Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Consumer Electronics > Audio/Video & Home Theater

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2010, 11:54 PM   #1
rh71
Lifer
 
rh71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 48,418
Default lcd tvs: how much does hz matter?

asking for someone:

what's the major difference between 60hz and 120hz for lcd tvs? obviously 120hz is better being that there won't be a lag/blur on the picture but i've read reviews where people say 120hz makes it seem too digitized (not real). and price difference between 60 and 120 is close to $250-300. i know they are even starting to come out with 240hz so anything i buy will be outdated soon anyway, just don't know if its worth paying the extra money if i will barely even notice the difference.
__________________
My X5 | ovechkinfans.com | Random Pics
rh71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 12:13 AM   #2
3chordcharlie
Diamond Member
 
3chordcharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,583
Default

Don't confuse 120hz with 'motion compensation/interpolation/whatever'. A lot of people, including me, find this setting really annoying. It can also be turned off.

As far as I can tell, the only benefit is true 24fps instead of 3:2 pulldown (because 24 frames goes evenly into 120, but not into 60). 240hz shouldn't really change this.

I find 3:2 pulldown slightly distracting on large TV sets, but don't really notice it on ~32" sets. That's just me though. Some people find it 'awful', others don't see it at all.
3chordcharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 08:33 AM   #3
kalrith
Diamond Member
 
kalrith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 6,586
Default

3chordcharlie has it right. For TVs the 120Hz feature ONLY makes a difference when displaying 24fps content, and all it does is remove the 3:2 pulldown. If they tried to sell a TV for $300 more that looked the exact same in the store, that would be a hard sell. Therefore, they couple it with some sort of motion-interpolation mumbo jumbo that most of us despise because of its artificial (or digitized as the OP said) look.

So, you'd spend $300 more on a 120Hz TV, turn off motion interpolation, and only notice the difference for 24fps content. I don't think it's worth the price jump. For that price increase, you could get the next screen size up, and you would most definitely notice that difference.
__________________
Heatware 24+ eBay 22+

Last edited by kalrith; 01-29-2010 at 08:59 AM.
kalrith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 06:00 AM   #4
rh71
Lifer
 
rh71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 48,418
Default

thx guys good info
__________________
My X5 | ovechkinfans.com | Random Pics
rh71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 10:43 AM   #5
Homer Simpson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 581
Default

my parents bought a sammy 46 LED LCD that i think was 120 (i dont think it was 240 but dont recall). when i went home for xmas i checked it out. it seems the marketing of 120/240 being smoother is just that, marketing. when i enabled it, it made the picture look awful. maybe it does work for 24fps sources, but when watching regular old hd cable, yuck. btw, i like my plasma
__________________
Intel 4930K @ 4.4 | Asus Rampage IV Black Edition X79 | Gigabyte 780Ti 3GB SLI | Crucial Ballistix 16GB @1866 | Samsung 840 Pro 512GB | 2x WD Black 1TB RAID0 | Corsair AX1200i | Coolermaster HAF XB | BenQ BL2710 1440p
Intel 3770K @ 4.6 | Asus Maximus V Formula Z77 | Zotac 670 4GB SLI | Samsung 16GB @1866 | 2x Samsung 840 Evo 256 RAID0 | Corsair HX750 | Coolermaster HAF XB | BenQ BL2710 1440p
Heatware
Homer Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 05:40 PM   #6
djnsmith7
Platinum Member
 
djnsmith7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,562
Default

The 120 / 240 Hz displays, as far as marketing is concerned, is intended to smooth out action / sporting scenes where there's constant movement. The problem is, when the technology works, whatever is on the screen almost looks fake. It's like the display is working too hard to display something soft.

Each time I did a side by side comparison with a 120 Hz LCD & plasma, I found myself thinking that the movie on the LCD looked like a soap opera, whereas the movie on the plasma looked like a movie. Blu Ray movies were used for the testing.
__________________
i5-2500K @ 4.5 | ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-Z | VisionTek 7970 w/ Swiftech WB
16 GB Ripjaws Z DDR3-1600 | CaseLabs MH10 + Pedestal | XSPC EX560 + EX420
XSPC D5 | XSPC Photon 270 | XSPC Raystorm | Corsair Force3 120 GB SSD | 1500w
djnsmith7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 03:51 PM   #7
OutHouse
Lifer
 
OutHouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 30,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djnsmith7 View Post
The 120 / 240 Hz displays, as far as marketing is concerned, is intended to smooth out action / sporting scenes where there's constant movement. The problem is, when the technology works, whatever is on the screen almost looks fake. It's like the display is working too hard to display something soft
im not sure i agree with that. my friend has a samsung 46" 240, to me the picture looks awesome. we watched a avs game over the weekend and it looked great. i plan on getting a TV like his wheni get my tax refund.

