Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > CPUs and Overclocking

· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· AMD Video Cards
· Nvidia
· Displays
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Home and Garden
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2015
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions

Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2009, 10:22 PM   #51
Gillbot's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Probably still at work
Posts: 28,785
Default Is your processor Running slower than you think it should be ? Or at a different multiplier than it should be ?

Originally posted by: spittledip
I just got a Q9550 last night and assembled my new build last night. Today I was testing for OC - lowered multiplier from 8.5 to 6 and upped the FSB to isolate and test RAM. When I finished, I put the multiplier back to 8.5 and went back into windows- CPU-Z showed my multiplier to be still at 6!!! Long story short, I worked for about an hour trying to fix the issue.. and then I remembered this thread. Turns out that CPU-Z was not reporting my multiplier right- I downloaded crystalcpuid and this showed what I had set the BIOS at. Very strange that the multiplier got stuck in CPU-Z- it was showing correctly when I first installed it. Anyway, thanks very much for this thread!!!
Give yourself a pat on the back, VERY few people read this thread.
My Heatware

Last edited by Markfw900; 03-11-2013 at 07:13 PM.
Gillbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2009, 06:39 PM   #52
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,749
Default Is your processor Running slower than you think it should be ? Or at a different multiplier than it should be ?

I'm keeping alive my own thread on the "Motherboards" forum, as I attempt to troubleshoot this Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R motherboard.

1) The board seems to be finicky about certain types of memory: I'm not the only person who's had trouble with certain flavors of OCZ RAM.

2) the board auto-configures itself to set the multiplier for the CPU lower than the Intel spec. This may have something to do with the power-management features, but I haven't seen anyone post specifics about how the auto-configuration assists with it. I noticed that the autoconfiguration sets the processor to run at 2.166 Ghz (8 x 266) (see (3) below), but MEMTEST86+ shows it as "Core 2 Duo 2.4 Ghz." When I choose the multiplier setting manually so that the system posts at 2.4 Ghz, MEMTEST86+ shows it at 2.397 Ghz. This (inconclusively) suggests to me that the motherboard is actually running the processor under MEMTEST86+ at 2.4 with the motherboard auto-configuration that posts at 2.166.

3) I'm running what is now a dated C2 an E6600 Conroe. Just off the top of my head, I see people using the motherboard with fewer problems (or none at all) who are configuring it for Wolfdale and Yorkfield processors.

Even with the replacement G.SKILL memory (to replace the OCZ modules), I've found this setup locking up after a few iterations of MEMTEST86+, even though I KNOW the modules are rock-solid good and reliable . .. . let me elaborate . . .

4) I went back into BIOS, and disabled ALL the power-management features. It doesn't seem to be locking up now, even with the CPU VCORE and RAM voltages set to the same values effective when the lockups occurred under MEMTEST86+.

Is there a difference in the power-management features of Conroe and Penryn-type cores?

Is it at all likely that -- even if the mobo-maker says the board will run {Pentium D, C2D, C2Q . . } LGA775 cores -- that the BIOS shipped with it may be intended more for Penryn-type cores?

Intel i7-2600K with HT @ 4.6 Ghz; P8Z68-V-Pro Z68 motherboard 16GB G.SKILL DDR3-1866 RAM; GTX 780; 840-Pro and MX100 512GB, 1TB HDD
i7-2700K @ 4.7 Ghz; _____-V-Pro/Gen3 Z68 20GB G.SKILL DDR3-1866 RAM; 2x 970 GTX; ADATA SP550 480GB, 1TB HDD cached to Blaze 60GB SSD
CM HAF 932 cases; Seasonic 750W and 650W PSUs
BonzaiDuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2009, 11:35 PM   #53
Diamond Member
DominionSeraph's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Equestria
Posts: 8,275
Default Is your processor Running slower than you think it should be ? Or at a different multiplier than it should be ?

Originally posted by: foolio65
I hadn't used this machine in a week or so, and when I turned it on yesterday it was incredible slow.
Like insanely stuttering slow, or seemingly normal for an 800MHz processor? (At 800MHz, Win98 should still be super-fast [I have a PIII 700 that boots in 10 seconds] and XP should run ok.)

