Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Memory and Storage

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2013, 04:29 AM   #51
Puffnstuff
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,294
Default

Having first hand experience with ocz and their ssd's, still have one in another machine, I didn't hessitate to buy my 840 pro. I wouldn't hessitate to buy another.
__________________
Loop 1: EVGA x58 E760 i7 930, HK 3.0 cpu block, EK chipset block & dual bay res, swiftech mcp655 pump, feser x360 rad, scythe fan controller & panaflow fans, bp & feser fittings, distilled water w/primochill liquid utopia, samsung 840 pro 256gb
Loop 2: Dead and buried.
PNY 780 ti gpu, Powered by Enermax Platimax 1350 watt
Puffnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:37 AM   #52
mlauzon76
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 32
Default

I'd go with the Plextor M5P (128GB/256GB/512GB), and with a recent firmware upgrade, it's one of the fastest SSDs on the market. Here's a review I believe was done just before -- or around the same time -- the firmware upgrade came out:

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages...ew_test,1.html

The american site -- I'm in Canada, so I'd use the american site when it goes back up -- isn't working right now, but here's the page for the M5P on the European site:

http://www.plextor-digital.com/index...ro/m5-pro.html

Last edited by mlauzon76; 01-08-2013 at 05:41 AM.
mlauzon76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 10:16 AM   #53
groberts101
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,390
Default

"one of the fastest" is far too vague, IMHO.

Because if that drive didn't have toggle to fall back on?.. it would be a turd compared to the other choices the OP mentioned regardless of firmware advancements.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/731?vs=665
groberts101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 12:55 AM   #54
olavinto
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Default

I've had three OCZ Vertex 2's (all about three years old) and never had any problems and all of them are still in use in different systems as boot and software drives (not for file storage). All updated to the latest firmware (as they should be) - just to point out the fact that there are those who don't consider updating anything important, necessary or that the product is crap if it needs updates (the reqular consumer...). Personally I like updates, the more the better (even if there are no bugs to fix there's always room for improvement). It should also be noted that OCZ has been among the first ones on the market and it usually means more problems.

I just ordered one 128 GB Vector although it's about 10 more expensive than the 28 GB Samsung 840 Pro. I could still change my mind and go with the Samsung - when the other parts in the order come...

They both have 5 year warranty and speed and price are close enough. Visually they are different so that might be one factor. The Samsung is infact quite nice and clean looking. On the other hand the Vector has more color and a nice Indilinx logo... Actually I'm going to get the Samsung instead. It just looks better with the simple black casing and it's about 10 cheaper. And I have a Samsung TV. And Samsung doesn't have financial problems.
olavinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 02:25 PM   #55
Coup27
Golden Member
 
Coup27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England, UK
Posts: 1,788
Default

That was one of the most pointless and useless posts I have ever read.
__________________
Intel i5 4670 | Asus H87I-PLUS | Corsair XMS3 2x4GB | Samsung 840 Evo 120GB SSD | WD Green 3TB HDD | Seasonic SS-360GP | Lian-Li PC-Q27B mITX | Dell 23" IPS Monitor
Coup27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 03:07 PM   #56
Remobz
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puffnstuff View Post
Having first hand experience with ocz and their ssd's, still have one in another machine, I didn't hessitate to buy my 840 pro. I wouldn't hessitate to buy another.
I own a Samsung 840 pro and I would not hesitate to buy another one or recommend one to a potential buyer.
Remobz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 05:07 PM   #57
Whitestar127
Senior Member
 
Whitestar127's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 223
Default

Let's put this into perspective shall we:

Speed:
One of the drives finishes after you have eaten your chocolate. The other one finishes while you are swallowing the last bite.

Reliability:
You are either unlucky, or you are not.

Point being, you probably won't notice any real-life difference unless you are sitting in front of your computer with a stopwatch.
__________________
Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4.4GHz --- GSKILL Sniper 8GB DDR3-1600MHz 1.5v --- Samsung 840 Pro 128MB & 256MB
ASUS P8P67-Deluxe --- ASUS GTX 670 DCII 4GB SLI --- ASUS Xonar Essence STX ---
Corsair HX850W PSU --- Win 7 Home Premium 64-bit --- nVIDIA 340.52 --- Benq XL2411T

Last edited by Whitestar127; 02-26-2013 at 05:11 PM.
Whitestar127 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:16 PM   #58
Drsignguy
Platinum Member
 
Drsignguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,197
Default

Personal preference is my opinion. I have both OCZ and Samsung and happy with both. Each boot into my Os each and every time. Each are their own beast. I recently purchased the 840 pro and the 840 series over the OCZ because it seemed right at the time. I was considering the OCZ vector but the Samsung(s) were a bit less expensive upon purchase. Either way, I am satisfied. Good too, I don't need any problems anyway.
__________________
i7 2600k, i7 2600K, Q9450, Q6600, Q6600, E7200, Surface Pro, Laptop, Mitsubishi 52", Vizio 39"
Drsignguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:27 PM   #59
poohbear
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,922
Default

I have a OCZ Vector 3 & it works great. I dont usually post on how good & reliable it is, sale with the 98% of OCZ owners out there. But u better believe if it died on me i'd be posting in EVERY OCZ thread warning people not to buy it. The point is ppl who are happy & satisfied dont go posting on threads how well it works, but the minority that had one fail do so very vocally!
__________________
Desktop: 4790k | Noctua NH-D14 | 16GB (2x8gb) Crucial Ballistex @ CL9 | Asrock Z97 OC Formula | Gigabyte GTX 670 SLI | 250gb Samsung 840 Evo & 240gb OCZ Vertex 3 MI & 2TB WD Black | Auzentech Forte 7.1 | Seasonic 760wt Platinum | DELL U2711 @ 1440p | Corsair 300R | Win 8.1
Ultrabook: Zenbook UX32LN | i5 4200u | 8GB RAM | Nvidia 840m | IPS Matte @ 1080p | 256GB SSD | Win8.1
poohbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:50 PM   #60
Phynaz
Diamond Member
 
Phynaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,477
Default

Let's see how many people are going to keep replying to a two month old thread in which the OP never returned
Phynaz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 11:13 PM   #61
olavinto
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coup27 View Post
That was one of the most pointless and useless posts I have ever read.
Pretty much. Just points out that most likely you can't go wrong with either one... to simplify. And to show at least some support towards OCZ since I've had no problems with their SSDs.
olavinto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 02:24 PM   #62
jacksonn24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Default

i have 4 ocz ssds 2 agility 3s and 2 vectors a 128gb and 256 gb have had no problems with them at all.
jacksonn24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 07:02 PM   #63
Emulex
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,550
Default

dude OCZ is in real bad shape right now. so consider warranty on-notice. their return policy is kind of weak.

Also the vector throttled QD=1 so if run it in IDE mode for whatever reason no ncq you will never get decent speeds. (throttling based on QD is high end SAN theory/not far off LSI fastpath)

i have had only one reset (drive was fine) with 840 pro 256gb. The 830's all running on a 9260-8i with fastpath in raid-10 (esx) are solid. just have to tune the quantum and queuedepth to keep them busy.

I'd say the vector is a great product design but their support and current financial status versus samsung is scary.
__________________
-------------------------
NAS: Dell 530 Q6600 8gb 4tb headless VHP
KID PC1: Mac Pro Dual nehalem - 6gb - GF120 - HP ZR30W
Browser: Dell 530 Q6600 4GB - Kingston 96gb -gt240- hp LP3065 IPS - 7ult
Tabs: IPAD 1,2,3 IPOD3,HTC flyer, Galaxy Tab - all rooted/jb
Couch1: Macbook Air/Macbook White
Couch2: Macbook Pro 17 2.66 Matte screen - 8GB - SSD
HTPC: Asus C2Q8300/X25-V - Geforce 430- 7ult - Antec MicroFusion 350
Emulex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 09:15 PM   #64
blackened23
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drsignguy View Post
Personal preference is my opinion. I have both OCZ and Samsung and happy with both. Each boot into my Os each and every time. Each are their own beast. I recently purchased the 840 pro and the 840 series over the OCZ because it seemed right at the time. I was considering the OCZ vector but the Samsung(s) were a bit less expensive upon purchase. Either way, I am satisfied. Good too, I don't need any problems anyway.
Same here. I've heard many OCZ horror stories but I haven't had any issues, in fact I still have a vertex 2 running in one of my machines for some 2 years now. As far as the topic at hand, I think they're both great drives. Tough call.
blackened23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2013, 03:13 AM   #65
Unit'Igor
Member
 
Unit'Igor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hvar,Croatia
Posts: 27
Default

I cant believe what you people talking about,and guy who started this thread,how dares he to compare Samsung with OCZ,thats insulting for Samsung.
You can compare OCZ and Corsair.
You can compare Samsung with Plextor.
But you cant compare Samsung with OCZ.
Unit'Igor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2013, 05:06 AM   #66
bononos
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olavinto View Post
Pretty much. Just points out that most likely you can't go wrong with either one... to simplify. And to show at least some support towards OCZ since I've had no problems with their SSDs.
No, OCZ is notorious for higher failure rates. Maybe their latest Vector model is ok.
bononos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2013, 05:38 AM   #67
poohbear
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,922
Default

