Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > General Hardware

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2013, 03:36 AM   #51
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

The i5 isnt going to happen anytime soon - it is way over my starting budget. Listen to me here... I am currently running a Pentium D 925 which as you know is the definition of ancient, it will go under full load just from loading up chrome. I think that might be the reason I am looking for more threads than I actually need... Could it be that my low end computer history is telling me to get more threads instead of single thread performance? But on the other hand i wanted to try some overclocking as i have been missing out on all the fun... Is it true the i3 will OC to about 200-300MHz more than stock? Am i being really stupid for not getting an i3 instead?
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 04:08 AM   #52
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

The i3 will not OC, at all. It is locked to its 3.3Ghz setting. On your budget I think it's a decent choice, it'll be a huge improvement and a good match for a midrange GPU.

Can you list all the parts you're currently considering?
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 04:14 AM   #53
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

CPU - i3 3225
Mobo - $90 mobo
RAM - 8gb 1600 DDR3
PSU - XFX Pro Series Core Edition P1-550S
Case - CiT Jupiter Gaming Case
GFX - MSI R7770 OC Edition
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 04:50 AM   #54
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

No need for the i3-3225, you'll do just as well with the i3-3220. The integrated GPU is the only difference and it simply doesn't matter when you have a discrete GPU.

The PSU is pretty overpowered for this rig but it does carry 5 year warranty and has enough power for a overclocked i5 + high end GPU rig, should you decide to buy something like that in the future.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:03 AM   #55
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

Yes sorry kinda typing error i guess, well i just saw this guy with a 2120 go upto 3.55 ish with a bclk adjustment. Can i ask what are the cons of upping the bclk and what can get damaged etc
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:24 AM   #56
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

First off, BCLK overclocking doesn't work with non-overclocker chipsets like B75 or H77. Only Z77.

The performance increase possible is rather minimal since you can only increase BCLK from 100 to 104 or so before you risk running into problems. In addition to CPU frequency, BCLK affects SATA, USB, PCIe and perhaps others, not sure. In short it's not worth it.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:30 AM   #57
Sleepingforest
Platinum Member
 
Sleepingforest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedroc1999 View Post
The i5 isnt going to happen anytime soon - it is way over my starting budget. Listen to me here... I am currently running a Pentium D 925 which as you know is the definition of ancient, it will go under full load just from loading up chrome. I think that might be the reason I am looking for more threads than I actually need... Could it be that my low end computer history is telling me to get more threads instead of single thread performance? But on the other hand i wanted to try some overclocking as i have been missing out on all the fun... Is it true the i3 will OC to about 200-300MHz more than stock? Am i being really stupid for not getting an i3 instead?
I think you fundamentally don't understand a key point about computers: higher clockspeed, more GHz, and more cores does not always mean more power. For example, take this comparison between the Pentium 4 660 (3.6 GHz) against the Pentium G850 (at 2.9 GHz). If you look at the Anandtech Bench, you see that the lower clocked but more modern Pentium G850 is superior on every way by 2 or 3 times.

How could this be? Well, computer chips are improving in more ways than one. In the world right now, the biggest thing improvement in CPU power is found in "instructions per clock" (or IPC, for short). Modern CPUs can execute many more instructions per clock (GHz) than old ones.

Similarly, core count cannot guarantee more power. Most programs can only take advantage of one core, maybe two. The other cores basically sit there and uselessly idle. This is why Intel is generally a better choice for CPU needs: they provide far more IPC than AMD. An i5-2700k clocked at 3.5 GHz will beat an FX-6300 at 3.5 GHz.

Buying more intelligently will yield more power for you than going on a wild goose chase after core count or overclocks.
Sleepingforest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 09:35 AM   #58
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

Yes, I know... This is not my first hardware forum, I got unfairly banned from SevenForums, I had earned the Supporter and Power User badge. But yes all you have said is right
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 12:21 PM   #59
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

What about a used 3570k, what kind of stuff is on eBay?
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:29 PM   #60
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

Sure, if you can find a used Ivy Bridge i5 for only a little more than an i3, it's worth it. To take full advantage of the K version you would need a Z77 motherboard, however.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:31 PM   #61
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

They are going at 60 + postage on eBay riht now
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:41 PM   #62
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

The winning bid will be much higher. You can estimate the typical winning bid by searching for completed listings: the 3570K seems to go for about 140-150.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:46 PM   #63
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

Yes I know, lets not go into ebay tactics and/or ebay techmiques shall we...
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:50 PM   #64
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,901
Default

I was just helping you out, it seemed you thought you could actually get a 3570K for 60 + postage.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 01:53 PM   #65
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

Yes i didnt really make myself clear enough. Thx
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 05:52 PM   #66
Sleepingforest
Platinum Member
 
