|
|
 |
11-02-2012, 08:44 AM
|
#1
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 26,148
|
How much space on a 16 Gb. flash drive after formatting?
I need to put the data of 3 full DVD's (4.37Gb. each) on flash drives.
Will 16 Gb. drives be large enough?
__________________
The U.S. Post Office the best defense against Prism. It would be impossible to secretly open and scan 160 billion pieces of mail a year.
Ask yourself why certain people want the Post Office to close?
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 09:01 AM
|
#2
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tupelo
Posts: 15,212
|
Should be. My 16GB Mushkin drive has 14.9GB of space formatted as FAT32.
You'd need to format them as NTFS to get around the 2GB filesize limitation.
__________________
Desktop:: 2500K@4.4Ghz, 7870 OC, 16GB RAM, CM690, 120GB SSD, 2.0TB Storage, Win8x64
Server:: A64 3200+, 2GB RAM, 2.25TB, WHS PP3
Laptop:: Macbook Air (2012), 128GB SSD, 8GB RAM
Heatware 154-0-0
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 09:18 AM
|
#3
|
|
AnandTech SSD Editor
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 402
|
16GB is ~14.9GiB (Windows uses GB even though in fact is it GiB), so you should be able to fit three DVDs just fine.
__________________
SSD Editor for AnandTech
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 09:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
Video Cards & Graphics
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,060
|
Here’s the interesting thing: it depends on the manufacturer as to how much is usable.
I have three different brands of 16GB flash drives, and all three have different amounts of usable space. The lowest of the three has 14.4GB.
__________________
i5 2500K | Titan | 16GB DDR3-1600 | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3 | 128GB Samsung 830 | 1TB VelociRaptor | X-Fi XtremeMusic | Seasonic X 560W | Antec 902 | 30" HP LP3065
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 10:01 PM
|
#5
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,628
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFG10K
Here’s the interesting thing: it depends on the manufacturer as to how much is usable.
I have three different brands of 16GB flash drives, and all three have different amounts of usable space. The lowest of the three has 14.4GB.
|
Care to name names?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
|
Main: 3570K + HD7970 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS
NAS and HTPC/workstation: Supermicro MBD-X9SCM + G530 + 16GB ECC; ASUS P8B WS + i3-3220; 1.168TB of Intel/Crucial/Samsung SSDs + 26TB of WD/Hitachi HDDs
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 10:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
Super Moderator
Video Cards & Graphics
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,060
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingcap
Care to name names?
|
Emtec, Imation, Strontium.
__________________
i5 2500K | Titan | 16GB DDR3-1600 | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3 | 128GB Samsung 830 | 1TB VelociRaptor | X-Fi XtremeMusic | Seasonic X 560W | Antec 902 | 30" HP LP3065
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2012, 11:18 PM
|
#7
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,628
|
Hmm, weird, I can understand different levels of OVERprovisioning but to have half a gig go missing in user-accessible space is bizarre.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
|
Main: 3570K + HD7970 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS
NAS and HTPC/workstation: Supermicro MBD-X9SCM + G530 + 16GB ECC; ASUS P8B WS + i3-3220; 1.168TB of Intel/Crucial/Samsung SSDs + 26TB of WD/Hitachi HDDs
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 05:46 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 129
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFG10K
Here’s the interesting thing: it depends on the manufacturer as to how much is usable.
I have three different brands of 16GB flash drives, and all three have different amounts of usable space. The lowest of the three has 14.4GB.
|
have you tried a quick format on them?
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 01:29 AM
|
#9
|
|
Super Moderator
Video Cards & Graphics
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 20,060
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by It's Not Lupus
have you tried a quick format on them?
|
Yes, they've all been reformatted to exFAT. Out of the box they were FAT32.
__________________
i5 2500K | Titan | 16GB DDR3-1600 | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3-B3 | 128GB Samsung 830 | 1TB VelociRaptor | X-Fi XtremeMusic | Seasonic X 560W | Antec 902 | 30" HP LP3065
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 10:09 AM
|
#10
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,436
|
I've noticed that I ALWAYS seem to "lose" space on a flash drive, when I format it in Windows 7. Doesn't matter if I use the HP format tool, or just Windows' built-in format.
Somehow, the mfg is using a FAT32 formatting tool that formats out to more space.
At first, I thought that my testing with vconsole.com 's USB testing (low-level write/read tool) was causing the flash drive to remap bad sectors, and then a subsequent high-level format was showing the effects of that, but when I did that three times to three different flash drives, and their original and new format sizes were identical (Edit: Between the three flash drives - the after format size was smaller than the original though), I realized that it wasn't just bad sectors. (What are the odds that three flash drives have exactly the same number of bad sectors mapped out during a write pass?)
I figure it has to do with the offset that Win7 uses when formatting things, compared to XP and DOS.
__________________
Rig(s) not listed, because I change computers, like some people change their socks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phucheneh
ATX is for poor people. And 'gamers.'
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aigomorla
haswell is bulldozer...
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM.
|
