Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Software > Operating Systems

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2005, 06:21 AM   #1
PeteRoy
Senior Member
 
PeteRoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 940
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I installed Windows 95 on my old Pentium 2 just for the kick of it.

And hell, Windows 95 is one tough OS with drivers, it can be a pain to install video card drivers.

When I used win95 back when I was 14 and I didn't notice how horrible it is, but after 7 years of not using it I now realise how horrible it is.

Anyone still using Win95?
__________________
Read my Blog
Listen to this guy
PeteRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 06:59 AM   #2
drag
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,708
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I use win95 at work. It's a old machine that is nothing more then a OS to run a email client and terminal emulator.

Don't like it, nobody likes it, so I get stuck with it because I don't realy need it anyways. Looks like it will get replaced with a old win2000 box in a couple months. (I am conspiring with the IT people to get Linux on it, but it needs to run the Email client of choice... Eudora. But currently they are trying to convince people to migrate over to Thunderbird since it's nicer on system resources (once people get 500+ emails) and since that runs on Linux...)
drag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 07:08 AM   #3
KoolDrew
Lifer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,224
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I have a 200MHz Pentium MMX machine here with 95 on it. I don't use it though. I may do something with it like s small file server or something. No entirely sure though.
KoolDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 07:34 AM   #4
PeteRoy
Senior Member
 
PeteRoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 940
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

It gives me tough times with IDE Controller installation.
__________________
Read my Blog
Listen to this guy
PeteRoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 12:20 PM   #5
Canterwood
Golden Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,138
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Had 95A on the my work PC up till about 18 months ago. Couldn't use USB and only had 2gb Fat Hard disk space.

All because we had some old app that only ran on 95A. POS, kept blue screening whenever I tried copying files across the network.

Thankfully we've upgraded to Win2000 now, and things are much much better.
Canterwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 12:37 PM   #6
geldor1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 591
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I got a system here at work running Win 3.11 WFW.

It's the only way we could get a system to log into a vendor's Netware Lite PC and pull down files.

Now there was a workhorse of an OS.
__________________
Heat 122-0-0
Ebay 614-0-0
All the darkness of the world can not put out the light of one small candle.
geldor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 12:51 PM   #7
Bozo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 701
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I use the CD for a coaster :laugh:

Bozo
Bozo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 02:15 PM   #8
VirtualLarry
Lifer
 
VirtualLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 25,020
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Some arcade machines, run on Win95 (perhaps OSR2). Believe it or not...
__________________
Rig(s) not listed, because I change computers, like some people change their socks.
ATX is for poor people. And 'gamers.' - phucheneh
haswell is bulldozer... - aigomorla
"DON'T BUY INTEL, they will send secret signals down the internet, which
will considerably slow down your computer". - SOFTengCOMPelec
VirtualLarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 04:23 PM   #9
shortylickens
No Lifer
 
shortylickens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 53,541
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: PeteRoy
I installed Windows 95 on my old Pentium 2 just for the kick of it.

And hell, Windows 95 is one tough OS with drivers, it can be a pain to install video card drivers.

When I used win95 back when I was 14 and I didn't notice how horrible it is, but after 7 years of not using it I now realise how horrible it is.

Anyone still using Win95?
You didnt notice it because you were probably moving up from a bare DOS install or Win 3.11. Back then Win 95 seemed so cool.

I dont use it at all. I upgrade enough until I think the machine will run Win 98. Its still a decent choice for a low-end computer if you dont want to mess with Linux.

I can build a complete system for $175 (using pricewatch.com) and install one of the many copies of Windows 98 floating around my home. And it runs Office 2000 just fine.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lean L View Post
I'm getting sick of navigating this tech forum. Since when do nerds speak in parables and passive aggressive tones?

Say what your observation is or move on... I keep saying it and I'll say it again. These posts add absolutely no value besides a +1 to your post count.
shortylickens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 04:57 PM   #10
daniel49
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,806
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: geldor1
I got a system here at work running Win 3.11 WFW.

It's the only way we could get a system to log into a vendor's Netware Lite PC and pull down files.

Now there was a workhorse of an OS.
holy punchcards batman
__________________
A great civilization is not conquered from without.
Until it has been destroyed from within.
Will Durant

thanks for Recycling congress in 2010.
Now lets take out the rest of the trash in 2012!
daniel49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2005, 09:19 PM   #11
imported_jambo
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

oh hot dang! i have a Compaq Prolinea 4/66, 24 meg ram (early ninties). it runs 98, the reason I upgraded from 95 was network support.
imported_jambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 05:46 AM   #12
geldor1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 591
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: daniel49

holy punchcards batman

What.....

I remember writing programs on punchcards.

