Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > CPUs and Overclocking

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· AMD Video Cards
· Nvidia
· Displays
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Home and Garden
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2008, 01:17 PM   #1
Silllllll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default QX9770 Temperature

Hello everyone, I'm new to this forum and I thought this was a good place to ask for help regarding my problem.
I recently got a QX9770 cpu. I use this on a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mainboard.
However I seem to have very strange temperature readings.
I'm using a Zerotherm Nirvana cooler with artic silver 5 thermal paste. I have remounted the heatsink several times with no improvement.

IDLE TEMPERATURES:
Bios says the temperature is 33C
PC Health monitor(which is a program delivered with the mainboard) 24C
Real Temp 2.5 : Core 0/1 41/41 2/3 32/35C
HWmonitor : Core 0/1 51/51 Core 2/3 42/45 ( The TMPIN1 is 24C which moves in sync with the PC Health monitor cpu temperature)
Core Temp : Core 0/1 51/51 Core 2/3 42/45
Speedfan : Core 0/1 46/46 Core2/3 37/38
Everest : Core 0/1 51/51 Core 2/3 42/44

The heatsink feels cold, I have tried 3 different coolers. I tried my old intel stock cooler for e6700 which resulted in a 48C idle in the bios and 70C+ when running Prime 95

Thermalright IFX-14 was 50C idle in bios (no fans attached) I could potentially blaim this to bad mounting. However seeying how I'm positive the Zerotherm is mounted correctly, this situation confuses me, if anyone could give me any info and help it would be appreciated.
Silllllll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:03 PM   #2
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Real Temp and Speedfan are wrong, the others are correct. 45nm quads run hot.
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:10 PM   #3
Silllllll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default QX9770 Temperature

Thanks for the reply, I was under the impression tho that 45nm were suppose to run less hot then the 65nm ones. On the intel website it says the max temp for a QX9770 should be 55C
Any additional feedback from you and others is more then welcome
Silllllll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:45 PM   #4
zsdersw
Lifer
 
zsdersw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The vicinity of an area adjacent to a location
Posts: 10,560
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Thanks for the reply, I was under the impression tho that 45nm were suppose to run less hot then the 65nm ones.
They do.

__________________
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool -Mark Twain

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand -Milton Friedman

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -Robert J. Hanlon
zsdersw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:47 PM   #5
Silllllll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default QX9770 Temperature

This really boggles my mind then :/
Silllllll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:56 PM   #6
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Thanks for the reply, I was under the impression tho that 45nm were suppose to run less hot then the 65nm ones. On the intel website it says the max temp for a QX9770 should be 55C
Any additional feedback from you and others is more then welcome
Inside your CPU there are 5 thermal sensors, one under each core, and one in the center of the die. The core temps will likely be ~15C higher than the center of the die. Intel is likely stating the CPU temp (Tcase). Around here most people would say 70C is the highest you want your cores to get for 24/7 usage.

Even with the best air cooler at stock settings I'd be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. Tj max on my Q9450 is 105C according to Coretemp, and I believe Coretemp is correct.

My temps, 100% load F@H, 27C ambient:

CPU: 53
Core1: 66
Core2: 66
Core3: 65
Core4: 63
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:05 PM   #7
Idontcare
Elite Member
 
Idontcare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: 台北市
Posts: 21,011
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Thanks for the reply, I was under the impression tho that 45nm were suppose to run less hot then the 65nm ones. On the intel website it says the max temp for a QX9770 should be 55C
Any additional feedback from you and others is more then welcome
You are likely confusing the terms "power consumption" and "temperature".

45nm chips will consume less power than their 65nm analogs. But that doesn't mean their temperatures will be less because temperature is "power density"...a smaller area (smaller chip) dissipating the same power as a larger area (larger chip) will have a higher temperature.
Idontcare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:23 PM   #8
Silllllll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default QX9770 Temperature

Oh wow I did not realise that, thanks alot for clearing this up. Question tho, if the 45nm run around 50C idle, how are people able to overclock them to 4.0ghz without damaging the cpu? Or do they only do this to show off and dial it back to a more accepteble amount?

Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
Silllllll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:44 PM   #9
bryanW1995
Lifer
 
bryanW1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 11,093
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Cutthroat
Real Temp and Speedfan are wrong, the others are correct. 45nm quads run hot.
sorry, you're wrong. real temp and coretemp use the thermal diode inside each individual core to measure temps. so does the latest version of speedfan. however, coretemp believes that tjmax is 105c, speedfan thinks that tjmax is 100c, and realtemp thinks that it is 95c. unclewebb on the xs forums has a LONG thread about this which I'll link to when I'm done, but suffice to say that I believe his program (realtemp) is more likely to be accurate than coretemp or speedfan.

having said all of that, core temps don't mean squat. distance to tjmax is all that matters. change coretemp to display distance to tjmax and it agrees with realtemp (b/c they get their info from the same place). keep your distance to tjmax over 20c and you're good, keep it over 30c and you're golden (all temps at load of course, idle temps are notoriously unreliable and meaningless).

http://www.xtremesystems.org/f...owthread.php?p=2809778

http://www.techpowerup.com/realtemp/
__________________
4770k, NH-D14, 2x256gb m4 Raid 0, xfx 850w, 7970, HAF-x, Z87-pro, 2x8gb, U2713hm
2500k @ 4.54, hyper 212+, ga-z68ma-d2h, wd20ears, 2x4gb ddr3 1600, gtx 480
MSI GT 70 2oc, i7 4700 mq, gtx 770m, 8gb ram, 240gb crucial m500, 750 gb hdd
bryanW1995 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:51 PM   #10
bryanW1995
Lifer
 
bryanW1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 11,093
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Oh wow I did not realise that, thanks alot for clearing this up. Question tho, if the 45nm run around 50C idle, how are people able to overclock them to 4.0ghz without damaging the cpu? Or do they only do this to show off and dial it back to a more accepteble amount?

Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
my hsf's on both my Q9450 and x3350 (xeon equivalent to q9450) are never hot to the touch. also, perhaps more telling, my Q9450 @ 3.6 doesn't seem to increase my room temp any more than my e6750 did. These things do NOT run hot, I very strongly believe that unclewebb has got this figured out (at least as well as ****ing intel will allow anybody not on an nda to figure this out).

ps: coretemp now allows you to introduce an offset. use a -10c offset in coretemp if you are just determined to have your temp monitor display "temp" instead of "distance to tjmax". Just remember that the distance to tjmax is more important. As I've told several posters here recently, it doesn't matter if my Q9450 is at 65c or 75c, it's still 30c below tjmax. That's just as good as running a Q6600 at 65c at 100% load, which at 3.6 on air is VERY difficult to do.
__________________
4770k, NH-D14, 2x256gb m4 Raid 0, xfx 850w, 7970, HAF-x, Z87-pro, 2x8gb, U2713hm
2500k @ 4.54, hyper 212+, ga-z68ma-d2h, wd20ears, 2x4gb ddr3 1600, gtx 480
MSI GT 70 2oc, i7 4700 mq, gtx 770m, 8gb ram, 240gb crucial m500, 750 gb hdd
bryanW1995 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:55 PM   #11
imported_ST
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 733
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Thanks for the reply, I was under the impression tho that 45nm were suppose to run less hot then the 65nm ones. On the intel website it says the max temp for a QX9770 should be 55C
Any additional feedback from you and others is more then welcome
You are likely confusing the terms "power consumption" and "temperature".

45nm chips will consume less power than their 65nm analogs. But that doesn't mean their temperatures will be less because temperature is "power density"...a smaller area (smaller chip) dissipating the same power as a larger area (larger chip) will have a higher temperature.
temperature is still a function of power dissapation / consumption and with the 45nm utilizing less current and voltage, this will in turn lower temps too.

imported_ST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:09 PM   #12
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Bryan, the reason I believe Coretemp, Everest, etc. is correct is because my Q9450 before mods ran about 10C hotter than my E6400 did. I could feel the difference in ambient temps that made in my room. Now that I've gotten my temps down to the same as my E6400 was, my ambient temps are back to normal.