If it's crazy slow, it could be thermal throttling. My Inspiron 8000 has a loose heatsink, and even though it reports its full 900MHz (no speedstep on P3s), once that fan turns to emergency-high, it dogs waaay down until reboot.

If that's not it, you might have to try clearing CMOS and reinstalling your OS.

And why on Earth would you use Always On?

Danse De Raven

"P&N: Not Quite as Bad as Stormfront"
DominionSeraph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 10:31 PM   #54
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9
Default Is your processor Running slower than you think it should be ? Or at a different multiplier than it should be ?

BonzaiDuck, send you a PM
shobuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 05:00 AM   #55
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4

this one is really good and I like it very much .
Aqeel1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2009, 04:57 PM   #56
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1

Hi guys/girls. First post on the forum "Woohoo"! Fortunately i managed to resolve my issue before having to ask a question. I can confirm that my i7 920 does not like cpuz. I OC'd the 920 to 3.7GHz and just scared myself when i checked cpuz and found that the multiplier was not dropping from 20! It was hovering within 10MHz of 3.7GHz and chewing more than it's fair share of power. Fortunately coretemp has shown the true multiplier which drops back down to 12 when it's not being spanked. cpuz 1.5 does not work with i7.

Out of interest does anyone have any info on setting up i7's as i am a first time overclocker and i'm probably a bit far off the mark as my temp is getting right up when i'm at 3.7GHz. I'd like to keep the temp down but don't like the idea of water cooling and know that my bios setting can be refined.
Thuggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 02:44 PM   #57
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 54

Ok, this is good to be known, i have this problem with my processor and i thought the solution is to reset it. Your advices are very useful, but i'm also curios..if you have reset your computer and all...do you still need the action in BIOS if the processor is slow? or it may be another problem?
johnny.dacu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 02:35 AM   #58
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 546
Default CPU-Z (v.1.55) vs CrystalCPUID(v.

I forgot about this stickied thread, and posed this question as part of another post. Maybe it's more appropriate to ask in the context of this thread:

My i5-760 consistently shows a 22x multiplier in CPUID's CPU-Z. Whether overclocking, or with stock settings (everything set at "Auto"), I don't see a 21x multiplier which the specifications for this chip (21 x 133Mhz = 2.793Ghz ~ advertised 2.8Ghz) indicate. Is CPU-Z in error?

FYI, at light load, the chip powers down to a 9x multiplier (and core temps drop) for a result of 1.2Ghz. Just curious: is 9x the proper multiplier for that situation?

Originally Posted by spittledip View Post
Turns out that CPU-Z was not reporting my multiplier right- I downloaded crystalcpuid and this showed what I had set the BIOS at. Very strange that the multiplier got stuck in CPU-Z- it was showing correctly when I first installed it.
Based on that idea, I downloaded CrystalCPUID to verify it against CPU-Z. Are you sure CrystalCPUID is not just reflecting the BIOS settings? On my system it sits there showing 2798.05 Mhz as the current clock regardless if the CPU steps down to 9x at idle, or if TurboBoost kicks in (as verified by Intel's own TurboBoost Monitor). I do keep pressing <F5> and CrystalCPUID keeps reporting 2798.05 when all other indications are that that is *not* the current speed.
i3-3225, 3.3GHz w/stock HSF, GigaByte H77M-D3H | 4x4GB Kingston RAM = 16GB
Gigabyte Radeon R7 360 2GB GDDR5 | Samsung 840 EVO 250GB & Intel 730 240 GB | 2TB WD Green
Silverstone Temjin TJ-08E | CoolerMaster eXtreme Power Plus 460W | Win 10 Pro 64-bit
Dell U2312HM 23" & Dell P2415Q 24" LCDs
(Also have Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro & Microsoft Surface 3)
Location: Thailand (several hours south of Bangkok)
wpcoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2011, 08:48 PM   #59
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 5

Ya, when I first started overclocking, I took notice of this all important fact about the auto down-clocking to conserve power and reduce heat. I fist saw it using CPU-Z.
SillyBit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 04:25 AM   #60
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3

w1llm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 12:35 AM   #61
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2

lol .
speedy504 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:47 PM   #62
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AZ
Posts: 12,089

I seem to be having issues where my CPU will downclock when I run something like Prime.
I would like the CPU to downclock when idle but not when full load or gaming.