I've owned 2 ocz vertex 3, never had any problems. I always used the latest firmware, they're great. U have to understand OCZ sells huge amounts of SSDs & if 1% were bad, those ppl would be much more vocal than corsair or plextor customers (simply cause they dont move as many SSDs)
__________________
Desktop: 4790k | Noctua NH-D14 | 16GB (2x8gb) Crucial Ballistex @ CL9 | Asrock Z97 OC Formula | Gigabyte GTX 670 SLI | 250gb Samsung 840 Evo & 240gb OCZ Vertex 3 MI & 2TB WD Black | Auzentech Forte 7.1 | Seasonic 760wt Platinum | DELL U2711 @ 1440p | Corsair 300R | Win 8.1
Ultrabook: Zenbook UX32LN | i5 4200u | 8GB RAM | Nvidia 840m | IPS Matte @ 1080p | 256GB SSD | Win8.1
poohbear is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2013, 10:14 PM   #68
Dadofamunky
Platinum Member
 
Dadofamunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,183
Default

I can't complain at all about my 840 Pro; I also think that OCZ had a very severe quality problem for awhile but I get the general impression around here that most of that has gone away and that OCZ products are now generally reliable. Of course we will always see individual anecdotal evidence otherwise; I'm amazed our OP experienced bricking so quickly! As for Samsung fanboyism, I find it amusing that someone would think someone would be capable of being a fanboy for a massive Korean electronics conglomerate. Kinda pathetic.
__________________
i7 2600K@4.35 GHz, Asus Sabertooth Z77, 16 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24-1T 1.5V, Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD , 2x1TB Spinpoint F3 Raid 0, Seagate 3TB external USB3 drive, Samsung BluRay, Corsair GS600, CM Hyper 212+ push-pull, EVGA GTX 570, 2x Samsung 2333T PVA panels, Win 7 64-bit

What's that chip you got, a Dorito?
Dadofamunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 08:07 AM   #69
alan1476
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
Default

I am a systems builder for high end gaming consoles. As of today I only use 3 SSDs, the Vector the Samsung 840 Pro and the Corsair Neutron GTX. You have to understand that there is a lot more to to these drives than just benchmarks. I ahave installed at least 20 Samsung 840 Pros, 15 Vectors and about 20 Corsair Neutron GTX SSDs. They all have their good points and none of them have anything bad I can say about them, except for the fact that OCZ might not be around to honor their 5 year warrantee. ( money for R&D is not their strong point) where the other 2 suppliers have no such problems, that said, The 4K writes to me are most important statistic for a bevy of reasons. In this category the Vector is the best. Not by a lot but faster, now we come to the financial viability of all three of these drives. The Vector can be almost 100USD more than the Samsung 840 Pro in the 512gb flavor. The Neutron is almost 60 USD more than the Samsung 840 Pro 512 and it only has 480gbs. So in the end my choice and if I am asked , I would buy the Samsung 840 Pro 512gb SSD every time. JMHO.
alan1476 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 09:21 AM   #70
BrightCandle
Diamond Member
 
BrightCandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,556
Default

The last reliability figures I saw still said that ocz drives were still 3 times more likely to fail than anyone else's, they were worse than hard drives. That was about a year ago and I haven't seen any more recent figures so it could have changed with their recent drives, but its still a data point to be concerned about. Not least because this is a company that has a long history of being dishonest about its products, going back to PSUs and RAM as well as its SSDs.

I just don't ocz's products are worth the risk anymore, they aren't better enough to make taking a risk on them worthwhile IMHO.
__________________
i7 3930k @4.4, 2xMSI GTX 680, 16GB Corsair 2133 RAM, Crucial m4 500GB, Soundblaster Z
Custom watercooled by 2x MCR 320 and 1 MCR 480
Zowie Evo CL EC2, Corsair K70, Asus Rog Swift PG278Q
BrightCandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2013, 09:59 AM   #71
alan1476
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrightCandle View Post
The last reliability figures I saw still said that ocz drives were still 3 times more likely to fail than anyone else's, they were worse than hard drives. That was about a year ago and I haven't seen any more recent figures so it could have changed with their recent drives, but its still a data point to be concerned about. Not least because this is a company that has a long history of being dishonest about its products, going back to PSUs and RAM as well as its SSDs.

I just don't ocz's products are worth the risk anymore, they aren't better enough to make taking a risk on them worthwhile IMHO.
I couldn't agree more with you BrightCandle. OCZ has not proved themselves reliable to the point where someone should spent over 500USD on one of their SSDs. Where Samsung most probably had the most reliable ( The 830 ) SSD on the market. The choice is clear.
alan1476 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ocz vector, samsung 830, samsung 840 pro, ssd

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.