S.E. Cupp

[Incorruptible]

Originally Posted by boomerang

It must have been very, very frustrating to be banned from P&N until right up to the days before the election. We can all see that you have a lot of pent up energy to release. Post after post as ideas enter your brain that just absolutely must be shared. Then uncontrollable urges start to take over and then we get this - the result of your little boy pee pee getting that funny feeling again. Obama won and you're just brimming with energy and you're full of life and it's just so damned difficult to control those urges.

Troll post after troll post flutter from your brain through your fingers onto the keyboard and out into the world. Your brain, which operates at the level of a young teenager thinks that you are really accomplishing something. Really sticking it to your mortal enemies, the right. While you feel this way the rest of us are shaking our heads at your juvenile behavior.

It's time you knew.

I agree 100% with what you said, as soon as he came its been useless thread after useless thread, most of them dont even serve a point. He really needs to start a blog for him to post his views non stop he could even call it the "I hate Conservatives" blog

There are 7 threads on the first page alone and I guess he has made at least 15 threads. All of them could easily be combined into one thread

[Ausm]

Originally Posted by Sephire

lol at Martin Bashir

I wouldn't laugh that guy would eviscerate any Repug who would come on his show so what's not to like?

[Ausm]

Originally Posted by techs

Banned? I haven't had a ban in years.

I was banned by a rabid Rightwing mod a few times but ,meh, I've been on these forums for 15 years.

[techs]

Originally Posted by Ausm

I was banned by a rabid Rightwing mod a few times but ,meh, I've been on these forums for 15 years.

You may have noticed two of our right wing trolls are upset that they lost the election so they are trying to censor P&N by going in as a pair into many threads and trying to hijack them by claiming the OP is a troll, regardless of the nature of the thread.

It just shows the right wing doesn't want free speech.

[Bitek]

She's been around for a while. Never been impressed. Saw her on Maher a couple years ago and she came off as a rw dingbat for the most part trying to get by on looks.

She seems to always play some cute game where she claims be center, but endorses all the rw talking points.
Eg. Talking about Muslims and Xians and religion in politics on Maher, claimed to be an atheist, but went on about how we need pro-Xian agendas in politics.

Maher just gave her the wtf are talking about treatment.

[techs]

Originally Posted by Bitek

She's been around for a while. Never been impressed. Saw her on Maher a couple years ago and she came off as a rw dingbat for the most part trying to get by on looks.

She seems to always play some cute game where she claims be center, but endorses all the rw talking points.
Eg. Talking about Muslims and Xians and religion in politics on Maher, claimed to be an atheist, but went on about how we need pro-Xian agendas in politics.

Maher just gave her the wtf are talking about treatment.

Yeah, I saw that. She is very good at spewing talking points and at not answering questions.

She was, however, unbelievably hot in her nerdy type of way. I mean smoking hot.

[Ausm]

Originally Posted by techs

You may have noticed two of our right wing trolls are upset that they lost the election so they are trying to censor P&N by going in as a pair into many threads and trying to hijack them by claiming the OP is a troll, regardless of the nature of the thread.

It just shows the right wing doesn't want free speech.

Not unless they can buy it!

[techs]

Originally Posted by techs

You may have noticed two of our right wing trolls are upset that they lost the election so they are trying to censor P&N by going in as a pair into many threads and trying to hijack them by claiming the OP is a troll, regardless of the nature of the thread.

It just shows the right wing doesn't want free speech.

Originally Posted by Ausm

Not unless they can buy it!

Well, money is speech. At least according the worst Supreme Court ever.

[Londo_Jowo]

Originally Posted by techs

Well, money is speech. At least according the worst Supreme Court ever.

Funny, I haven't seen you piss and moan about all the monies spent by the unions and PACs that support Democratic candidates/concerns. Guess that money/speech is all good amiright?????

[Ausm]

Originally Posted by Londo_Jowo

Funny, I haven't seen you piss and moan about all the monies spent by the unions and PACs that support Democratic candidates/concerns. Guess that money/speech is all good amiright?????

Why should we when it was the 1/4 of the amount of the Rightwing cash tidal wave which really didn't do shit for your side anyway.

[techs]

Originally Posted by Londo_Jowo

Funny, I haven't seen you piss and moan about all the monies spent by the unions and PACs that support Democratic candidates/concerns. Guess that money/speech is all good amiright?????

I am for the regulation of donations to political parties by all groups.

I am shocked and outraged that the American people who give money to a political candidate have to do so after their money has already been taxed while corporations can claim the money as a business expense and not pay taxes on it.

Oh, and Sheldon Adelson himself spent more money on the Presidential election than every union in America combined. Look it up.

[Londo_Jowo]

Originally Posted by Ausm

Why should we when it was the 1/4 of the amount of the Rightwing cash tidal wave which really didn't do shit for your side anyway.

So why cry if the money really doesn't make a difference.



None the less the left doesn't bitch about the Democratic supporting PACs or unions spend money on their causes. So it's nothing more than hypocrites being hypocrites.