|
|
 |
12-04-2010, 08:31 AM
|
#1
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,514
|
Do not install KB982670 if you run windows xp
it kills your boot time by over 2-3 minutes. before you can get network access
it is framework 4 for .net
|
|
|
12-04-2010, 08:34 AM
|
#2
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: London, Ontario Canada
Posts: 19,435
|
wrong forum
__________________
My Rigs
When I was four I gave myself a needle and the whole hospital said I got shot when I was 22 and asian. I drove a black honda. - catchphrase
Compare your lives to mine and then kill yourselves
|
|
|
12-04-2010, 08:41 AM
|
#3
|
|
No Lifer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: ::1
Posts: 55,131
|
So what you're saying is don't do a Boo Boo?
__________________
Stop pleasing others and start pleasing yourself.
|
|
|
12-04-2010, 03:36 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator Peripherals
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 22,462
|
Actually, it is the right forum - an OS update. KB982670 is not an auto update for XP. It is an optional one that is not needed.
"Specifically, the .NET Framework 4 Client Profile is released as a recommended update that may be installed automatically on Windows Vista and Windows 7. The Client Profile is released as an optional update for Windows XP. In Windows XP, you must manually run WU and select the .NET Framework 4 Client Profile."
__________________
Corky-G - Tucson, AZ
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress." John Adams
|
|
|
12-05-2010, 12:48 PM
|
#5
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Chicagoland, IL USA
Posts: 6,549
|
I just ran this last night on a fresh XP Home w/ SP3 slipstreamed refresh I'm doing for my friends mom.
Boot times remained the same as far as I can tell.
Chuck
|
|
|
12-05-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 8,830
|
I've ordered that it be installed on numerous PCs, and I haven't had anyone complain of significantly lengthened boot times yet.
__________________
signature file missing.
|
|
|
12-06-2010, 12:57 PM
|
#7
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 1,906
|
I've installed that update on a number of machines(15+) without any issues
There is one optional update that for some reason breaks the network stack on the machines that I've installed it on, which is the Windows PowerShell 2.0 and WinRM 2.0 can't remember what the kb number is at the moment
__________________
Why does the Universe go to all the bother of existing? - Stephen Hawking
Procrastination is the art of keeping up with last week.
|
|
|
12-07-2010, 12:28 PM
|
#8
|
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,966
|
I've installed it on many machines so far and haven't really noticed any issues...
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 02:10 AM
|
#9
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NW Alabama
Posts: 23,741
|
I've put it on a couple of xp computers and while the boot time was not affected, it did slow the starting up of windows firewall long enough to show the "no firewall" notification for a few minutes.
|
|
|
12-14-2010, 10:39 PM
|
#10
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,695
|
Do you have a link to back this up or is this your experience?
I always debate whether to install the optional .NET versions on a system when I am loading XP.
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 10:28 AM
|
#11
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 14,569
|
I just installed that patch on a dozen XP systems, and had no problems with extended boot times.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.
|