And some wonder why data encryption is so popular with some people. I guess we should be glad that encryption is still legal for consumers, at least for now.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The Founders put in some fine print though, which is always omitted:
"Should technology ever be developed which makes it very easy to quietly violate the security of someone's personal effects, this amendment will no longer apply."
What part of that isn't clear?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Incorruptible
And this is why we need Ron Paul and small government
|
Yes, that way the private sector could instead pick up some of the data spying market. That data's worth lots of money, but alas, all that value is being wasted by the government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeowKat
Curse words? I dont see any. 
We must stand against this intrusion into our online lives. |
Thankfully, it's easy to fool deities with simple spelling changes. It's not as if the Bible says that thoughts are just as bad as actions.
Just the fact that "unnecessary censorship" clips get a laugh shows that censorship doesn't quite work as planned. The
bleep sound eventually comes to evoke the same thoughts as the word or words which would have originally been spoken, which was supposedly precisely the same thing that the censoring was intended to prevent. Oops.
Sweet holey Jeesus bullschit.
Yea, because that sole action bankrupted America 
