Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2013, 07:49 AM   #1
dmcowen674
No Lifer
 
dmcowen674's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 54,066
Default Is Income Inequality as American as Apple Pie?

1-8-2013

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/income...095404318.html

Is Income Inequality as American as Apple Pie?

By Holly Ellyatt | CNBC

Income inequality has been on the rise for three decades in the United States, according to the Congressional Budget Office, with the gap between the "haves" and "have-nots" currently at its widest point since 1967.

The Congressional Budget Office reported in 2011 that between 1979 and 2007 the top 1 percent of households saw their income grow by 275 percent, while for the bottom 20 percent, income grew by just 20 percent. For the middle 60 percent of Americans, average incomes grew just under 40 percent.
dmcowen674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 07:49 AM   #2
dmcowen674
No Lifer
 
dmcowen674's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 54,066
Default

Go right on believing that Holly
dmcowen674 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:04 AM   #3
TerryMathews
Lifer
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmcowen674 View Post
Go right on believing that Holly
Isn't the first sign of being crazy talking to yourself?
__________________
Asrock Z87 Extreme4 | 4770K @ 4.6GHz (46x100 at 1.096V + 0.139V adaptive) | Noctua NH-D14 | 16GB RAM |2x MSI GTX 770 OC Dual Fan | Fractal Design Define R4 | QNIX QX2710 @ 2560x1440 96Hz
My Heatware evals
TerryMathews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:05 AM   #4
Matt1970
Lifer
 
Matt1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 11,176
Default

It's actually 4 decades, but then that flies in the face of everyone who likes to blame it on Reagan.
Matt1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:44 AM   #5
diesbudt
Diamond Member
 
diesbudt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryMathews View Post
Isn't the first sign of being crazy talking to yourself?
No talking to oneself is natural.

Having a conversation with oneself is the first signs of lunacy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuel View Post
If there was a train of logic, yours derailed about 7 stations back and you just hopped onto the tracks and started running down them in place of the train.
diesbudt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:47 AM   #6
Texashiker
Lifer
 
Texashiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SouthEast Texas
Posts: 17,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmcowen674 View Post
The Congressional Budget Office reported in 2011 that between 1979 and 2007 the top 1 percent of households saw their income grow by 275 percent, while for the bottom 20 percent, income grew by just 20 percent. For the middle 60 percent of Americans, average incomes grew just under 40 percent.
Wages have been stagnated for 20 - 25 years. In a lot of fields wages have lost ground during that time.

Instead of using percentages of growth, which can be eroded by inflation, use minimum wage as a base line.

Between 1987 - 1991 I worked for a company whos top pay was 3.23 times minimum wage.

In 2004, top pay at that same company had slipped to only 2.4 times minimum wage.

This company is industrial based and does work all over the world.

Income Inequality is part of capitalism, but greed does not have to be part of the equation. How much money is enough? For some people no matter how much they make, it will never be enough.
Texashiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:49 AM   #7
Engineer
Elite Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 36,782
Default

Related: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/income...110038873.html

Debt and income disparity top two risks for next decade from over 1,000 experts.
__________________
University of Kentucky Wildcats!

Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue!!!

"Opportunities look a lot like work" - Ashton Kutcher
Engineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 08:51 AM   #8
Engineer
Elite Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 36,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texashiker View Post

Income Inequality is part of capitalism, but greed does not have to be part of the equation.
How much money is enough? For some people no matter how much they make, it will never be enough.
But it always will. No matter how much many people have, they will ALWAYS want more and don't really care who gets stomped on to get it.
__________________
University of Kentucky Wildcats!

Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue!!!

"Opportunities look a lot like work" - Ashton Kutcher
Engineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:04 AM   #9
Texashiker
Lifer
 
Texashiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SouthEast Texas
Posts: 17,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engineer View Post
But it always will. No matter how much many people have, they will ALWAYS want more and don't really care who gets stomped on to get it.
When I was in jr high and high school, the teachers told the students how communism was supposed to be this perfect system. We were told how under communism everyone was supposed to be treated equally.