In the BIOS I have the multi set to 44. I have all the power saving features enabled currently. I have my voltage off set at -.55 which should be about 1.33 This is what CPU-Z and Asrock's tuner display. Core Temp shows the VID at 1.375-1.38.

At any rate with this set up, to start my CPU runs at the correct speed of 4.4Ghz. Eventually as the heat creeps up to about 61C on inplace FFT's. It will drop the multi to 42 or 43 once it hits 62C and the temp will top off at 63C.

Is there any thing I can do to keep power savings on but still receive my full OC?
Intel i7 4790K @ 4.4GHz | 256GB Samsung 850 Pro SSD | 1 TB Crucial M500 | 120 GB OCZ Solid 2 SSD | GA-Z97MX-Gaming 5 | Asus R9 290 DCUII @ stock | 2 x 8GB GSkill RipJaw DDR3 @ 1833| Cool Master 750
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz | 256GB Sandisk Ultra Plus SSD | AsRock Z68 Extreme 3 Gen 3| Sapphire 7850 | 2x Seagate 1.5 TB HDD's in RAID1 | CoolMaster 550 watt |2 x 4GB GSkill RipSaw DDR3 1600
My journey from Beast to BEAST!
JBT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 10:59 AM   #63
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 11

muk1604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 08:23 PM   #64
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18

I don't know much about this aspect. I got more from our website.

Thank you!
nxttruong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 08:50 PM   #65
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1

This thread needs to suggest a way to actually verify multiplier when EIST and C1E are enabled. I'm greedy and would like to have an overclock and power saving, but I just can't tell if it's working for me or if enabling these options is permanently locking me to 6x. I've tried running cpuz while stress testing and it still show 6x.

Are there any more reliable tools for testing? I suspect either a software bug or my motherboard.
alexanderbwinni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 10:48 PM   #66
Senior Member
crazymonkeyzero's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 363

Wanted to share something I just found out, which may be worth adding to the sticky, in case less experienced member (like myself) did not know.

I just picked up a 3930k on BF and made my 2011 workstation yesterday, and to my surprise it was just plain slow in running computations for my work. The i7 3770k computer I had was ripping through tasks, finishing jobs in 20mins, while the 3930k was taking 32mins for the exact same job (note, all chips are at stock). Upon installing core temp and cpuz, I noticed that voltage on the my 3930k was 0.8 volts at times, and the chip was down clocking to 1.2ghz during the job. Temperature throttling was not the issue, because I have the h100 and temps were always below 50c. After messing with the bios, to no avail, I was just about to give up, when I saw the option in the control panel in windows 7 for power options and noticed that it defaulted to "power saving" After changing this to "high performance" I noticed a 2x increase in speed of the chip. Now the same exact job finishes in 16mins and the 3930k runs 3.5-3.8ghz all the time.

Very happy now Was just about to return the 3930k lol.
crazymonkeyzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 02:53 PM   #67
John Tauwhare
John Tauwhare's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Cambridge, England
Posts: 124

I have a Lenovo U260 laptop with a Core i5-470UM Nehalem CPU clocked at 1333 with turbo boost to 1867. I ran an Excel benchmark test on it expecting a time comparable to a 2GHz Penryn Core Duo of c.100 seconds. But it averaged 172 seconds and ranged widely from 159 to 184. I figured the turbo boost wasn't triggering, or only randomly, and moved on to other things. A couple of weeks later I had time to investigate, and used Argus Monitor to track the CPU clock speed as it ran the benchmark. It wasn't running with a 1333 floor; it was actually spending alot of its time at 667.