I have gone to the local AV store and they had a display up showing the difference between 60,120,240 and there is a difference between 120 & 240
OutHouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 04:02 PM   #8
kalrith
Diamond Member
 
kalrith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 6,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OutHouse View Post
im not sure i agree with that. my friend has a samsung 46" 240, to me the picture looks awesome. we watched a avs game over the weekend and it looked great. i plan on getting a TV like his wheni get my tax refund.

I have gone to the local AV store and they had a display up showing the difference between 60,120,240 and there is a difference between 120 & 240
The TVs themselves can be good TVs; however, the motion-interpolation feature is often greatly disliked. It's possible that your friend had it turned off. The main point in this thread is that they're not worth the several-hundred-dollar price premium over 60 Hz TVs.
__________________
Heatware 24+ eBay 22+
kalrith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 04:10 PM   #9
OutHouse
Lifer
 
OutHouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 30,257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalrith View Post
The TVs themselves can be good TVs; however, the motion-interpolation feature is often greatly disliked. It's possible that your friend had it turned off. The main point in this thread is that they're not worth the several-hundred-dollar price premium over 60 Hz TVs.
i dunno, ive seen some 60hz that had motion blur and to me it is worth it. you get what you pay for right?
OutHouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:17 PM   #10
Jeff7181
Lifer
 
Jeff7181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,198
Default

Lemme ask a question that's been debated in the PC gaming world for years now...

If your source is only 30 fps, what good does it do to have a display capable of 60, 120 or 240 Hz? I mean... if the source video only contains 30 fps, a 30 Hz TV will show every frame once per second. If you have a 60 Hz TV, it will show every frame twice per second... but the image is still on the screen for 1/30th of a second regardless of how many times your TV is refreshing the same image. So... I'm a little confused why anybody cares about this (besides the marketing people that get to publish bigger numbers). I mean... if I've only got 30 images to show you in 1 second, it doesn't matter if you look 30 times or 240 times, you're only going to see 30 different images.
__________________
"The Universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." - Lawrence Krauss
Jeff7181 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:26 PM   #11
3chordcharlie
Diamond Member
 
3chordcharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff7181 View Post
Lemme ask a question that's been debated in the PC gaming world for years now...

If your source is only 30 fps, what good does it do to have a display capable of 60, 120 or 240 Hz? I mean... if the source video only contains 30 fps, a 30 Hz TV will show every frame once per second. If you have a 60 Hz TV, it will show every frame twice per second... but the image is still on the screen for 1/30th of a second regardless of how many times your TV is refreshing the same image. So... I'm a little confused why anybody cares about this (besides the marketing people that get to publish bigger numbers). I mean... if I've only got 30 images to show you in 1 second, it doesn't matter if you look 30 times or 240 times, you're only going to see 30 different images.
But what if you only have 24 images?

Motion compensation means you are actually being shown 120 or 240 images per second. I think it looks like junk, and should be left turned off, but it's not quite like you said.
__________________
Similes are like metaphors.
3chordcharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:34 PM   #12
Jeff7181
Lifer
 
Jeff7181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3chordcharlie View Post
But what if you only have 24 images?

Motion compensation means you are actually being shown 120 or 240 images per second. I think it looks like junk, and should be left turned off, but it's not quite like you said.
In that case, why wouldn't the TV switch to a 24 Hz refresh rate?
__________________
"The Universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." - Lawrence Krauss
Jeff7181 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:54 PM   #13
3chordcharlie
Diamond Member
 
3chordcharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff7181 View Post
In that case, why wouldn't the TV switch to a 24 Hz refresh rate?
TVs don't adjust refresh rates. I'm sure there's a technical reason for this; all I know is they don't.
__________________
Similes are like metaphors.
3chordcharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 11:04 PM   #14
Jeff7181
Lifer
 
Jeff7181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 18,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3chordcharlie View Post
TVs don't adjust refresh rates. I'm sure there's a technical reason for this; all I know is they don't.
Well they should. Rather than increasing the refresh rate to many multiples of the frame rate of the source video... seems rather stupid if you're going to leave the source video at 24 or 30 fps.
__________________
"The Universe is huge and old and rare things happen all the time, including life." - Lawrence Krauss
Jeff7181 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.