The problem with communism, people got in way of the system working.

Then the teachers told the students how great capitalism is, and how everyone had an equal chance to make money.

The problem is, people are not taught how to make money. We are taught to learn a skill, get an education, and then go to work for someone else.

Working for someone else is not making money.

Part of the income inequality in America is directly related to what we have been taught about the job market.

Very few schools teach students "how" to make money. Instead of focusing on getting an education and going to work for someone, maybe society needs to teach future generations how to make money.

If people knew how to make money, a lot of our problems would fix themselves.

Last edited by Texashiker; 01-08-2013 at 09:06 AM.
Texashiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:06 AM   #10
Engineer
Elite Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 36,782
Default

EVERYONE can't be 100% money makers, although, it would even out the money distribution if it were possible.
__________________
University of Kentucky Wildcats!

Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue!!!

"Opportunities look a lot like work" - Ashton Kutcher
Engineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:06 AM   #11
Matt1970
Lifer
 
Matt1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 11,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texashiker View Post
When I was in jr high and high school, the teachers told the students how communism was supposed to be this perfect system. We were told how under communism everyone was supposed to be treated equally.

The problem with communism, people got in way of the system working.

Then the teachers told the students how great capitalism is, and how everyone had an equal chance to make money.

The problem is, people are not taught how to make money. We are taught to learn a skill, get an education, and then go to work for someone else.

Working for someone else is not making money.
Part of the income inequality in America is directly related to what we have been taught about the job market.

Very few schools teach students "how" to make money. Instead of focusing on getting an education and going to work for someone, maybe society needs to teach future generations how to make money.

If people knew how to make money, a lot of our problems would fix themselves.
Huh?
Matt1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:08 AM   #12
Texashiker
Lifer
 
Texashiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SouthEast Texas
Posts: 17,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt1970 View Post
Huh?
My point exactly.

If you think working for someone is making money, you have it backwards.

Working for someone else earns you money, it does not make money.
Texashiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 12:51 PM   #13
gevorg
Diamond Member
 
gevorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,793
Default

Income inequality can be heathly and motivating for the economy, the real problem though is the severe distribution of wealth to the top elite.


gevorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:27 PM   #14
EagleKeeper
Discussion Club Moderator
Elite Member
 
EagleKeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bumps west of Denver
Posts: 42,600
Default

When everyone accelerates at the same rate; those that started faster will end up ahead.
If the percentage is the same, the larger will till end up ahead.

One has to increase their share of the pie in order to take advantage of the momentum.
Sitting around complaining that they are not making it will never allow one to make it.
__________________
F15 Air Superiority Fighter - Never has one been lost in aerial combat (104 kills)
EagleKeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:30 PM   #15
TerryMathews
Lifer
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gevorg View Post
Income inequality can be heathly and motivating for the economy, the real problem though is the severe distribution of wealth to the top elite.


This is a flawed study as it assumes that wealth is a 0 sum game. It is not.
__________________
Asrock Z87 Extreme4 | 4770K @ 4.6GHz (46x100 at 1.096V + 0.139V adaptive) | Noctua NH-D14 | 16GB RAM |2x MSI GTX 770 OC Dual Fan | Fractal Design Define R4 | QNIX QX2710 @ 2560x1440 96Hz
My Heatware evals
TerryMathews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:35 PM   #16
ElFenix
Elite Member
Super Moderator
Off Topic
 
ElFenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 94,118
Default

they always start at 1979 because the last couple years of the 70s were a post-war outlier. if you started during any point in the 50s, 60s, or even early 70s, those charts wouldn't look as bad.
__________________
I killed and ate the Fun Mod with some jellybeans and a little Chianti.

AnandTech Mean Moderator
ElFenix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:36 PM   #17
drebo
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engineer View Post
But it always will. No matter how much many people have, they will ALWAYS want more and don't really care who gets stomped on to get it.
Doesn't that work both ways though?

