Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Consumer Electronics > Digital and Video Cameras

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-27-2013, 09:28 PM   #1
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default Canon Telephoto Lens for Dance Recital Video

I'm planning on recording on a Canon T2i a dance recital (so lots of movement and low light). What kind of lens should I be using? I think I'm going to be able 60 ft away from the stage. I used a EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM last year, but I was wondering if there was a better lens that I could use (I'd probably rent it somewhere).
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 09:43 PM   #2
iGas
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,181
Default

80mm f1.2, 50mm f1.4, or 135 f2
iGas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 04:51 PM   #3
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iGas View Post
80mm f1.2, 50mm f1.4, or 135 f2
What are the pros/cons between the different ones? Which would you choose?
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 05:39 PM   #4
randomrogue
Diamond Member
 
randomrogue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAoTiCpInOy View Post
What are the pros/cons between the different ones? Which would you choose?
He's picking low aperture primes for low light video. The one you'll want will depend on where you're sitting and what kind of frame you want to capture.
randomrogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 06:22 PM   #5
SecurityTheatre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 672
Default

We don't know the venue or what you're looking at capturing. Was a 70mm lens not long enough?

You might want to get a longer lens. Probably the most important thing is using a tripod, though. There is NOTHING worse than shaky-cam, and unless you're an experienced videographer with a stabilized lens, you will shake.

Get a tripod and then get any lens that's long enough to reach the stage. Shutter speed is less important for video, but still, for quality, you want a lens that's decently fast.

I don't necessarily agree with the options like an 80 f/1.2. The depth of field may be too shallow for your use. You will be more likely happy shooting at f/2.8, I suggest a 70-200 f/2.8 lens and a tripod. If you can't get a tripod, be absolutely certain you have an IS lens - the stabilization will make the shots suck less (though handheld is still very very difficult with a long lens).

Good luck
SecurityTheatre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 07:03 PM   #6
iGas
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAoTiCpInOy View Post
What are the pros/cons between the different ones? Which would you choose?
Fast lens for low light, and focal length depends on the type of shooting you will be doing. f1.2 or f1.4 isn't bad if the subject is 2/3-3/4 of the frame. And will not pose as a problem if you take in the entire stage.

IMHO, it is best to have at least 2 cameras, 1 for the entire stage, and 1 for single out the subject.

Fast lens requires much prep work, and is more difficult for focus. You can do so by marking the stage with tape and put marking indication/tape for distance on your lens before the recital so that you can keep the subject in focus. Manual focus will be better than auto focus and can be done so with a focus puller or a homemade focus puller (jar opener and a piece of card).

http://www.theblackandblue.com/2010/...cus-solutions/

Tripod or monopod is a must, but an IS lens can do the task in a pinch.

Add:
Crop body,
80mm f1.2 DOF at 60' is 7.75', f1.4 DOF at 60' is 9.23'
50mm f1.4 DOF at 60' is 24.5'
135mm f2 DOF at 60' is 4.55'
80mm f2.8 DOF at 60' is 18.8', 200mm f2.8 DOF at 60' is 2.92'

Last edited by iGas; 01-28-2013 at 07:22 PM.
iGas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 10:23 AM   #7
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

I have a tripod that I'm going to use.

I guess I forgot to mention that I was going to be using it to get the whole stage. The 24-70mm was all right, but I was wondering if there was a lens that would give me a better image.
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 10:25 AM   #8
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iGas View Post
IMHO, it is best to have at least 2 cameras, 1 for the entire stage, and 1 for single out the subject.
I have a Canon XA10 but I wasn't sure if i would get a better image for the whole stage with that over the T2i with a lens that you guys recommend.
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 01:00 PM   #9
slashbinslashbash
Golden Member
 
slashbinslashbash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAoTiCpInOy View Post
I have a tripod that I'm going to use.

I guess I forgot to mention that I was going to be using it to get the whole stage. The 24-70mm was all right, but I was wondering if there was a lens that would give me a better image.
Whole stage? Meaning you're going to set it on the tripod, start it recording, and leave it running the whole time without zooming in/out?

