Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Consumer Electronics > Mobile Devices & Gadgets

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2011, 03:51 PM   #1
s44
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,566
Default iPhone 5 looks like...?

this?

Lawsuits incoming from Samsung, HTC, Motorola in 3, 2, 1...
s44 is online now  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:54 PM   #2
JS80
Lifer
 
JS80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,285
Default

Hah! They copied the Samsung GS2!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoberFett View Post
95% of what Craig says is stupid. The other 5% is REALLY stupid.
JS80 is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 03:55 PM   #3
Oyeve
Lifer
 
Oyeve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,672
Default

Probably true. I cant see any other type of design for the ip5 if it goes larger screeen.
__________________
My Heat
Oyeve is online now  
Old 08-31-2011, 04:33 PM   #4
cheezy321
Diamond Member
 
cheezy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arcadia, AZ
Posts: 6,204
Default

So the iPhone 5 copied the Samsung SGS2 which copied the iPhone 4?

/head asplodes
__________________
Free *Snorgles*! PM for details.

The biggest problem with America is not faceless corporate forces; the biggest problem with America is people who blame faceless corporate forces instead of accepting accountability for their own lives. - Chuck Klosterman
cheezy321 is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 04:37 PM   #5
zsdersw
Lifer
 
zsdersw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location
Posts: 10,560
Default

Slow news day, I suspect.
__________________
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -Mark Twain

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand -Milton Friedman

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon
zsdersw is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 04:54 PM   #6
QuantumPion
Diamond Member
 
QuantumPion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,509
Default

zoom and enhance!
QuantumPion is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 05:23 PM   #7
boomhower
Diamond Member
 
boomhower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,537
Default

I don't get it. Of course they are going to look similar. They a large rectangles covered mostly with a screen a few buttons on the bottom.
__________________
heat
boomhower is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 05:29 PM   #8
NoStateofMind
Diamond Member
 
NoStateofMind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boomhower View Post
I don't get it. Of course they are going to look similar. They a large rectangles covered mostly with a screen a few buttons on the bottom.


You just stole my idea for a new phone! I'll sue!
__________________
JOSIE the OUTLAW

"For this reason was the Son of God manifest, that God may be Glorified IN Him"...words from a dream
NoStateofMind is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 06:35 PM   #9
Bateluer
Lifer
 
Bateluer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 26,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezy321 View Post
So the iPhone 5 copied the Samsung SGS2 which copied the iPhone 4 which copied the Samsung F700

/head asplodes
Fixed it.
Bateluer is offline  
Old 09-01-2011, 02:38 AM   #10
Envian
Member
 
Envian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Planet Android
Posts: 42
Default

Something interesting about iPhone... remember this is a concept...

iPhone 5 concept video
Envian is offline  
Old 09-01-2011, 09:16 AM   #11
cheezy321
Diamond Member
 
cheezy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arcadia, AZ
Posts: 6,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bateluer View Post
Fixed it.
Lol, silly fanboi. The samsung F700 was announced after the original iphone was announced. Feb 2007 to be exact, iPhone was announced Jan 2007. Basically these two phones were being developed at the same time. What happened after the iPhone came out? Here comes the damning evidence....


Wanna read more? Link: http://thisismynext.com/2011/04/20/t...-samsung-f700/


Get your facts straight.
__________________
Free *Snorgles*! PM for details.

The biggest problem with America is not faceless corporate forces; the biggest problem with America is people who blame faceless corporate forces instead of accepting accountability for their own lives. - Chuck Klosterman
cheezy321 is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 08:45 AM   #12
Doboji
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,913
Default

Have you actually seen a SGSII? doesnt look anything even remotely like the iPhone 4.... Its not even close.
__________________
The Family

Current Toys: Samsung Galaxy SIII, iPad 3 32GB WIFI, lots of mechanical watches!

Last edited by Doboji; 09-05-2011 at 08:51 AM.
Doboji is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 09:07 AM   #13
zsdersw
Lifer
 
zsdersw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location
Posts: 10,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doboji View Post
Have you actually seen a SGSII? doesnt look anything even remotely like the iPhone 4.... Its not even close.
Apparently the fact that the SGSII is bigger, has a bigger screen, and has two capacitive buttons on either side of the physical button doesn't matter if you're an Apple fanatic.
__________________
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -Mark Twain

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand -Milton Friedman

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon
zsdersw is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 01:41 PM   #14
Bateluer
Lifer
 
Bateluer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 26,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezy321 View Post
Lol, silly fanboi. The samsung F700 was announced after the original iphone was announced. Feb 2007 to be exact, iPhone was announced Jan 2007.

