Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Off Topic

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2010, 08:41 PM   #1
aphex
Moderator
All Things Apple
 
aphex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 38,546
Default Are all Polo shirts created equal? (Difference between Ralph Lauren, Lacoste, etc...)

So i came across some Lacoste Polo's for $45 locally (regularly $75) and it got me thinking, is there really a big difference between the big well known brands such as Ralph Lauren ($70) & Lacoste ($75) vs. lesser known Polo's from Banana Republic ($30) and J Crew ($33) and others?

I mean they are all 100% cotton, so are the difference that great? Do some shrink less / fade less than others?

Just curious as I need to buy some new Polos for work and am debating spending less and getting a few more.
__________________
Heatware (149-0-0) | eBay (363-0-0)
aphex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:42 PM   #2
Crono
Lifer
 
Crono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 18,893
Default

Not much. I would go for whatever is cheapest. Most of them are just made in Ceylon (Sri Lanka) or India at equally good factories.
__________________
"The study of history is the best medicine for a sick mind; for in history you have a record of the infinite variety of human experience plainly set out for all to see: and in that record you can find for yourself and your country both examples and warnings: fine things to take as models, base things, rotten through and through, to avoid." - Livy
Crono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:44 PM   #3
amdhunter
Lifer
 
amdhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 22,068
Default

I like the way the Lacoste and Ralph Laurens fit me, but damn, they get beat up nasty after just a few washes.

I've been sticking to the cheap Foot Locker ones (3 for $20) for daily use.
amdhunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:45 PM   #4
zerocool84
Lifer
 
zerocool84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 32,405
Default

WTF?!? Why would you pay $75 let alone $45 or $30 for a Polo shirt? Casiotech???
zerocool84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:45 PM   #5
IndyColtsFan
Lifer
 
IndyColtsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 28,851
Default

I get many of my polo shirts free from work. For those I buy, I try to get the ones made from the moisture-wicking fabric. They aren't terribly expensive at Kohl's and hold up very well. I think most of them are under $20. I would never pay more than $25 or $30 for a polo.
__________________
MAIN: i7-2600K @ 4.5 Ghz | Asus P8Z68-V Pro | G.Skill 16 GB DDR3-1600 | Seagate 600 series 240 GB SSD (boot) | Samsung Evo 500 GB | 2 TB (data) | MSI Lightning GTX780 | Cosmos S | Dell U2410 and 2001fp | Seasonic Platinum 760 | Windows 8.1 x64 Enterprise
IndyColtsFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:46 PM   #6
cheezy321
Diamond Member
 
cheezy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Arcadia, AZ
Posts: 6,204
Default

Lacoste polos fit me perfectly. Ralph Lauren seem to be too small or too big.

My lacoste polos have lasted me a long long time. They have been pretty durable, IMO
__________________
Free *Snorgles*! PM for details.

The biggest problem with America is not faceless corporate forces; the biggest problem with America is people who blame faceless corporate forces instead of accepting accountability for their own lives. - Chuck Klosterman
cheezy321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:46 PM   #7
GodlessAstronomer
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 17,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerocool84 View Post
WTF?!? Why would you pay $75 let alone $45 or $30 for a Polo shirt? Casiotech???
This is what I wonder whenever I see them in stores. Except around here Lacoste is more like NZD$200 (~$140 USD). Yikes.
GodlessAstronomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:48 PM   #8
JS80
Lifer
 
JS80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,285
Default

Lacoste shirts used to be made by Izod, and Izod shirts used to sell the same shirts without the croc logo. But $75 for a lacoste shirt is absurd. Will never do. If you give a shit about that kind of stuff go get knockoffs from eBay.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoberFett View Post
95% of what Craig says is stupid. The other 5% is REALLY stupid.
JS80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:48 PM   #9
Tiamat
Lifer
 
Tiamat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 14,041
Default

Some use better grades of cotton (Pima). Also, they are all cut differently. You have to go and check them all out, they are very far from being the same. That isn't to say that spending more gets you a better quality polo. I personally do not like Lacoste and half of the Ralph Lauren polos. I tend to prefer Banana Republic due to fit and material (softness).
Tiamat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:49 PM   #10
IndyColtsFan
Lifer
 
IndyColtsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 28,851
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amdhunter View Post
I like the way the Lacoste and Ralph Laurens fit me, but damn, they get beat up nasty after just a few washes.

