Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Consumer Electronics > Mobile Devices & Gadgets

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2013, 10:57 PM   #51
kyrax12
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImDonly1 View Post
It is what the Nexus 4 is based on...
and it doesn't have the throttling issues.

Not sure on the rest of the phone skin, etc though.
Which phone would you say is better?

Nexus 4 or Optimus G?
__________________
I worst grammar of ATOT
kyrax12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:14 PM   #52
Eug
Lifer
 
Eug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,263
Default

You should check out the LG skin. I wasn't too enamoured with it. OTOH, the Optimus G does have LTE.
__________________

OS X: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD
iOS: iPad 2 | iPhone 5s
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: Nexus 7 (2012)
Eug is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 11:42 PM   #53
zerocool84
Lifer
 
zerocool84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 32,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyrax12 View Post
Which phone would you say is better?

Nexus 4 or Optimus G?
Once they get the bugs of the N4 worked out it'll be better. I have the Optimus G and I love it, fast as hell but only with ICS which is a HUGE downer coming from a phone with stock JB (Nexus S) as I really miss Google Now but it's still faster with ICS than my Nexus 7 with 4.2.1. I haven't had any experience with LTE yet since I'm on Sprint and it's not officially live in LA yet. The OG has Eco Mode to supposedly help with battery life but I haven't noticed a difference with it off or on. The OG has had great standby battery life for me and that seems to be another current bug with the N4 as well. If you need LTE or a phone right this second get the Optimus G but if you can wait until the Nexus 4 comes back in stock, grab that as I do miss stock Android. ROMs will eventually take care of that on the Optimus G though as some are finally coming out. I don't mind flashing ROMs so that's why I didn't mind picking up the Optimus G since we know that it'll never be super up to date software wise.

Last edited by zerocool84; 01-06-2013 at 11:44 PM.
zerocool84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 05:45 AM   #54
boomhower
Diamond Member
 
boomhower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,548
Default

Without being able to read the article it doesn't mean a whole lot with just the pic. I prefer the iPhone due to the size and my preference of the OS. Android is a wonderful OS, I just prefer iOS. And I like the smaller size. As already mentioned the better Android phones tend to be rather large. Only one I am familiar with that is on the smaller is the Razr M.
__________________
heat
boomhower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:06 AM   #55
foghorn67
Lifer
 
foghorn67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,995
Default

I have a GNex, and I love it. No issues with it.

However, if the Moto Droid RAZR M came with SLCD or SLCD2, I would buy it in a heartbeat. It has a 4.3" screen, but is the size of 4" screen phones.
__________________
AT Garage -Wrong Wheel Drive V6 club member.
foghorn67 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:10 PM   #56
lothar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oyeve View Post
I read fine. It's stupid to insinuate that people who bought phones with big screens bought them because they saw no other choice. Stupid.
Why would anyone pick the Galaxy S3 Mini over the Galaxy S3?
Why would anyone pick the Lumia 820 over the Lumia 920?
Anyone who picks the Galaxy S3 Mini or Lumia over either is quite the moron. Both of those phones are a PoS compared to their higher end counterparts.
I don't blame Deeko for choosing a Lumia 920 over the 820 even though he hates the size of it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusTheBrewer View Post
If you make it to age 30 and have never been arrested you're either still living in your parents basement, part of the 1% or, both.
lothar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:33 PM   #57
QueBert
Lifer
 
QueBert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 19,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lothar View Post
Why would anyone pick the Galaxy S3 Mini over the Galaxy S3?
Why would anyone pick the Lumia 820 over the Lumia 920?
Anyone who picks the Galaxy S3 Mini or Lumia over either is quite the moron. Both of those phones are a PoS compared to their higher end counterparts.
I don't blame Deeko for choosing a Lumia 920 over the 820 even though he hates the size of it.
If a small screen's something you're after not buying a s3 Mini over the regular's stupid. The average consumer doesn't know, understand, or care about hardware specs. Personally I like smaller screens, so I'll take less speed over a big ass screen.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TridenT View Post
No, no, they exist. I've seen them.