Get your facts straight.
F700 was announced at Cebit 2006, but didn't have any hardware to show. Remove the iPhone picture from your shot, observing only the F700 and SGS2. Still with me? Ok, observer how Samsung has added the standard Android buttons of Menu and Back next to their large center button, common on both the F700 and SGS2. One would expect the visuals to improve between the 2006 F700 and the 2011 SGS2, hardly noteworthy. TW may look very iPhone-like, but its a lot like saying Gnome looks like Windows.


Quote:
Originally Posted by zsdersw View Post
Apparently the fact that the SGSII is bigger, has a bigger screen, and has two capacitive buttons on either side of the physical button doesn't matter if you're an Apple fanatic.
Course not. TW is very iPhone-like though, one of the big reasons people hate it. But its basically squarish pictures aligned on a grid. Like pretty much every other GUI every made by anyone ever.
Bateluer is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 02:53 PM   #15
Doboji
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezy321 View Post
Lol, silly fanboi. The samsung F700 was announced after the original iphone was announced. Feb 2007 to be exact, iPhone was announced Jan 2007. Basically these two phones were being developed at the same time. What happened after the iPhone came out? Here comes the damning evidence....


Wanna read more? Link: http://thisismynext.com/2011/04/20/t...-samsung-f700/


Get your facts straight.
Is it because they added color to the icons? Is that an Apple "thing". Apple owns the patent or trademark for brightly colored squareish icons? Help me out here... because I fail to see how the Galaxy S more closely resembles the iPhone than it does any other touchscreen smartphone on the market.

Compare the Galaxy S, iPhone 3, iPhone 4, Blackberry Storm, Nexus One, Nokia 5800, Palm Pre...

They all have similar characteristics. I fail completely to see how the Galaxy S compares closer to the iPhone 3 than it does many of the others...

The only thing questionable is the way the Touchwiz Appdrawer looks in comparison to the iPhone home screens. Would the lawsuits end if Touchwiz adopted a vertically scrolling app drawer like the standard Android? Beyond that I fail utterly to see the problem here.

Apple is clearly engaging in anti-competitive behavior with these injunctions and lawsuits. I don't know if they'll ever pay for it... or get stopped in anyway. But it's pretty awful from my perspective.
__________________
The Family

Current Toys: Samsung Galaxy SIII, iPad 3 32GB WIFI, lots of mechanical watches!
Doboji is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 04:04 PM   #16
akugami
Diamond Member
 
akugami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 費城, 賓夕法尼亞州
Posts: 4,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zsdersw View Post
Apparently the fact that the SGSII is bigger, has a bigger screen, and has two capacitive buttons on either side of the physical button doesn't matter if you're an Apple fanatic.
The fact that Android was largely influenced (copied) by iOS doesn't seem to matter if you're an Android fanatic either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doboji View Post
Is it because they added color to the icons? Is that an Apple "thing". Apple owns the patent or trademark for brightly colored squareish icons? Help me out here... because I fail to see how the Galaxy S more closely resembles the iPhone than it does any other touchscreen smartphone on the market.
Many will say that the iPhone copied the Samsung F700. Ergonomically, if you compare the whole device, they are completely different. It is only when viewing just the front face is it similar. The much thicker body of the F700 as well as the slide out keyboard for instance. But if you wanna argue UI, the F700 is largely navigated by "scrolling" through icons. You can grab a copy of the user manual if you wanna see how it controls. Anyone can see that the UI is navigated completely different from the iPhone.

Quote:
The only thing questionable is the way the Touchwiz Appdrawer looks in comparison to the iPhone home screens. Would the lawsuits end if Touchwiz adopted a vertically scrolling app drawer like the standard Android? Beyond that I fail utterly to see the problem here.
Likely. Keep in mind that Apple's argument vs Samsung is for Trade Dress and not any single element. As has been stated many times in these forums, multiple common elements may be combined to form a unique design. Something many people will keep ignoring. Apple's argument on some of the newer Samsung devices aren't that many, or all, of the elements are unique and original to Apple devices.

Apple's opinion is that taken as a whole, Samsung has copied the iPhone from the physical aspects of the device down to the feel of the OS. And considering how many reviewers stated how Samsung's Touchwhiz interface feels like iOS and the fact that Samsung has been previously sued by the likes of RIM for copying cell phone designs, it's hard to argue in favor of Samsung if one was to be completely unbiased.

