Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2012
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2012, 10:14 PM   #176
JEDIYoda
Lifer
 
JEDIYoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edro View Post
They are usually illegals or poor people who can't afford a driver's license.
That has to be the most assinine statement of 2012.....
__________________
JohnOfSheffield -- That said, Palestine will exist when they understand that Israel exists, it's that blatantly simple!
JEDIYoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 11:43 PM   #177
Humpy
Senior Member
 
Humpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zinfamous View Post
How is that possible? I know of no place that allows in-person voting anywhere other than your assigned polling location.
Albuquerque / Bernalillo County allowed voters to use any of the available locations. It makes a lot of sense to allow people to vote where it is most convenient.

http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2012/...cs/144042.html
Humpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 07:09 AM   #178
JustMe21
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 92
Default

How about in states where people are required by law to have a government issued photo ID? Since people are supposed to have it anyway, why not require it as a form of validation?
JustMe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 07:23 AM   #179
dank69
Diamond Member
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 7,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalMat View Post
Don't you need to be a citizen of the United States to have these rights?
You're comfortable giving the government the power to force you to obtain a government provided ID in order to qualify as a citizen?
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 09:12 AM   #180
MetalMat
Diamond Member
 
MetalMat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
You're comfortable giving the government the power to force you to obtain a government provided ID in order to qualify as a citizen?
They already do, but I guess in your perfect world everybody just gets along and nobody lies.
__________________
Roger Goodell - Caving in and making the NFL more and more "safe" since 2006

Congrats to the Louisiana-Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns, the 2012 New Orleans Bowl champs!
MetalMat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 09:30 AM   #181
torpid
Lifer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 11,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sixone View Post
Except no one is asking anyone to spend $200 for an ID, not ever and not monthly. The vast majority of Americans have ID already, so that they can drive or cash their paychecks. Inconveniencing the few that don't already have one is not a good reason not to require ID to vote.
You are asking the government to spend money on the free IDs and the new enforcement rules for IDs. And provisional ballot enforcement. It is not free to taxpayers to implement it. With most states severely crunched, it is quite costly a measure to them.
torpid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 12:39 PM   #182
DLeRium
Lifer
 
DLeRium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA
Posts: 17,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainonska511 View Post
But then you'll be using the mail to commit a crime and the postmaster general will come after you....
Correct. There is a SYSTEM in place to prevent voter fraud for mail in voting. Yes the state of CA publishes when they release most of their ballots, and it's kinda ridiculous. You could go burglarize all those mailboxes.

So mail in voting is very susceptible to fraud because the barrier is low. But at least there's a barrier. Some states make you mail in a copy of your ID or something. I remember having to do that in 2004.

Which brings me back to the idea that instead of mail in voting, online voting could be better. Perhaps require two factor authentication or something as an ID check. The easy barrier to breach privacy with mail in voting shows that online voting isn't any worse.
DLeRium is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.