But what Bryan said about delta to Tj max is correct, that's all that really matters.
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:29 PM   #13
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
I can't answer that, too many variables involved. But I can give you my current idle temps. Keep in mind I've lapped my CPU and HSF, and I've removed the CPU clasp, and added washers to the spring screws on my TRUE to increase pressure. I'm using ICD7 for TIM. Ambient temp is 28C, and the side of the case is off.

CPU: 39
Core1: 54
Core2: 54
Core3: 50
Core4: 49
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:34 PM   #14
Idontcare
Elite Member
 
Idontcare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: 台北市
Posts: 21,011
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
That's obviously an unqualified statement which I'm sure was intended to only be valid within certain constraints (such as "assuming stock HSF", etc).

For myself I have many quads which are overclocked to 3.3GHz and at 100% load across all cores they hit 53-55C. When clocked at stock I don't break above 45C.

That's with Tuniq120. YMMV.
Idontcare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:40 PM   #15
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
That's obviously an unqualified statement which I'm sure was intended to only be valid within certain constraints (such as "assuming stock HSF", etc).

For myself I have many quads which are overclocked to 3.3GHz and at 100% load across all cores they hit 53-55C. When clocked at stock I don't break above 45C.

That's with Tuniq120. YMMV.
Of course I am assuming stock conditions, normal ambients, etc. What I was trying to say is 55C core temp at load, even at stock speed, would be a very good temp.
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 10:20 PM   #16
Idontcare
Elite Member
 
Idontcare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: 台北市
Posts: 21,011
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Cutthroat
Quote:
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Quote:
Originally posted by: Silllllll
Also Cutthroat you said you would be surprised if somebody could keep their quad cores below 55C at load. what would be a "normal temp" on idle?
That's obviously an unqualified statement which I'm sure was intended to only be valid within certain constraints (such as "assuming stock HSF", etc).

For myself I have many quads which are overclocked to 3.3GHz and at 100% load across all cores they hit 53-55C. When clocked at stock I don't break above 45C.

That's with Tuniq120. YMMV.
Of course I am assuming stock conditions, normal ambients, etc. What I was trying to say is 55C core temp at load, even at stock speed, would be a very good temp.
Yeah I didn't see your original post (did a quick eye-scan for it but didn't catch me) but I figured there was more to your statement than what was being quoted.
Idontcare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:07 PM   #17
aigomorla
Cases&Cooling Mod
Elite Member
 
aigomorla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Out Singing in the Rain~
Posts: 15,211
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: Cutthroat
What I was trying to say is 55C core temp at load, even at stock speed, would be a very good temp.
mmm... depends on your cooling.

Ask IDC how he would act if he found out his quad was loading on 55C on his vapo, with no - sign in front.

I bet i can guess 4 words:

See Chicken Little Run!
__________________
Have a watercooling question?
Newbies Guide to H20 Coolingl

Anandtech Case and Cooling Moderator
Anandtech's Watercooling God err Mod.
aigomorla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:51 PM   #18
Cutthroat
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,104
Default QX9770 Temperature

Quote:
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Quote:
Originally posted by: Cutthroat
What I was trying to say is 55C core temp at load, even at stock speed, would be a very good temp.
mmm... depends on your cooling.

Ask IDC how he would act if he found out his quad was loading on 55C on his vapo, with no - sign in front.

I bet i can guess 4 words:

See Chicken Little Run!
errr, well I wasn't really thinking of phase-change cooling, but that's a great way to keep your chip running cool.
__________________
Asus P5K Deluxe | Q9450 @ 3.2GHz | 4GB G.SKILL 'PQ' | 300GB Velociraptor | 150GB Raptor | Hitachi 7K1000 750GB external | OCZ GameXStream 700W | BFG OC GTX 280 | Asus Xonar DX | Vista HP x64 | Antec P180
Cutthroat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Alpha 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.