Quote:
Apple is clearly engaging in anti-competitive behavior with these injunctions and lawsuits. I don't know if they'll ever pay for it... or get stopped in anyway. But it's pretty awful from my perspective.
To a degree I agree with you. However, think on this, if you owned Apple completely and you felt your competitors were copying your design, would you sue them? It all comes down to whether one feels Apple's patents and Trade Dress arguments are valid or not. Apple clearly feels that way so they are doing something about it.

If Apple's management feels their patents or designs are being infringed upon, they are legally obligated to do something about it. ...the directors and officers of a corporation shall exercise their powers and discharge their duties with a view to the interests of the corporation and of the shareholders.... The bolded section is taken from Section 716 of Main's Business Corporation Act but every state will have some similar statue. The wording may differ but in essence, the management of every company is legally obligated to do everything in management's power to look out for the interest of its shareholders. There is nothing stated about the public's best interest. So if Apple's management feels their IP and Trademarks are being infringed upon, they have a legal obligation to do something about it.

Keep in mind I am not arguing that Apple's IP and Trademarks are being infringed upon is correct. I am merely stating why Apple may be legally obligated to take legal action against Samsung, HTC, and anyone else if they feel their Trademarks and IP are being infringed.
__________________
Canon 50D
Canon 16-35mm L MK1
_______________________
That was insensitive of me. I asked you to stop being stupid without considering how extremely difficult that must be for you.
akugami is offline  
Old 09-05-2011, 10:50 PM   #17
Doboji
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akugami View Post
The fact that Android was largely influenced (copied) by iOS doesn't seem to matter if you're an Android fanatic either.



Many will say that the iPhone copied the Samsung F700. Ergonomically, if you compare the whole device, they are completely different. It is only when viewing just the front face is it similar. The much thicker body of the F700 as well as the slide out keyboard for instance. But if you wanna argue UI, the F700 is largely navigated by "scrolling" through icons. You can grab a copy of the user manual if you wanna see how it controls. Anyone can see that the UI is navigated completely different from the iPhone.

Likely. Keep in mind that Apple's argument vs Samsung is for Trade Dress and not any single element. As has been stated many times in these forums, multiple common elements may be combined to form a unique design. Something many people will keep ignoring. Apple's argument on some of the newer Samsung devices aren't that many, or all, of the elements are unique and original to Apple devices.

Apple's opinion is that taken as a whole, Samsung has copied the iPhone from the physical aspects of the device down to the feel of the OS. And considering how many reviewers stated how Samsung's Touchwhiz interface feels like iOS and the fact that Samsung has been previously sued by the likes of RIM for copying cell phone designs, it's hard to argue in favor of Samsung if one was to be completely unbiased.

To a degree I agree with you. However, think on this, if you owned Apple completely and you felt your competitors were copying your design, would you sue them? It all comes down to whether one feels Apple's patents and Trade Dress arguments are valid or not. Apple clearly feels that way so they are doing something about it.

If Apple's management feels their patents or designs are being infringed upon, they are legally obligated to do something about it. ...the directors and officers of a corporation shall exercise their powers and discharge their duties with a view to the interests of the corporation and of the shareholders.... The bolded section is taken from Section 716 of Main's Business Corporation Act but every state will have some similar statue. The wording may differ but in essence, the management of every company is legally obligated to do everything in management's power to look out for the interest of its shareholders. There is nothing stated about the public's best interest. So if Apple's management feels their IP and Trademarks are being infringed upon, they have a legal obligation to do something about it.

Keep in mind I am not arguing that Apple's IP and Trademarks are being infringed upon is correct. I am merely stating why Apple may be legally obligated to take legal action against Samsung, HTC, and anyone else if they feel their Trademarks and IP are being infringed.
I absolutely understand Apples perspective, if you have the cash, and the legal system allows for you to litigate continuously against your competitors with things like this "trade dress". I am simply dismayed and angered that this is allowed to continue as it is.

Trade dress as you describe it is completely subjective on every level... It is beyond me to understand why our legal system allows for it.

For example why aren't there lawsuits all the time in the auto industry? The same sort of thing happens all the time... Doesn't the Ford Fusion copy the trade dress of the Camry and Accord? What about the F150 and it's competitors?

And sorry even though I understand Apple from a corporate perspective... I will forever hate them for taking advantage of the system. I think Apple arrogance has them believing they own the "trade dress" for the touchscreen smartphone as it exists today period.
__________________
The Family

Current Toys: Samsung Galaxy SIII, iPad 3 32GB WIFI, lots of mechanical watches!
Doboji is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 01:01 AM   #18
senseamp
Lifer
 
senseamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,582
Default


2006

2009
And Apple is calling Samsung the "copyist" I guess they are living up to Steve Jobs' "ethics" of stealing instead of copying.
__________________
*Not speaking on behalf of any company*

Last edited by senseamp; 09-06-2011 at 01:06 AM.
senseamp is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 02:23 AM   #19
runawayprisoner
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,496
Default

I am not sure if it's just me, but doesn't "steal" essentially means stripping one of his own possession without his consent?