THEN, I finally got to reading this thread. And realised my mistake.

So, I selected the High Performance power plan, and went into advanced setting to make sure the processor state would give 100%. Then I reran the benchmark. Argus showed the clock pressed on the 1867 limit the entire run and the time came down to 87 seconds. Which seems quite impressive for an 18 watt part, and has changed my opinion of ultra low voltage CPUs.

i7-2700K @5.0/1.38V, ASRock Z77 OC Formula, Xigmatek Aegir with 2xReeven Coldwing, 8Gb G.Skill ARES@1866, Zotac AMP! GTX770 SLI, 128Gb OCZ Vertex4, 2xToshiba 500Gb, beQuiet! Dark Power 850W psu, Dell XPS710 case, Dell U3011, Win7-64
i5-4670K, ASUS Z87I-PRO, Zalman LQ315 with Thermalright 140mm, 8Gb G.Skill ARES@1866, Zotac AMP! GTX760, 128Gb OCZ Vector150, Hitachi 500Gb, Silverstone SG05 case + 450W psu, Win7-64
John Tauwhare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2013, 12:32 AM   #68
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3

Originally Posted by Markfw900 View Post
Well, the way I read the Intel documents, C1E is this:
"C1 - Auto Halt: core clock is off. C1 is a state where the processor is not executing instructions, but can return to an executing state essentially instantaneously. Some processors also support an Enhanced C1 state (C1E) for lower power consumption."

While EIST is enhanced speedstep, changing the multi to 6 instead of 9 (as an example) and lowering voltage. I didn't see anything about cache.
Hey its appreciative answer and grabing few points here too....
NathanBrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2015, 09:58 PM   #69
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 149

I think I may have an issue with my 4790k. I just read Anand's article on the 4790k and ran the Cinebench 15 benchmark on my CPU but got a lower score. This is on a fresh install of Win7 with all updated drivers and nothing else running in the background. You can see my score is 846 vs 894 for Anand. What would cause this difference? I'm comparing the scores that are a stock speed obviously not the overclocked score.

Xenphor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2015, 01:15 PM   #70
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: US
Posts: 8

I am using an FX 8320 with a Gigabyte 970-DS3P. Is there any tweak like this so as to get a little boost in the performance? Multi-core performance for the FX series is great btw.....
best_2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2015, 07:37 PM   #71
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 154

the more i read, the more i get confused
lazybedone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2015, 08:01 AM   #72
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1

Site is just amazing
Marlena13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2015, 07:32 AM   #73
Junior Member
computershop's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3

good thread idea
computershop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 05:01 AM   #74
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Netherlands, Apeldoorn
Posts: 1

kinda new to OC and was looking around after fiddling myself, so far this is the best and easiest forum yet so i decided to register.
At least this noob is smart enough to read the sticky's

Any way the info here i sadly already gathered pulling info 2gether from diff forums.
Like the idea c1e and eist but i still have core clock issues.

when i disabled them both in bios and run cpu-z it shows a max of 2.006 mhz when stressed with prime
when i lock my multiplier to 7.5 instead of auto it makes no diff.
FSB stays at 266mhz wich should have been higher.

i have a Q8300 on a p5b-vm-se board ( none stock cooler but coolmaster hyper 212 evo)), 6gb of pc6400 ram, geforce gtx680 and a 120GB samsung evo 840 SSD.

if i oc with the standard profiles i counts it with the 2000mhz so instead of getting for example 2700mhz i get 2200mhz.

Core temp is around 40 iddling and around 54-58 when stressed 100% for about 60min

if any1 knows the mobo i would love to know why it doesnt go passed 2.0ghz without OC
LatestNoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2015, 10:59 AM   #75
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 4

My specs are currently:
Q6600 (should be at 2.7 Ghz 300mhz x 6-9 ideally)
Abit IB9
BFG 8800 512 Mb GTS
2 Gb Geil Value DDR 2 8000 5-5-5-15
X-Fi Extreme Gamer
Windows Vista 64 bit
lody2mk is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Alpha 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.