I've been sticking to the cheap Foot Locker ones (3 for $20) for daily use.
The pure cotton (I guess that's the fabric used in most) polo shirts tend to fade and get really beat up after many wash cycles. That is another advantage of getting the polo shirts made from the moisture-wicking stuff -- you can wash them dozens of times and they look as good as when you bought them.

Here are the ones I'm talking about:

http://www.kohls.com/kohlsStore/mens...mance+Polo.jsp

You can get them in plain colors too without the stripes.
__________________
MAIN: i7-2600K @ 4.5 Ghz | Asus P8Z68-V Pro | G.Skill 16 GB DDR3-1600 | Seagate 600 series 240 GB SSD (boot) | Samsung Evo 500 GB | 2 TB (data) | MSI Lightning GTX780 | Cosmos S | Dell U2410 and 2001fp | Seasonic Platinum 760 | Windows 8.1 x64 Enterprise
IndyColtsFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:50 PM   #11
amdhunter
Lifer
 
amdhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 22,068
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezy321 View Post
Lacoste polos fit me perfectly. Ralph Lauren seem to be too small or too big.

My lacoste polos have lasted me a long long time. They have been pretty durable, IMO
The Ralph Lauren ones make me look thinner than I really am somehow. That's why I like them. Dark RL's FTW.
amdhunter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:50 PM   #12
TheVrolok
Lifer
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,478
Default

J Crew is lesser known? I buy most of my Polo's on sale from J Crew/Banana Republic for like 15 bucks, quality is just fine.
__________________
[3570k @ 4.0] [MSI Z77A-GD55] [16GB RAM] [EVGA GTX 670 FTW]
TheVrolok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:51 PM   #13
coldmeat
Diamond Member
 
coldmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ON, CA
Posts: 9,178
Default

I find a lot of cheaper ones have shitty collars. The quality polos that I've had had thicker collars which helps them keep shape better.
__________________

coldmeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:51 PM   #14
spidey07
No Lifer
 
spidey07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 65,434
Default

Quality is MUCH better. Color holds better, better weave, better thread, etc. It will still look mostly new after years of wear.
__________________
___
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
spidey07 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 08:54 PM   #15
shortylickens
No Lifer
 
shortylickens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 54,182
Default

I had to go to something important once while I was home on leave. My mother insisted I buy an $80 Ralph Lauren. It is by far the ugliest and least comfortable shirt I own.

When I was bored one day I stopped by a Marshalls and picked up three soft, 4 dollar polyester shirts that still look brand new after several years of washing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lean L View Post
I'm getting sick of navigating this tech forum. Since when do nerds speak in parables and passive aggressive tones?

Say what your observation is or move on... I keep saying it and I'll say it again. These posts add absolutely no value besides a +1 to your post count.
shortylickens is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:57 PM   #16
Patranus
Diamond Member
 
Patranus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,240
Default

The material used by RL is significantly higher quality compared to those off the shelf ones.

You can pick up some good end of season RL at Marshalls.
Patranus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:58 PM   #17
M0oG0oGaiPan
Diamond Member
 
M0oG0oGaiPan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: dust2
Posts: 7,061
Default

They have some pretty good cheap polo's at target:
http://dappered.com/2010/06/target-m...fit-polo-sale/ (not my site)
$8 a piece at full price.

I like the signature polos at express also. I would never pay more than $14 for one. So wait for a coupon. Their pique polos are horrible and the collar is horrible. Avoid those. H&M makes one called the "cotton stretch fit polo" that's cheap as hell and is pretty decent. I think those are ~$13 otd. A little thin with an OK collar. You can get those for ~$11 when they have their 20% coupon.

These polos are a little fitted so they look better imho. Just wash in cold water inside out and hang dry to make them last longer.
__________________
Digital Game Deals | Magicka Tips | BF3 Name = w00py69
M0oG0oGaiPan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:03 PM   #18
DaveSimmons
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 37,123
Default

Land's End polos have a 3-button placket which I prefer over the 2-button. They also hold up well.

