Coulter fires opening shot in GOP Civil War - Page 5

techs · 11-09-2012, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarchist420

The GOP being too moderate was the problem. If they don't pick moderate candidates, then they increase their popularity. Moderation is the root of the problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrByte

are you serious?

He is. 100 percent.
The righties have gone for a ride on the crazy bus and they won't get off.

Moonbeam · 11-09-2012, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atreus21

I'll make one and then stop so as not to thread-jack.

Now that I think about it, I think there is a valid "it rubs me wrong" argument. Dennis Prager's. He said that at its basis it blurs or entirely eliminates the difference between men and women. It necessarily challenges that any such difference exists, and that's counter to the truth. This is as much a case against homosexuality as against homosexual marriage, but I'm not in favor of disallowing homosexuality. Let people have sex with whom they please, but to the extent that this behavior receives societal sanction, it should be restricted.

If leftists are searching for a motive to expose, that is a good motive to have.

For God's sake please start your thread on this topic where you can fully explain how rational your opinions are. I can't wait to watch CK tell you what I've told you in his way since he seems not to understand what I say until he's said it. I hope especially you remember the part about the icky factor. How many years now have I been telling you that. But wait, what the hell am I doing. I really don't care. The blind are blind and there's nothing I can do about it.

Moonbeam · 11-09-2012, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by techs

He is. 100 percent.
The righties have gone for a ride on the crazy bus and they won't get off.

It would be asking them to die to their egos. We have watched them double down over and over again. I think Nate Silver would know what to do with that.

techs · 11-09-2012, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonbeam

It would be asking them to die to their egos. We have watched them double down over and over again. I think Nate Silver would know what to do with that.

I would agree with that except Nate Silver already knew I would and beat me to it.

First · 11-09-2012, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atreus21

I'll make one and then stop so as not to thread-jack.

Now that I think about it, I think there is a valid "it rubs me wrong" argument. Dennis Prager's. He said that at its basis it blurs or entirely eliminates the difference between men and women. It necessarily challenges that any such difference exists, and that's counter to the truth. This is as much a case against homosexuality as against homosexual marriage, but I'm not in favor of disallowing homosexuality. Let people have sex with whom they please, but to the extent that this behavior receives societal sanction, it should be restricted.

If leftists are searching for a motive to expose, that is a good motive to have.

Yeah, again, humans are quite intelligent, so any notion that there would be a lack of context as to the role or men and women in society is overwhelmed by human's (I would agree innate) intelligence to distinguish between men and women. You'd have to be very specific as to what actual scenarios are causing this confusion in same-sex households with children. Are they socially impaired? Are they handicapped otherwise? Studies or research to back any of that up? If not, well, your argument becomes purely speculative and not the least bit interesting or creative.

HomerJS · 11-09-2012, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheHateMe

Oh God...it's evolving!

My God! Its the stunt hand from An American Werewolf in London

Steeplerot · 11-09-2012, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerJS

My God! Its the stunt hand from An American Werewolf in London

exactly lol

hal2kilo · 11-09-2012, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerJS

My God! Its the stunt hand from An American Werewolf in London

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/9151/97831209.jpg

Please tell me that's photo shopped. That's just.......wrong.

zinfamous · 11-09-2012, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Generator

There is no Tea Party. It is the definition of a straw man. These right wing nutters have twisted themselves into such a fit that they now will pick fights against illusionary phantoms! Rout this right wing trash into their havens into a few select states. Let them coalesce into some amorphous, Mississippian goo monster of bigotry and dumb-fuckery.

DRIVE THEM INTO THEIR BUNKERS
SQUEEZE THEM INTO THE HILLS
SCARE THEM WITH COMMUNITY SO THEY PICK UP THEIR GUNS
LET THEM KNOW NO BASTION, NO SAFE HAVEN BUT THEIR DEMENTED, BACK WATERED TERRORISM

The right wing trash has been obliterated. Kick them back into the mud!

Finally!

A worthy candidate on these boards to represent the Spidey ethos on the other side of the political spectrum.

Moonbeam · 11-09-2012, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinfamous

Finally!

A worthy candidate on these boards to represent the Spidey ethos on the other side of the political spectrum.

Question is do we need that.

RabidMongoose · 11-09-2012, 07:08 PM

It's time for the Democrats to start funding the more crazy Republicans. Someone needs to set up a super pac to fund the most insane tea party types and fuel their political ambitions.

It's time to drive the GOP into oblivion. Make them nominate the most pro-rape, anti-American diversity, anti-science, anti anything weirdo creeps. Help them with these nominations. Make sure that they are also all old, obese, just generally creepy looking, and make all sorts of racist innuendo.

And unleash them into the GOP and watch them devour the GOP base as the establishment politicians scream in horror as a fat tea party rape creep in a colonial wig and revolutionary militia outfit and musket primaries them out of office.