Ahhh... the 70's.
__________________
Heat 122-0-0
Ebay 614-0-0
All the darkness of the world can not put out the light of one small candle.
geldor1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 12:37 PM   #13
Link19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 971
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

The whole Windows 95/98/ME family of operating systems was a POS!! I can't believe to this day that video card makers (NVIDIA and ATI) still actually update drivers for those POS operating systems to support the latest video cards! I mean it's the year 2005!! What place do high end vdieo cards have for support on such POS operating systems that can't even manage large amounts of RAM without severe stability loss. Support for Windows 98/ME should have been ditched 3 years ago when it comes to high end games and programs. I find it ammusingly ridiculous that those POS operating systems are still supported to this day. If you have a need to run old games and DOS programs, why not just USE AN EMULATOR IN wINDOWS 2000/xp OR USE AN OLD pc WITH wINDOWS 98 ON it? But I mean Windows 98/ME have no place for modern hardware and software.
Link19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 04:52 PM   #14
Philippine Mango
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,594
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Link19
The whole Windows 95/98/ME family of operating systems was a POS!! I can't believe to this day that video card makers (NVIDIA and ATI) still actually update drivers for those POS operating systems to support the latest video cards! I mean it's the year 2005!! What place do high end vdieo cards have for support on such POS operating systems that can't even manage large amounts of RAM without severe stability loss. Support for Windows 98/ME should have been ditched 3 years ago when it comes to high end games and programs. I find it ammusingly ridiculous that those POS operating systems are still supported to this day. If you have a need to run old games and DOS programs, why not just USE AN EMULATOR IN wINDOWS 2000/xp OR USE AN OLD pc WITH wINDOWS 98 ON it? But I mean Windows 98/ME have no place for modern hardware and software.
your pretty young arentcha? It's actually nice of the video companies to support those operating systems because there are still Windows 98 and ME machines out there FYI. I think windows 98 machines make up 10% of the computer population out there so it only makes sense to support it. Windows ME was on machines all the way up to P4 2.0GHZ and thats actually quite fast. So it would only make sense for ATI and Nvidia to support those operating systems. Your almost as bad as MS because they wanted to ditch 98 support a while back.. Its a GOOD thing for a company to support an operating system for a long time...
Philippine Mango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 06:34 PM   #15
vegetation
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,270
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Link19
The whole Windows 95/98/ME family of operating systems was a POS!! I can't believe to this day that video card makers (NVIDIA and ATI) still actually update drivers for those POS operating systems to support the latest video cards! I mean it's the year 2005!! What place do high end vdieo cards have for support on such POS operating systems that can't even manage large amounts of RAM without severe stability loss. Support for Windows 98/ME should have been ditched 3 years ago when it comes to high end games and programs. I find it ammusingly ridiculous that those POS operating systems are still supported to this day. If you have a need to run old games and DOS programs, why not just USE AN EMULATOR IN wINDOWS 2000/xp OR USE AN OLD pc WITH wINDOWS 98 ON it? But I mean Windows 98/ME have no place for modern hardware and software.
Windows 98 is very heavily still in use in the population. Let's put it this way, there are far more active win98 users than all Macs ever sold. So yes, there's a market for them.

vegetation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 09:27 PM   #16
Link19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 971
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
your pretty young arentcha? It's actually nice of the video companies to support those operating systems because there are still Windows 98 and ME machines out there FYI. I think windows 98 machines make up 10% of the computer population out there so it only makes sense to support it. Windows ME was on machines all the way up to P4 2.0GHZ and thats actually quite fast. So it would only make sense for ATI and Nvidia to support those operating systems. Your almost as bad as MS because they wanted to ditch 98 support a while back.. Its a GOOD thing for a company to support an operating system for a long time...
If Windows 98/ME were actually based off Windows NT, I'd be all for continued support of them. But because Windows 98/ME are not based off of true 32-bit code, they are POS and should have died a long time ago. I mean WIndows 98/ME aren't even true 32-bit multi tasking operating systems. Those operating systems are the ones that actual gave Windows such a bad name for being awfully unstable and so badly inferrior to all other 32-bit multi tasking operating systems. I'm NO WAY just as bad as MS. I only think support should be ditched for those operating systems in Windows 98/ME because the video card companies could proably come out with more stable and better drivers because the architecture of Windows 2000/XP is completely different than Windows 98/ME.