In that regard, Apple has only managed to "copy", not steal.
__________________
Poking through JPSX...
runawayprisoner is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 02:43 AM   #20
senseamp
Lifer
 
senseamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by runawayprisoner View Post
I am not sure if it's just me, but doesn't "steal" essentially means stripping one of his own possession without his consent?

In that regard, Apple has only managed to "copy", not steal.
No, it managed to steal. Meaning not only did it make a copy of Samsung's design, but it wants to strip Samsung of the ability to use it and claim it as solely Apple's. That's what Jobs meant by good artists copy, great artist steal. Great artists, as he sees himself, get away with not just copying a design, but stealing credit for it and claiming it as their own.
__________________
*Not speaking on behalf of any company*
senseamp is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 03:19 AM   #21
Rick James Astley
Golden Member
 
Rick James Astley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,387
Default

The iphone precedes the F700, one of the sites had an actual hands on impression article but Samsung asked them to take it down because the prototype of the F700 (which according to Samsung was in development since April 06) performed poorly. The actual hands on article (think there was a video too) was post iphone release.

Apple pushed this patent litigation business too far, arguments about protecting IP are BS, the lawsuits are a poor attempt to fight off competition.

What if one of the early PDA OEM's had patented the accelerometer function of switching landscape/portrait modes or other functions? All OEM's, including Apple and of course us consumers would have suffered.

Apple cherry picked features of various PDA's and once tech innovations and material pricing made it viable to produce a phone with high profit margins, they launched the iphone and then turned around and tried to restrict others from using features they stole to begin with.

Kick the competition out under the disguise of trade dress protection...
Rick James Astley is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 04:45 AM   #22
zsdersw
Lifer
 
zsdersw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location
Posts: 10,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akugami View Post
The fact that Android was largely influenced (copied) by iOS doesn't seem to matter if you're an Android fanatic either.
The fact that all these lawsuits and injunctions are recent, rather than when Android first came out, makes your statement irrelevant to this discussion.
__________________
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -Mark Twain

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand -Milton Friedman

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon
zsdersw is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 10:33 AM   #23
Doboji
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,913
Default

In any case... Apples shenanigans is very much like all the crazy lawsuits about spilled coffee and burglars falling through sky lights. Legally they can do it, financially the stand to gain from it... But it makes them total deadbeat douche bags.
__________________
The Family

Current Toys: Samsung Galaxy SIII, iPad 3 32GB WIFI, lots of mechanical watches!
Doboji is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 08:25 PM   #24
akugami
Diamond Member
 
akugami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 費城, 賓夕法尼亞州
Posts: 4,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zsdersw View Post
The fact that all these lawsuits and injunctions are recent, rather than when Android first came out, makes your statement irrelevant to this discussion.
So my statement is irrelevant because you decide it was? It's ok for you to constantly shit on Apple and Apple users in every thread for certain behavior but when similar behavior is pointed out and attributed to Android, it's OEM's, and it's fanboys suddenly it's irrelevant?
__________________
Canon 50D
Canon 16-35mm L MK1
_______________________
That was insensitive of me. I asked you to stop being stupid without considering how extremely difficult that must be for you.
akugami is offline  
Old 09-08-2011, 04:56 AM   #25
zsdersw
Lifer
 
zsdersw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location
Posts: 10,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akugami View Post
So my statement is irrelevant because you decide it was? It's ok for you to constantly shit on Apple and Apple users in every thread for certain behavior but when similar behavior is pointed out and attributed to Android, it's OEM's, and it's fanboys suddenly it's irrelevant?
Not because I said so.. because of common sense. Assuming you're correct about Android being built on ideas put forth by iOS, essentially copying iOS, that would only be relevant to this discussion about another of Apple's current legal escapades if it was 2008 (when Android was first released)... not 2011.

Android has been around, in all of its iOS-copying (according to you) glory, for a few years without all of these lawsuits. To bring up that purported copying now, in a discussion about Apple's present legal efforts to kill Android is outdated.
__________________
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -Mark Twain

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand -Milton Friedman

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon

Last edited by zsdersw; 09-08-2011 at 05:01 AM.
zsdersw is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.