They're not usually like hot-hot, but they're like hit it and quit it able.
QueBert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:53 PM   #58
Eug
Lifer
 
Eug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerocool84 View Post
Once they get the bugs of the N4 worked out it'll be better.
They need to get significant volume into people's hands first.
__________________

OS X: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD
iOS: iPad 2 | iPhone 5s
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: Nexus 7 (2012)
Eug is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 09:53 PM   #59
lothar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QueBert View Post
If a small screen's something you're after not buying a s3 Mini over the regular's stupid. The average consumer doesn't know, understand, or care about hardware specs. Personally I like smaller screens, so I'll take less speed over a big ass screen.
So you are the average consumer then.
Go ahead and buy the gimped Galaxy S3 Mini over the regular version.
Go ahead and buy the gimped Lumia 820 over the 920.
Go ahead and buy the gimped One S over the One X.

It certainly won't be a surprise to me that you would do such a thing.
Just don't complain to us here when it's laggy, has a shitty screen, crappy resolution, crappy camera, missing many other features, and not getting the latest OS updates compared to their higher end counterparts.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusTheBrewer View Post
If you make it to age 30 and have never been arrested you're either still living in your parents basement, part of the 1% or, both.
lothar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:05 PM   #60
QueBert
Lifer
 
QueBert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 19,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lothar View Post
So you are the average consumer then.
Go ahead and buy the gimped Galaxy S3 Mini over the regular version.
Go ahead and buy the gimped Lumia 820 over the 920.
Go ahead and buy the gimped One S over the One X.

It certainly won't be a surprise to me that you would do such a thing.
Just don't complain to us here when it's laggy, has a shitty screen, crappy resolution, crappy camera, missing many other features, and not getting the latest OS updates compared to their higher end counterparts.
I wouldn't buy either the mini or the regular, I hate both of them. I like small screens and luckily for me the iPhone gives me the small screen with amazing performance. And even the latest high end Android phone feels laggy to me, so I'd be here complaining regardless if I actually had one.

*shrug*
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TridenT View Post
No, no, they exist. I've seen them.

They're not usually like hot-hot, but they're like hit it and quit it able.
QueBert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:40 PM   #61
lothar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QueBert View Post
I wouldn't buy either the mini or the regular, I hate both of them. I like small screens and luckily for me the iPhone gives me the small screen with amazing performance. And even the latest high end Android phone feels laggy to me, so I'd be here complaining regardless if I actually had one.

*shrug*
So you'd still get a 3.5" iPhone 3GS/4/4S over the 4" iPhone 5 today, despite them being laggy and/or missing many features in iOS 6 compared to the iPhone 5?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusTheBrewer View Post
If you make it to age 30 and have never been arrested you're either still living in your parents basement, part of the 1% or, both.
lothar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 11:56 PM   #62
Rick James Astley
Golden Member
 
Rick James Astley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,392
Default

Well one could argue that the switch from a 3.5" iphone to a 4" one wasn't a big deal because many iphone users always wanted a bigger screen. It does make sense that if a 3.5" screen wasn't a problem , a 4" may only start to become unwieldy for a small fraction and anything larger is a problem. Can we have a show of hands here?

Being 6'6" and gripping a basketball is definitely not the average user yet I couldn't care less and the average user isn't too concerned either because OEM's would have rolled back already. Yes, size is an issue but how often? if you really spend your days grasping for the corners of your smartphone's display, you have my sympathy. Victims of the "bigger is better" stereotype should emerge as a factor for OEM's any day then, if their count is really as significant.

I was comfortable with the Note 2 so I'm definitely on one extreme end of the scale, folks who couldn't handle HD2 and the Sensation are on the other but the average smartphone size has already shifted, in part because OEM's saw it as an opportunity to fight the iphone. When it came out, iphone had one of the biggest displays, Android kicked off it's lineup with 3.2" & 2.8".

