Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Networking

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

View Poll Results: Where should I look for a NAS?
Dlink 0 0%
Buffalo 0 0%
Other (specify) 4 100.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2010, 10:33 PM   #1
Obsoleet
Platinum Member
 
Obsoleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,184
Default Best cheap home NAS option (RAID1), Dlink or Buffalo?

Looking at two options, the D-Link DNS-321 or the LinkStation Duo LS-WXL/1D. It doesn't mean much but I use the Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 with Tomato and I love it. Scared to go to gigabit and N because that thing is so good. So I'm leaning towards the Linkstation 1GB then putting my existing 1GB drive in it for RAID. I'm going to be hooking what I get up to my TV's USB for streaming, and using it over my 100mb switch for backups / mp3s / movies. My TV tends to stream best when using USB.. it doesn't like to FF/RWD over the network, even though having it connected to my PC through USB would be ideal.
__________________
Linus on Nvidia
Obsoleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 08:56 AM   #2
ViviTheMage
Lifer
 
ViviTheMage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 35,210
Default

prices seem to vary, but you have a lot more capabilities with this little guy :

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2021752

then you do with any old NAS.
__________________
Mad Genius Hosting -Web hosting, Cloud VPS, and Dedicated solutions...
30% off ALL services : AT30-vivi

vivi's blog

238-0-0
ViviTheMage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 09:35 AM   #3
JackMDS
Super Moderator
Elite Member
 
JackMDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 26,389
Default

Maybe this can Help, http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2040351



__________________
Jack
Microsoft, MVP - Networking.

Last edited by JackMDS; 04-08-2010 at 04:52 PM.
JackMDS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 02:22 PM   #4
Obsoleet
Platinum Member
 
Obsoleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,184
Default

I don't want a full PC for a NAS. I want something low power, at minimal as possible, with as few PARTS as possible to eliminate points of failure.
I'm not sure what the workingbrain.net link is for.

I've looked really hard at the 2.5" drive based NAS units from Buffalo, and I forget the figures for power draw, but it's VERY low under load and idle. That's what I'm looking for, but 1TB and up drives in 2.5" format are very expensive. I already have a 1TB drive available.

The Intel NAS unit has a 250watt PSU, does more than I'd need by far. Building an old PC into a NAS unit is another bad idea, for me, due to the thoughts I detailed above.

It's like turning a PC into a router. I'm not into that. I'll keep my low-power Buffalo router on all the time instead. Other people feel differently but I pay my bills (including power).
__________________
Linus on Nvidia
Obsoleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 03:51 PM   #5
coolVariable
Diamond Member
 
coolVariable's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsoleet View Post
I don't want a full PC for a NAS. I want something low power, at minimal as possible, with as few PARTS as possible to eliminate points of failure.
I'm not sure what the workingbrain.net link is for.

I've looked really hard at the 2.5" drive based NAS units from Buffalo, and I forget the figures for power draw, but it's VERY low under load and idle. That's what I'm looking for, but 1TB and up drives in 2.5" format are very expensive. I already have a 1TB drive available.

The Intel NAS unit has a 250watt PSU, does more than I'd need by far. Building an old PC into a NAS unit is another bad idea, for me, due to the thoughts I detailed above.

It's like turning a PC into a router. I'm not into that. I'll keep my low-power Buffalo router on all the time instead. Other people feel differently but I pay my bills (including power).
What you are saying doesn't make much sense.
The cheapest solution for a NAS is a used desktop. No low power system can make up for the upfront price difference.
A "low power" NAS will save you maybe $10 in electricity PER YEAR.
__________________
"You only get rich by the money you don't spend."
cool°
Variable

AnandTech! How about an article about the issues with AMD AHCI driver performance?
coolVariable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 04:58 PM   #6
JackMDS
Super Moderator
Elite Member
 
JackMDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 26,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obsoleet View Post
I'm not sure what the workingbrain.net link is for.
Sorry copy and paste mistake.

The main issue is that.

1. The Stand alone NAS', even when they are rated Giga speed are significantly slower in the Network transfer than a computer with Giga NIC (same about 100Mb/sec. rating).

2. The Stand alone NAS' are using propriety OS (firmware) and at times can be none compatible with some aspects of Windows File formats.



__________________
Jack
Microsoft, MVP - Networking.
JackMDS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 09:22 PM   #7
Obsoleet
Platinum Member
 
Obsoleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,184
Default

Thanks for the info. I'm going to keep looking. I understand the power differences, but I know a 250watt power supply vs a 2.5" NAS in RAID1 is about 15watts (max).
That's a large difference.

If I were to have a small PC that did everything (router + NAS) I would go for that. But I really like the router I have now and don't want to mess with that.

I guess my main thing is having something small, quiet, low failure point count, and something I can place next to my TV with those features. I want to connect the USB port from one to my TV for streaming.

Interesting on the network transfer speeds on the stand-alone NAS boxes. Doesn't surprise me.
I'm going to keep looking around.
__________________
Linus on Nvidia
Obsoleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 10:23 PM   #8
Obsoleet
Platinum Member
 
Obsoleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,184
Default

Would a rational option, being as most gigabit NICs in standalone NAS units sucking, be to buy a USB3 RAID1 external, hooking it to my main PC and just sharing that over the network? Obviously I'd need the PC on to access it, but when I did, I'm guessing I'd get better speeds out of it (using gigabit that is, which I don't have right now). I might just do that, and manually hook it up thru USB3 to backup laptops.
__________________
Linus on Nvidia
Obsoleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.