Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-19-2012, 08:33 AM   #51
ichy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,932
Default

This must be a joke. Any police force that tried this would be sued to oblivion.

Quote:
"They may not be doing anything but walking their dog," he said. "But they're going to have to prove it." . . .
What kind of buffoon would say something like that? This is America, people have the right not to say anything to the police.
__________________
“Our belief is not a belief. Our principles are not a faith. We do not rely soley upon science and reason, because these are necessary rather than sufficient factors, but we distrust anything that contradicts science or outrages reason. We may differ on many things, but what we respect is free inquiry, openmindedness, and the pursuit of ideas for their own sake.”
-Christopher Hitchens
ichy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 04:13 PM   #52
Fern
Elite Member
Super Moderator
 
Fern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains
Posts: 24,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TastesLikeChicken View Post
A bit of an important part of the article that seems to have been omitted by the OP and the HuffPo article:

"Stovall told the group of almost 40 residents that beginning in 2013, the department would deploy a new street crimes unit to high crime areas on foot to take back the streets."

This all sounds really ominous when that bit of info isn't included. Otherwise it's pretty meh. The police have been using that tactic for decades in high crime areas.
Yeah. Was going to post this.

Whole thing seems so weird I googled to find out WTH was going on.

Doesn't seem like a big deal once you realize it's focused on high crime areas. From what I've seen, the people who actually live in those areas often like this type of thing.

Fern
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Fern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 04:49 PM   #53
TastesLikeChicken
Lifer
 
TastesLikeChicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 4th fairway
Posts: 15,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fern View Post
Yeah. Was going to post this.

Whole thing seems so weird I googled to find out WTH was going on.

Doesn't seem like a big deal once you realize it's focused on high crime areas. From what I've seen, the people who actually live in those areas often like this type of thing.

Fern
I'd bet just about everyone in those areas likes it except for the criminals.

I fail to see what the big deal is. First of all, this isn't happening to "Arkansas," it's happening to a small town in Arkansas. Nor is there anything resembling a Police State. The hyperbole needle is being pegged to maximum.

One more bit of irony in threads like this is that the anti-authoritarian types in here love to drone on about how fear is being use to control the public. And they make that point by spreading fear about authority. My shirts get perfectly pressed every time I read this kind of thread.
__________________
If at first you don't succeed...skydiving is probably not for you.
TastesLikeChicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 05:05 PM   #54
ichy
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,932
Default

I'm generally pro-law enforcement but stopping people at random, arresting them for not showing ID and forcing them to tell you where they're going is unconstitutional. The cops can ask, but it's also people's right to refuse to answer and walk away.

Law & order means that the cops have to obey the law as well.
__________________
“Our belief is not a belief. Our principles are not a faith. We do not rely soley upon science and reason, because these are necessary rather than sufficient factors, but we distrust anything that contradicts science or outrages reason. We may differ on many things, but what we respect is free inquiry, openmindedness, and the pursuit of ideas for their own sake.”
-Christopher Hitchens
ichy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 06:07 PM   #55
Hayabusa Rider
Elite Member
 
Hayabusa Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhhnn View Post
Lashing out in denial, ehh?

Authoritarianism exists as a continuum, shades of grey. That's a difficult concept for black & white thinkers. If Obama is more authoritarian than I'd like, he's certainly less so than many of the heroes of Conservatives, or of the corporate authoritarian structures they often champion.

Obama supporters as Authoritarians? We're the hippy-dippy mamby-pamby Liberals, remember?

We'd support even less authoritarian figures, and often do when they present themselves. That can't be said of Conservatives.
So tell us, does the NSA illegally access Constitutionally protected private information? How do you know either way? If not, why not?
__________________
My favorite TV quote by Mr. Spock

"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose."
Hayabusa Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 06:55 PM   #56
Jhhnn
Lifer
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Denver Co
Posts: 22,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa Rider View Post
So tell us, does the NSA illegally access Constitutionally protected private information? How do you know either way? If not, why not?
And now, obfuscation.