(The pima / interlochen polos, not the mesh. The mesh ones are cheaper but lower quality.)
DaveSimmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:07 PM   #19
ScottSwing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Are all Polo shirts created equal?
They all make you equally a douche.
ScottSwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:09 PM   #20
ScottSwing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aphex View Post
So i came across some Lacoste Polo's for $45 locally (regularly $75) and it got me thinking, is there really a big difference between the big well known brands such as Ralph Lauren ($70) & Lacoste ($75) vs. lesser known Polo's from Banana Republic ($30) and J Crew ($33) and others?

I mean they are all 100% cotton, so are the difference that great? Do some shrink less / fade less than others?

Just curious as I need to buy some new Polos for work and am debating spending less and getting a few more.
If you're going for functionality, just go with a well-known cheap brand.
ScottSwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:16 PM   #21
darkxshade
Lifer
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Podunk
Posts: 13,729
Default

I like the slim fit Brooks Brothers golden fleece polos. I bought 3 back in 2006 that I still wear today.
__________________
Don't argue with an idiot, first they'll bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
darkxshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:17 PM   #22
Babbles
Diamond Member
 
Babbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: L.A. Area
Posts: 8,206
Default

I have some Ralph Lauren polos and I like how they fit. I think the construction is very solid, heavy weight and nice texture to the weave, and I think the color has held well. I do have a navy blue Ralph Lauren one that is a bit faded, but it is at least five years old and still looks decent. It fits great and am happy with the cut.

I also have a Burberry and while not as heavy as the Ralph Laurens it does still have a great texture and feel to it. Also the color on the Burberry is rock solid; hasn't faded an ounce. The fit is just about perfect.

I have some Banana Republic ones and while I find the fit to be very good, the fabric is a bit thinner. However they have held their color very well.

I had one from Old Navy and found it so-so. Fit wasn't quite right and the fabric was a bit cheap. Had some stuff from H&M but that shit just falls apart in the wash.
__________________
"Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood."
-Marie Curie
Babbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:57 PM   #23
dr150
Diamond Member
 
dr150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Close to Coast
Posts: 5,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkxshade View Post
I like the slim fit Brooks Brothers golden fleece polos. I bought 3 back in 2006 that I still wear today.
I bought some Brooks Brother Golden Fleece polos ($25 after Xmas sale) after researching the fashion forums. The general consensus was that they were the best in terms of quality.

I can confirm they hold their color really well and don't really shrink. They are sturdy as shit and the collar doesn't curl. The fit is large though. I'm an L and bought M--unprecedented for me. The cut is slim and flatters your body really well--especially in the back.

With that said, I prefer the currently hip Original Penguin polos. They fade more but the cut is the best I've found. It tapers as it goes down and gives you a nice V shape. The collar is also the sexiest and is the polo I get most complimented by women. The BB polo is more yuppie looking in comparison.

The RL polos are sturdy but fade WAY TOO FAST. Plus, the tail is toooo damn long--which is the ding most fashionistas give it. It looks stupid hanging out in the back. IMO, both BB and Penguins polos kill RL in most ways that matter to me.

I also really like the Eddie Bauer Pima polos. Well made and cut in a flattering way.
dr150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 11:00 PM   #24
PhoKingGuy
Diamond Member
 
PhoKingGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,585
Default

I buy American Eagle ones on sale for 10-15 each. They last a few years and don't get beat up looking. They look decent to boot, im happy.
__________________
AT Garage VW/BMW Fanclub Member


Official member of the Frat Boy Club

Quote:
Originally Posted by BudAshes View Post
You act like the government knows more than anyone else. Our government is full of retards that know nothing.
PhoKingGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 11:05 PM   #25
MJinZ
Diamond Member
 
MJinZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amdhunter View Post
The Ralph Lauren ones make me look thinner than I really am somehow. That's why I like them. Dark RL's FTW.
In other news, black clothes are thinning.
__________________

MJinZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.