Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-18-2014, 11:27 AM   #51
IGBT
Lifer
 
IGBT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 16,776
Default

everybody know it's a hoax. The East Anglia emails should have ended this grift. The liberals desperately want to keep the tax payer funded grant money flowing so they can study nothing endlessly.
__________________
"Under my plan, energy prices would naturally skyrocket" - Barrack Hussein Obama.
gas was $1.84 a gallon prior to obama inauguration. The price of ALL goods and services (food) are tied to the price of transportation energy.
IGBT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 11:53 AM   #52
Whiskey16
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oak Bay, BC
Posts: 1,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IGBT View Post
everybody know it's a hoax. The East Anglia emails should have ended this grift. The liberals desperately want to keep the tax payer funded grant money flowing so they can study nothing endlessly.
Hyperbolic and lying troll......

Coincidently, that 5 year old article referred to in my previous post concerning 'Manufactured Deceit,' directly refuted the long lambasted 'East Anglia email' argument....

Quote:
The contrarians and the hacked CRU emails

A hacker broke into an email server at the Climate Research Unit of the UK's University of East Anglia last week and posted ten years worth of private email exchanges between leading scientists who've published research linking humans to climate change. Naturally, the contrarians have seized upon this golden opportunity, and are working hard to discredit several of these scientists. You'll hear claims by some contrarians that the emails discovered invalidate the whole theory of human-caused global warming. Well, all I can say is, consider the source. We can trust the contrarians to say whatever is in the best interests of the fossil fuel industry. What I see when I read the various stolen emails and explanations posted at Realclimate.org is scientists acting as scientists--pursuing the truth. I can see no clear evidence that calls into question the scientific validity of the research done by the scientists victimized by the stolen emails. There is no sign of a conspiracy to alter data to fit a pre-conceived ideological view. Rather, I see dedicated scientists attempting to make the truth known in face of what is probably the world's most pervasive and best-funded disinformation campaign against science in history.
IGBT, you are perpetuating a lie. Caught lying. You are a shill. Here is further proof as you hang onto the those emails for your argument:

Quote:
Debunking Misinformation About Stolen Climate Emails in the "Climategate" Manufactured Controversy

The manufactured controversy over emails stolen from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit has generated a lot more heat than light. The email content being quoted does not indicate that climate data and research have been compromised. Most importantly, nothing in the content of these stolen emails has any impact on our overall understanding that human activities are driving dangerous levels of global warming. Media reports and contrarian claims that they do are inaccurate.
Investigations Clear Scientists of Wrongdoing
Six official investigations have cleared scientists of accusations of wrongdoing.Other agencies and media outlets have investigated the substance of the emails.
For further validated support:

Quote:
"Mike's Nature trick" and "hide the decline"

The most quoted email is from Phil Jones discussing paleo-data used to reconstruct past temperatures (emphasis mine):
"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
"Mike's Nature trick" refers to a technique (aka "trick of the trade") used in a paper published in Nature by lead author Michael Mann (Mann 1998). The "trick" is the technique of plotting recent instrumental data along with the reconstructed data. This places recent global warming trends in the context of temperature changes over longer time scales.
The most common misconception regarding this email is the assumption that "decline" refers to declining temperatures. It actually refers to a decline in the reliability of tree rings to reflect temperatures after 1960. This is known as the "divergence problem" where tree ring proxies diverge from modern instrumental temperature records after 1960. The divergence problem is discussed in the peer reviewed literature as early as 1995, suggesting a change in the sensitivity of tree growth to temperature in recent decades (Briffa 1998). It is also examined more recently in Wilmking 2008 which explores techniques in eliminating the divergence problem. So when you look at Phil Jone's email in the context of the science discussed, it is not the schemings of a climate conspiracy but technical discussions of data handling techniques available in the peer reviewed literature. More on the hockey stick divergence problem...
Trenberth's "travesty we can't account for the lack of warming"

The second most cited email is from climate scientist and IPCC lead author Kevin Trenberth. The highlighted quote is this: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." This has been most commonly interpreted (among skeptics) as climate scientists secretly admitting amongst themselves that global warming really has stopped. Trenberth is actually discussing a paper he'd recently published that discusses the planet's energy budget - how much net energy is flowing into our climate and where it's going (Trenberth 2009).
In Trenberth's paper, he discusses how we know the planet is continually heating due to increasing carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, surface temperature sometimes shows short term cooling periods. This is due to internal variability and Trenberth was lamenting that our observation systems can't comprehensively track all the energy flow through the climate system. More on Trenberth's travesty...
As the sourly discredited OP, Micheal1980, you're not interested in truth, accuracy, honesty, nor science.


Last edited by Whiskey16; 05-18-2014 at 11:56 AM.
Whiskey16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 12:34 PM   #53
Subyman
Platinum Member
 
Subyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 2,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IGBT View Post
everybody know it's a hoax. The East Anglia emails should have ended this grift. The liberals desperately want to keep the tax payer funded grant money flowing so they can study nothing endlessly.
Yes, she represents all scientists and all work ever done in climate modeling and extrapolation. Everyone was on her mailing list getting instructions from our hive mother.
__________________
Heat Rating
Main Rig: Corsair 550D Watercooled
4820k | Asus Rampage Gene IV | GSkill 2x8GB | 2x MSI Gaming GTX 970 SLI
Intel 120GB SSD | Seasonic 660 Plat | ROG Swift PG278Q
Subyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 12:48 PM   #54
Rakehellion
Diamond Member
 
Rakehellion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michal1980 View Post
Do they allow peer review of the new work? Nope.
Quote:
Originally Posted by michal1980 View Post
Like I said, peer review is bunk

Are you fucking brain damaged?
Rakehellion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2014, 01:58 PM   #55
Thebobo
Diamond Member
 
Thebobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,088
Default

Peer review means Fox approved
Thebobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.