Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > CPUs and Overclocking

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2012
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-08-2012, 03:59 PM   #26
Arkaign
Lifer
 
Arkaign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eureka View Post
Thanks for all the help guys. I think I'm going to try and pick up a cheap CPU off the FS/FT section. I found out my friend probably has at least a gig of DDR2 RAM, so that'll bring me up to 3GB.

Would it matter to move past 667 RAM for an E7400/7500/8400/8500?

And why the video card upgrade? Is the x850xt worth upgrading to a 4850?

I've been using Passmark's benchmarks to compare all these choices, too. The 7500 scores about 1800 stock. A6-5400K scores about 2200. I can't really justify going from a $30 CPU to an entire A6 board setup for $90, and the E7500 is definitely faster than an A4-3400 which scores a 1700. But to be sure, how relevant is Passmark to what I'm look at?
Passmark isn't the best, but those numbers are about right.

667 vs. 800 ddr2 isn't really a big deal, less than 5% gain in most things. It shouldn't be hard to find a 2x2gb 800 pack though for cheap used.

Yes, x850xt to 4850 is a truly staggering upgrade, and will make everything better. It's these generations :

X8xx
X18xx/x19xx
HD2xxx
HD3xxx
HD4xxx

So, 4 generations ahead, drastic improvements in every area. And the upgrade would let you drop Vista, 7, or 8 on the unit with no problems. X8xx aren't fully compatible with 7/8 due to lack of WDDM 1.1. But more than just that, it opens the door to reasonable performance with low/medium details in many recent games. A few of the more high end games like BF3/Crysis3/etc, won't run well on the dual core, but really most titles will run okay with the right settings. And flash with proper acceleration will make the more advanced recent flash games lag/stutter-free.

If you can get a 6670 or so for around the same price, that would even be a better deal. Similar performance, but less power/heat and some newer video acceleration features.

On the Nvidia side, don't get anything less than a 9800GT imho.
__________________
Death is the answer.
Arkaign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 05:54 PM   #27
Hubb1e
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 357
Default

The fm1 and fm2 suggestions are more expensive yes, but that includes a usable video card upgrade.
Hubb1e is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 07:19 PM   #28
SPBHM
Senior Member
 
SPBHM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 951
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eureka View Post
Thanks for all the help guys. I think I'm going to try and pick up a cheap CPU off the FS/FT section. I found out my friend probably has at least a gig of DDR2 RAM, so that'll bring me up to 3GB.

Would it matter to move past 667 RAM for an E7400/7500/8400/8500?

And why the video card upgrade? Is the x850xt worth upgrading to a 4850?

I've been using Passmark's benchmarks to compare all these choices, too. The 7500 scores about 1800 stock. A6-5400K scores about 2200. I can't really justify going from a $30 CPU to an entire A6 board setup for $90, and the E7500 is definitely faster than an A4-3400 which scores a 1700. But to be sure, how relevant is Passmark to what I'm look at?
x850xt is from 2004, with no DX9C support, you can't even start most of the "newer" games, and it doesn't support video acceleration like the newer cards do.

imo it's definitely worth the upgrade, but the 4800 is also getting old by now, it uses to much power for how it performs, and AMD now considers it a "legacy support product", with no new drivers for the last 5-6 months I think,
you can find a 6670 DDR3 for $50, it's slower than the 4850, but for what you described I think it's a better fit, without the excessive power usage and better driver support.

the A6 uses a single module, shares a lot of stuff between the 2 cores, in some cases it would be clearly slower than the e7500.

but overall it should give you a comparable experience I think,

but again, I think your motherboard does not support the e7500 (or any 45nm CPU).

anyway, I would rather use the IGP from the 5400k than the x850xt
as a CPU it's also an upgrade compared to the e2160.
SPBHM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:56 AM   #29
Insert_Nickname
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hubb1e View Post
The fm1 and fm2 suggestions are more expensive yes, but that includes a usable video card upgrade.
^^ This

You have to look at the whole picture. The low-end AMD APU might not be that impressive on the CPU side. But they include a pretty powerful GPU core as well. It even includes the UVD3 video decoding engine, that has HW acceleration for all commonly used codecs. Far as I remember the the X850XT has no video acceleration features to speak of...

An APU setup will also use substantially less power, then a discrete GFX card. Compared to newer GFX cards, the HD4850 is quite a power-guzzler (I have owned one myself...).

my 2c...
Insert_Nickname is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 10:05 AM   #30
Hubb1e
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 357
Default

I would not bother with the dual core a6 Trinity chips on fm2. When l said a6 l was talking about llano. You will want the quad core parts on fm1 or fm2. I'm too lazy to look up names and l am on a tablet but stick to quad k models on fm1 if you get a deal or the k model quad Trinities on fm2. The a8 5600k is 100$ and unlocked. With ram board and tax you are at $200. The gpu is an upgrade. The CPU is an upgrade. and ram is an upgrade.
Hubb1e is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 01:14 PM   #31
2is
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,773
Default

And the motherboard is an upgrade
__________________
Intel i7 3770K|Intel SSD 520|Asus P8Z77-V Pro|2x GTX 680 SLI (2GB)|Corsair Force SSD|Corsair TX750|2x8GB DDR3 1600 (1.35v)

Quote:
Originally Posted by psoomah View Post
In a year Kaveri will become the processor of choice for PC gamers, in two years Intel will be a bit player in computer gaming
2is is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 01:46 PM   #32
eBauer
Senior Member
 
eBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 528
Default

Why not simply overclock the e2140? 333FSB would get you to 2.66GHz if your motherboard is capable. Definitely a lot of headroom in those chips.
__________________
Heat Youtube

Garage: 2012 Mustang Boss 302, 2008 CBR 1000RR, 2005 GSXR 1000, 1992 CBR 600 F2, 1998 Intrigue, 1994 Lumina z34.
Rigs: z77 + 3770, z77 + 2600, PII 945 + 785g
eBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.