Sleepingforest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,353
Default

If it's on Ebay, I would go with the non-K i5s simply because who knows what kind of torturous overclocking it's been through if it's on ebay.
Sleepingforest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 08:49 PM   #67
mfenn
Elite Member
Moderator
General Hardware
 
mfenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 20,755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleepingforest View Post
If it's on Ebay, I would go with the non-K i5s simply because who knows what kind of torturous overclocking it's been through if it's on ebay.
Agree. Plenty of people knowingly dump CPUs that have had huge voltages fed through them on Ebay. Even more sell CPUs that they've unknowingly fed too much voltage due to auto-overclocking software.
mfenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 03:31 AM   #68
Torn Mind
Platinum Member
 
Torn Mind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,311
Default

GTA IV apparently does like 3 cores, but any more does not have much effect. However, it is not worth buying aftermarket cooling just to overclock it. The FX-6300 is 95.99 pounds at overclockers.co.uk and aftermarket cooling is about 25 pounds for the Hyper 212 EVO. That's about 177 pounds for the CPU, mobo, and cooling. Extra fans will add further cost.

The MSI B75A-G43 and Intel Core i5-3470 can be had together for about 201 total with no need for extra cooling. A 24 pound difference.
__________________
SR061| Asrock H77M | 2x2GB G.Skill 1333Mhz NS RAM | PowerSpec TX-606 Case| 500GB 7200RPM Seagate Drive| Antec Eartwatts EA-500 (2006) | Asus DVD Burner | parallell and COM port header | Old Dell Keyboard
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=93090
Torn Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 03:54 AM   #69
Torn Mind
Platinum Member
 
Torn Mind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedroc1999 View Post
The i5 isnt going to happen anytime soon - it is way over my starting budget. Listen to me here... I am currently running a Pentium D 925 which as you know is the definition of ancient, it will go under full load just from loading up chrome. I think that might be the reason I am looking for more threads than I actually need... Could it be that my low end computer history is telling me to get more threads instead of single thread performance? But on the other hand i wanted to try some overclocking as i have been missing out on all the fun... Is it true the i3 will OC to about 200-300MHz more than stock? Am i being really stupid for not getting an i3 instead?
In the simplest terms, a processor's performance is based on how fast it executes code.
For one single core, the speed at executing code is measured in IPS(instructions per second), which is the product of clockspeed and instructions per cycle(IPC). In equation form, IPS=IPC*clockspeed. Clockspeed is arbitrarily set and varies little. A whole host of factors affects the instructions per cycle, both hardware and software affect IPC.

When another core are added to a processor, the total IPS of the whole processor is no longer the equation above. Now, I'm not sure about the precise details, so the following explanation is not 100% accurate. IPS(total)= one single core IPS + proportion of the second core*(one single core IPS)

However, utilizing multiple cores is dependent on the developer specifically writing code that takes advantage of multiple cores. If the programmer does not do so, the 2nd core contributes almost nothing* for the application itself. Now, if a program does take advantage of more than one thread, that does not necessarily mean that it will scale perfectly and take full advantage of the other core. It might, like with video encoding, but other programs will might only partially take advantage of extra cores.

Obviously, adding another core can increase IPS for the whole processor, but the total IPS can be improved by increasing the IPS of each single core. Clockspeed is one component on a single core's IPS.

So, when overclocking a CPU, what you are doing is increasing the IPS of each single core on the processor. http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...d_fx8350/7.htm
The overclock in that link had the FX-8350 overclocked to a crazy 5.2 Ghz with water cooling. At that clockspeed, its overclocked FX-8350's Cinebench Single Core result is similar to a 3960X at stock.

Increasing IPC can improve IPS of a single core. Hence, even a Sandy Bridge Celeron G530 outright crushes a CPU like your Pentium D, even if one core on the Celeron is disabled.

Interestingly, as I look at Anand's Bench results between the i3-3220 and FX-6300, the benchmarks like Cinebench clearly show the i3 has superior single core performance. However, lightly threaded benchmarks like the Windows Media 9 encoder or the x264 1st pass benchmark, the gap is barely existent. This might be Turbo Core, CPU cache size, platform differences, and/or something else.


* almost nothing because a single core can be "stalled" at times. This is why my computing experience on a Prescott Pentium 4 is smoother when I enable HyperThreading on it. This is because sometimes multiple separate programs are waiting for threads to be executed and the OS task scheduler can distribute threads from different apps to different threads/cores. If there were only one program not coded for multiple cores running, the the 2nd core contributes totally nothing.
__________________
SR061| Asrock H77M | 2x2GB G.Skill 1333Mhz NS RAM | PowerSpec TX-606 Case| 500GB 7200RPM Seagate Drive| Antec Eartwatts EA-500 (2006) | Asus DVD Burner | parallell and COM port header | Old Dell Keyboard
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=93090
Torn Mind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 04:52 AM   #70
Pedroc1999
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Merthyr Tydfil, Wales
Posts: 305
Default

Thanks Torn, that is a very good explanation!
Pedroc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.