My first suggestion would be the Sigma 30mm f/1.4. It would let in 4x as much light as the 24-70/2.8, but the focal length has to be right. Basically, figure out which focal length is needed (do you remember from last year with the 24-70? Were you zoomed all the way in, or all the way out, or somewhere in the middle?) and then find the biggest aperture (lowest number) that you can at that focal length. 30mm/1.4, 50mm/1.4, 85mm/1.8 are all reasonably cheap (<$500) and fast.
__________________
MacBook Pro|2.2GHz Quad-Core i7|Radeon 6750 1GB|16GB|750GB|Parallels|Win7HP
Mac Pro|2xXeon 5150|12GB|128GB 840 + 2x1.5TB|Radeon 5770|Dell 2407WFP+2007FP
ASUS P5B|E6550|2GB|1.5TB|Radeon 280X|Win7HP
Canon 5D|40D|17-40L|24-105L|70-200L|50/1.4|85/1.8|100/2.8 Macro|580EX|430EX|AlienBees

The Left is not merely gauche; it is downright sinister.
slashbinslashbash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 02:06 PM   #10
SecurityTheatre
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 672
Default

If you have a 24-70 f/2.8 lens, you have one of the best zoom lenses available, bar-none, provided it is the correct focal length.

The biggest problem with this type of video is usually the perspective (placement of the camera). Shooting it from the middle of the room, with a wide angle lens makes everything tiny, flat and generally really poor looking.

Most professional shoots, when they want to get the whole stage, will position the camera very high in the back of the room and in the center, or possibly slightly to one side. Is there a balcony, or a ledge you can put it on? That will look much nicer. The further back you can get (and use a correspondingly longer lens), the better because the longer lens compresses the image and makes those distant dancers seem closer together and is a more natural perspective for viewing things on stage.

But if you don't have these options, then, in the end, you won't find a much better lens than the 24-70 for what it sounds like you're describing, unless I've misunderstood your needs. Seriously, a faster lens like the f/1.8 options would let in more light, but I don't think it would change the video quality much, if at all.

If you had a problem with the quality last year, what was it?

Video is low resolution, so unless you're saying that it was too dark, I don't think any change is warranted.

Was it blurry last year? Was it too dark? Or was everyone on the image just a tiny dot because it was set to record the whole stage from within the audience with a wide angle lens? heh

Last edited by SecurityTheatre; 01-29-2013 at 02:09 PM.
SecurityTheatre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 03:03 PM   #11
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SecurityTheatre View Post
If you had a problem with the quality last year, what was it?

Video is low resolution, so unless you're saying that it was too dark, I don't think any change is warranted.

Was it blurry last year? Was it too dark? Or was everyone on the image just a tiny dot because it was set to record the whole stage from within the audience with a wide angle lens? heh
The main problem was last year everyone's face was overexposed. It was hard to see their faces because it was really bright. I don't know if a lens will fix that though.

Would a Canon XA10 be any better than my T2i with a 24-70mm or better lens?
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 03:55 PM   #12
AkumaX
Lifer
 
AkumaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAoTiCpInOy View Post
The main problem was last year everyone's face was overexposed. It was hard to see their faces because it was really bright. I don't know if a lens will fix that though.

Would a Canon XA10 be any better than my T2i with a 24-70mm or better lens?
A new lens wouldn't fix that.

If the 24-70 worked fine (as in, it was wide enough @ 24, and it was long enough @ 70), then you should stick with it.

What you should try beforehand is changing the exposure setting. Not necessarily moving it into Manual Mode, but you can tweak the EV value on the EV exposure bar to -1 and experiment with that!
__________________
............................
HeetWear
(o_
(o_ (o_ / /
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
AkumaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 07:16 PM   #13
ChAoTiCpInOy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Is a Canon XA10 a better sensor/zoom lens than the T2i?
ChAoTiCpInOy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 08:18 PM   #14
iGas
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChAoTiCpInOy View Post
Is a Canon XA10 a better sensor/zoom lens than the T2i?
I do not think that one is much better than the other in the sensor department, however the XA10 zoom mechanism will be better and more quiet than T2i for video, as well as sounds.

I would shoot with both cameras the T2i for wide angle shot, and the XA10 for close up because it have better zoom.

Last edited by iGas; 02-22-2013 at 09:02 PM.
iGas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.