangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Democratic People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 13,276
Default

i disagree with bernoulli not causing lift, and cite my favorite example - racecar underbodies producing massive downforce. with a largely flat and sealed mandated plane, every effort is made to accelerate airflow under the car to reduce pressure. the accelerated flow is then focused out the back to reduce drag, the 2 effects compounding each other.

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/t...-aerodynamics/
__________________
If God had meant for us to walk, why did he give us feet that fit car pedals?

-Sir Stirling Moss
The Boston Dangler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.