I'm NOT almost as bad as MS. MS wanted to drop support for Windows 98 because they love forcing people to upgrade at the expesne of your pocket. I think support for Windows 98 should be dicthed because it is an inferrior piece of junk OS. I mean Windows 2000 is older than Windows XP, but I think Windows 2000 deserves a great deal of support because it is still a great OS that I find respectable. I mean I think Microsoft should have ditched support for Windows 98/ME a long time ago. However, I think there should be a Service Pack 5 for Windows 2000 and it should still be fully supported by Microsoft as well as all hardware and software manufacturers. I mean Microsoft actually wants to drop support for Windows 2000 relatively soon. I think Windows 2000 is still a great OS and should still be supported for a long time. I only think poeple running Windows 98/ME should upgrade because those OSs are POS. But if you are running Windows 2000, you shouldn't have to upgrade because Windows 2000 is a quality OS.
Link19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 09:34 PM   #17
Link19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 971
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Windows 98 is very heavily still in use in the population. Let's put it this way, there are far more active win98 users than all Macs ever sold. So yes, there's a market for them.
But how many of those Windows 98 users have a system that actually meet the requirements for such high end video cards and games? I doubt very many. And why would anyone want to run WIndows 98/ME on a high end system as their primary OS is beyond me?
Link19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 09:38 PM   #18
n0cmonkey
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 42,936
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: vegetation
Quote:
Originally posted by: Link19
The whole Windows 95/98/ME family of operating systems was a POS!! I can't believe to this day that video card makers (NVIDIA and ATI) still actually update drivers for those POS operating systems to support the latest video cards! I mean it's the year 2005!! What place do high end vdieo cards have for support on such POS operating systems that can't even manage large amounts of RAM without severe stability loss. Support for Windows 98/ME should have been ditched 3 years ago when it comes to high end games and programs. I find it ammusingly ridiculous that those POS operating systems are still supported to this day. If you have a need to run old games and DOS programs, why not just USE AN EMULATOR IN wINDOWS 2000/xp OR USE AN OLD pc WITH wINDOWS 98 ON it? But I mean Windows 98/ME have no place for modern hardware and software.
Windows 98 is very heavily still in use in the population. Let's put it this way, there are far more active win98 users than all Macs ever sold. So yes, there's a market for them.
Link of your source please.
__________________
freakangels | HFC
n0cmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 01:40 AM   #19
Philippine Mango
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,594
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

n0c, it's true.... 10% of the computing world is still using Windows 98 so that would be more then the mac population period.
Philippine Mango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 09:29 AM   #20
Link19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 971
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
n0c, it's true.... 10% of the computing world is still using Windows 98 so that would be more then the mac population period.

I bet that 99.99% of that 10% of the population that are still using Windows 98 have computers with CPUs 600MHz or slower. In NO WAY should such POS operating systems like Windows 98/ME be supported on software and hardware that has a minimum system requirments of a 1GHz or faster CPU!
Link19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 09:50 AM   #21
drag
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,708
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

I'd bet that it would be much more accurate that Win98 stats are closer to 5% then 10%.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

A couple years ago many many people used Win98, but since then most people bought new computers.
drag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 11:54 AM   #22
dderolph
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 618
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
I bet that 99.99% of that 10% of the population that are still using Windows 98 have computers with CPUs 600MHz or slower. In NO WAY should such POS operating systems like Windows 98/ME be supported on software and hardware that has a minimum system requirments of a 1GHz or faster CPU!
Ridiculous statement. I used Win 98SE with a 1.8GHz CPU, 512MB RAM; still have it on that machine under a dual boot configuration with Win XP. Win 98SE runs fine on that system; runs stable. And, it can be used with faster CPUs; there's no ceiling on CPU speed that it will run on.
dderolph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 12:21 PM   #23
Philippine Mango
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,594
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Quote:
Originally posted by: Link19
Quote:
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
n0c, it's true.... 10% of the computing world is still using Windows 98 so that would be more then the mac population period.

I bet that 99.99% of that 10% of the population that are still using Windows 98 have computers with CPUs 600MHz or slower. In NO WAY should such POS operating systems like Windows 98/ME be supported on software and hardware that has a minimum system requirments of a 1GHz or faster CPU!
Well look at intel's website, downloads for the intel 875P chipset drivers are here:http://support.intel.com/support/chi.../CS-009242.htm

If you go and "attempt" to download the drivers, it will ask for your operating system and when you choose 98SE, it goes to a page where you can download them. So it clearly shows that intel thinks its worth it to support older operating systems. Hell trying it agian with plain old windows 95 and theres a driver for that too! Albiet old but it's still good, same thing applies with the original version of windows 98..
Philippine Mango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 02:12 PM   #24
Carrot44
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Palouse Washington
Posts: 1,763
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

Windows 95 has been out 10 years now? Win 98 breads have been out about 8 or so years. I bet in 10 years you will be saying that Windows XP is a POS
__________________
Talk will not cook your rice but it may cook your goose.
8 + years and no mod quote
Carrot44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 03:02 PM   #25
Philippine Mango
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,594
Default Anyone still using Windows 95?

People don't realize that a computer with windows 98 can do practically anything anyone would need it to do. Photo editing, gaming (even newer games), office related stuff, anything. The only need for windows XP is for security but otherwise windows 98 is fine since they aren't making as many new viruses for these older platforms.
Philippine Mango is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.