|
|
 |
01-16-2013, 12:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
|
Tegra 3 desktop equivalent
Hey guys.
I've been trying to find information on an equvalent desktop GPU for the tegra 3. In terms of gflops, support for directx 9 and any other APIs, whats the closes match for a tegra T30-T33?
I recently been trying to answer this question, but I cannot find the articles/threads that have this info, I just remember it was in an anandtech discusions.
Thanks again for any help.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 12:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 54
|
8100GT 2mb of gddr.001
Impossible to compare as benchmarks are largely based on SW code, which is different from ARM (T3) to x86.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 01:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 7,987
|
Probably slower than a Geforce 3
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 01:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
|
okay, I see what you mean. i was just interested in the processing power it had. There have been games ported, example some PS3 games with lower details and run less FPS, THDs like Hamilton and zombie driver.
Vendetta Online requires a Fully DirectX compatible 32MB video card, which translates to a very weak video card. But wanted to know how far down the generations of Geforce cards do I need to go to find the best match.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 01:42 PM
|
#5
|
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minsk, Belarus or Utah, USA
Posts: 2,981
|
Geforce MX would be my first guess.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 01:54 PM
|
#6
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,955
|
..
Last edited by BenSkywalker; 01-22-2013 at 08:35 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 02:30 PM
|
#7
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 10,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenSkywalker
Tegra 3 has 1GB *on die* memory  It's an SoC and they work quite a bit different then PCs.
|
Memory... or cache?
Quote:
|
Futuremark will have their new bench out soon and we will be able to compare them directly(obviously different code base, but then we can see actual performance numbers).
|
Hmm, interesting.
__________________
Wrote a note said Be Back in a Minute
Bought a boat and I sailed off in it
Don't think anybody's gonna miss me anyway
Heat
ForSale
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 05:54 PM
|
#8
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
|
This is great info, Thank you all for all the help.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 08:13 PM
|
#9
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,370
|
Tegra 3 is roughly the same as the Xbox (the first one)'s gpu, which was a low end geforce 4.
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 09:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,892
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox5
Tegra 3 is roughly the same as the Xbox (the first one)'s gpu, which was a low end geforce 4.
|
which is quite amazing...
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 09:27 PM
|
#11
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,342
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirednuts
which is quite amazing...
|
Is it? I guess so, but then again the Xbox came out well over a decade ago. That's an eternity in computing terms. Back then is when I bought my iBook 600.
BTW, my Trident 8900C still works.
__________________
OS X & iOS: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD | iPad 2
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: RAZR HD | Nexus 7
|
|
|
01-16-2013, 09:35 PM
|
#12
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,342
|
BTW, what's even more important to me is Tegra 3's ability to decode 1080p30 High Profile H.264 in real time. Try doing that on the Xbox's CPU or GPU.
__________________
OS X & iOS: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD | iPad 2
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: RAZR HD | Nexus 7
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 03:38 AM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenSkywalker
Tegra 3 has 1GB *on die* memory  It's an SoC and they work quite a bit different then PCs.
|
1GB of on die memory?
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 03:40 AM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eug
BTW, what's even more important to me is Tegra 3's ability to decode 1080p30 High Profile H.264 in real time. Try doing that on the Xbox's CPU or GPU.
|
Fairly trivial these days. Dedicated hardware video decoders are amazingly efficient.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 05:46 AM
|
#15
|
|
Super Moderator Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 26,628
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgandy
1GB of on die memory?
|
It's not on die, it's on package ( Package on Package). On die would imply a single monolithic die, which is not the case. Plus eDRAM isn't dense enough to pull that off anyhow.
__________________
ViRGE
Team Anandtech: Assimilating a computer near you!
GameStop - An upscale specialized pawnshop that happens to sell new games on the side
Todd the Wraith: On Fruit Bowls - I hope they prove [to be] as delicious as the farmers who grew them
Last edited by ViRGE; 01-17-2013 at 05:48 AM.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 05:55 AM
|
#16
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,955
|
..
Last edited by BenSkywalker; 01-22-2013 at 08:36 PM.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 07:38 AM
|
#17
|
|
Super Moderator Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 26,628
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenSkywalker
You sure? I thought T3 dumped PoP?
Just double checked, T3 is still PoP.
|
I'm not aware of any mainstream SoCs using on-die memory at this point. They aren't even using TSVs yet.
__________________
ViRGE
Team Anandtech: Assimilating a computer near you!
GameStop - An upscale specialized pawnshop that happens to sell new games on the side
Todd the Wraith: On Fruit Bowls - I hope they prove [to be] as delicious as the farmers who grew them
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 09:36 AM
|
#18
|
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenSkywalker
Futuremark will have their new bench out soon and we will be able to compare them directly(obviously different code base, but then we can see actual performance numbers).
|
I'm really looking forward to that. To say that the popular mobile benchmarks are lacking is a massive understatement.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 10:24 AM
|
#19
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,342
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgandy
Fairly trivial these days. Dedicated hardware video decoders are amazingly efficient.
|
Well, that's my point. Trivial now, but a huge problem back in the days of the Xbox, on the consumer side.
__________________
OS X & iOS: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD | iPad 2
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: RAZR HD | Nexus 7
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 10:38 AM
|
#20
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eug
Well, that's my point. Trivial now, but a huge problem back in the days of the Xbox, on the consumer side.
|
Did Xbox have a dedicated MPEG2 decoder? It would never have had H.264 decoder because it only had a DVD player.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViRGE
It's not on die, it's on package ( Package on Package). On die would imply a single monolithic die, which is not the case. Plus eDRAM isn't dense enough to pull that off anyhow.
|
Yeah I know, just checking he knew the difference between package and die as there is a HUGE difference.
|
|
|
01-17-2013, 10:40 AM
|
#21
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,396
|
1GB of memory on-die would be rather astounding.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.
|