The bottom doesn't really care to work hard for it and would rather see wealth confiscated and then gifted to them. IMO, that's worse.
__________________
"All men are not created equal, and if you believe they are, there's something seriously wrong with you. Some men are destined for greatness. Most aren't. End of story." - Jose Canseco
drebo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:44 PM   #18
sm625
Diamond Member
 
sm625's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,812
Default

The Think Tank Recipe for Income Redistribution (to the top 1%)

I'm not going to name any specific ones, since they were all in on it together. Heritage Foundation, American Enterprise Institute, Center for American Progress, etc, they are all a part of this. I'd call it a conspiracy, but really they do this hundreds if not thousands of times.

They took a concept that sounded good. Like a low top marginal tax rate. Everybody thinks that low taxes is good. So therefore a low top marginal tax rate is good. Then they loaded up all their media arms with that message and they pushed it out onto the masses, with a steady beat, for decades. That is why everyone thinks a low top marginal tax rate is good. No one even debates it, it is just accepted as some sort of axiom. I assure you it is no axiom.

You want a high top marginal tax rate. This forces what would be "excess income" to be rolled back into production, which leads to more jobs and more growth. When you study this for long enough you begin to understand why this tax rate was so high for so many decades. We need to gain back that common sense understanding, because it has been ripped and raped away from us by an incredibly powerful but small group of entrenched wealth with their shiny baubles and gold plated megaphones.

If people could just understand this one key dynamic they can unravel so much of what has gone wrong in the last 30 years.
__________________
I am looking for a cheap upgrade to my 3 year old computer.
AT forum member #1: Buy a 4790k

I am looking for a way to get 10 more fps in TF2.
AT forum member #2: Buy a 4790k
sm625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 02:47 PM   #19
Matt1970
Lifer
 
Matt1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 11,176
Default



There ya go. 85% of the richest of the rich have a college degrees. You were told to stay in school were you not? Now we point the finger at everyone but ourselves.
Matt1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 03:10 PM   #20
Engineer
Elite Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 36,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt1970 View Post


There ya go. 85% of the richest of the rich have a college degrees. You were told to stay in school were you not? Now we point the finger at everyone but ourselves.
So if EVERYONE went to college, we would ALL be OK and thriving right now?
__________________
University of Kentucky Wildcats!

Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue!!!

"Opportunities look a lot like work" - Ashton Kutcher
Engineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 03:12 PM   #21
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt1970 View Post
85% of the richest of the rich have a college degrees.
Which, of course, proves absolutely nothing.
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 03:12 PM   #22
Matt1970
Lifer
 
Matt1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Syracuse NY
Posts: 11,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engineer View Post
So if EVERYONE went to college, we would ALL be OK and thriving right now?
I never said everyone. However with better education comes better ways to make money and improve the economy.
Matt1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 03:56 PM   #23
Texashiker
Lifer
 
Texashiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SouthEast Texas
Posts: 17,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt1970 View Post
I never said everyone. However with better education comes better ways to make money and improve the economy.
Society can not function without people to stock the shelves and pick up the trash.
Texashiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 04:07 PM   #24
Engineer
Elite Member
 
Engineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 36,782
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerryMathews View Post
This is a flawed study as it assumes that wealth is a 0 sum game. It is not.
For the 99%, it nearly is (in terms of REAL dollars).
__________________
University of Kentucky Wildcats!

Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue...Go Big Blue!!!

"Opportunities look a lot like work" - Ashton Kutcher
Engineer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 04:38 PM   #25
DaveSimmons
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 37,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engineer View Post
For the 99%, it nearly is (in terms of REAL dollars).
Except that the greedy "job creators" really have made the pie bigger for everyone over the centuries.

A person in the US living below the poverty line still often has better food and drink, clothing, health care, education, and access to information and entertainment than the minor nobles of a few centuries ago. They also live a much better life than the poor of the 18th century.

I'm not arguing against a little more redistribution of wealth, I'm just pointing out that people like Bill Gates have put a PC or two in most homes while gathering up their billions. So even if they have 99% of the wealth, the size and value of the remaining 1% has grown quite a bit over time.
DaveSimmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.