Since smaller alternatives wouldn't bother me even though I probably wouldn't consider them, I have no issue with that market being catered too but it doesn't look good for the minority. It's like telling a car maker you want a better engine and they respond to shift gears more efficiently.

Holding my N10:



N4:






__________________
I5-2400-INTEL H67-2x4GB 1333MHz RIPJAWS-128GB Crucial M4
Antec520W HCG-MSI 7950 TWIN FROZR III-Q270 Catleap-MX Revo-WIN8 64

Quote:
Don't sit on my horse Mr. Scott!
Rick James Astley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 12:07 AM   #63
Eug
Lifer
 
Eug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,263
Default

The 3.5" and 4" iPhones feel very similar in some respects, since they are the exact same width.

For my 4.7" Android phone, I've taken to moving my more used icons to the right of the screen, and leave the less used ones on the left. I have a very hard time reaching the left icons with my right thumb one-handed. Going from my current 4.7" phone to the same generation 4.3" would shave the width down from 68 mm to 61 mm, a 7 mm difference. That's very significant IMO, and is a huge advantage for one-handed usability for the general population.
__________________

OS X: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD
iOS: iPad 2 | iPhone 5s
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: Nexus 7 (2012)
Eug is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 01:04 AM   #64
QueBert
Lifer
 
QueBert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 19,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lothar View Post
So you'd still get a 3.5" iPhone 3GS/4/4S over the 4" iPhone 5 today, despite them being laggy and/or missing many features in iOS 6 compared to the iPhone 5?
I have a 4s, while it's not as fast as the 5, it feels faster overall than any Android device I've used. While I'd like to have the 5, they're still too expensive. 4" is a good size, not too big, 4.3 is really the largest I'd go, and honestly even that's pushing it. I had a Galaxy Note for 5 months and didn't like the size. And I went from an Android to the 4S, so it being slower than the 5 was a non issue since it absolutely smoked my Note.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TridenT View Post
No, no, they exist. I've seen them.

They're not usually like hot-hot, but they're like hit it and quit it able.
QueBert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 04:13 AM   #65
lothar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
The 3.5" and 4" iPhones feel very similar in some respects, since they are the exact same width.

For my 4.7" Android phone, I've taken to moving my more used icons to the right of the screen, and leave the less used ones on the left. I have a very hard time reaching the left icons with my right thumb one-handed. Going from my current 4.7" phone to the same generation 4.3" would shave the width down from 68 mm to 61 mm, a 7 mm difference. That's very significant IMO, and is a huge advantage for one-handed usability for the general population.
A lot of people seem to be complaining about the length, not the width on the iPhone 5.
I hear reaching for the top is the problem, not reaching for the left or right.
But then again, this may be selection bias from people that love the 3.5" iPhone size and are stuck in their ways.

How do you know this? You do realize that screen size is measured diagonally right?
What if what you're expecting to save you 7mm in width going from 4.7" to 4.3" only saves you 1-2mm with a different length combination or due to large bezels?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusTheBrewer View Post
If you make it to age 30 and have never been arrested you're either still living in your parents basement, part of the 1% or, both.
lothar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:16 PM   #66
Eug
Lifer
 
Eug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,263
Default

The length is a concern, but the width is a bigger concern to me.

I know that going to 4.3" will save 7 mm because I quoted real world specs. 4.3" in the real world in 2012 is under 61 mm including bezel. Take a look at the specs of the RAZR M. I'm comparing my RAZR HD. There is also room to shrink more.
__________________

OS X: 27" iMac Core i7 870 | 13" MacBook Pro C2D 2.26 P8400 + SSD | 13" MacBook C2D 2.4 T8300 + SSD
iOS: iPad 2 | iPhone 5s
Windows: X3400 Athlon II X3 435 | 11.6" 1810TZ Pentium SU4100 + SSD | Revo R3610 Atom 330 + SSD
Android: Nexus 7 (2012)

Last edited by Eug; 01-08-2013 at 05:31 PM.
Eug is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.