If the NSA is doing such things, it's because of the Patriot act & the overblown Terrarist Threat! fearmongering of the Bush years that made it seem acceptable to the average citizen.

If it is occurring then it's always tough to quit, isn't it? particularly when congressional Repubs put the Patriot act into an all or nothing proposition, despite Dems' efforts to soften it.

If such powers are used, then the Executive gets a lot of sniping about it, and if abandoned & followed by a major terrorist attack, then the Right Wing authoritarian raving about not protecting America would be epic.

The Executive branch is stuck following the dictates of Congress in such matters, whether they want to be or not.

That's tough for a conspiracy theorist to accept, I'm sure.
Jhhnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 09:39 PM   #57
Hayabusa Rider
Elite Member
 
Hayabusa Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhhnn View Post
And now, obfuscation.

If the NSA is doing such things, it's because of the Patriot act & the overblown Terrarist Threat! fearmongering of the Bush years that made it seem acceptable to the average citizen.

If it is occurring then it's always tough to quit, isn't it? particularly when congressional Repubs put the Patriot act into an all or nothing proposition, despite Dems' efforts to soften it.

If such powers are used, then the Executive gets a lot of sniping about it, and if abandoned & followed by a major terrorist attack, then the Right Wing authoritarian raving about not protecting America would be epic.

The Executive branch is stuck following the dictates of Congress in such matters, whether they want to be or not.

That's tough for a conspiracy theorist to accept, I'm sure.
Nope. Completely wrong. I knew you'd "but but BOOSH". This is completely a decision made by this administration. Was it started by Obama? No, but it's lovingly embraced by him. You don't even know what the issue is, as demonstrated by your blind guesses. This has nothing to do with the Patriot Act. You're playing apologist.
__________________
My favorite TV quote by Mr. Spock

"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose."
Hayabusa Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 10:20 PM   #58
Jhhnn
Lifer
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Denver Co
Posts: 22,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa Rider View Post
Nope. Completely wrong. I knew you'd "but but BOOSH". This is completely a decision made by this administration. Was it started by Obama? No, but it's lovingly embraced by him. You don't even know what the issue is, as demonstrated by your blind guesses. This has nothing to do with the Patriot Act. You're playing apologist.
And you're playing the usual "I know a secret!" routine so loved by conspiracy theorists. What is it that you think you know about the NSA, anyway? What can you offer to back it up?
Jhhnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 10:26 PM   #59
Hayabusa Rider
Elite Member
 
Hayabusa Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhhnn View Post
And you're playing the usual "I know a secret!" routine so loved by conspiracy theorists. What is it that you think you know about the NSA, anyway? What can you offer to back it up?
One thing I can do is read

apologize away
__________________
My favorite TV quote by Mr. Spock

"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose."
Hayabusa Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 10:27 PM   #60
bradley
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,002
Default

In the last fifteen years, we've broken so free from the US Constitution in a concerted Progressive effort, it's almost too late to stop these type scenarios.
bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 11:37 PM   #61
mizzou
Diamond Member
 
mizzou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,834
Default

"We're going to do it to everybody," he said

No...No you are not...
mizzou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2012, 11:41 PM   #62
Screech
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa Rider View Post
One thing I can do is read

apologize away
I would also add

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...nsadatacenter/

from the previous thread on it.

interesting stuff...
Screech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 07:34 AM   #63
Jhhnn
Lifer
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Denver Co
Posts: 22,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa Rider View Post
One thing I can do is read

apologize away
That doesn't contradict anything I've said in the slightest. The Executive branch will, by it's very nature, attempt to maintain whatever "national security" powers congress has granted it, regardless of which party is in power, for the reasons I offered above.

That doesn't mean I support some sort of massive domestic dragnet you theorize- there is no evidence to show that it is happening, but rather that you think it could be, which are entirely different things.

I support the EFF's efforts & the idea that the judge should receive evidence in camera, for starters. I also support Congress letting all of the Terrarist Threat! legislation lapse quietly into oblivion, where it belongs.

I doubt that your fellow conservatives will see it that way, at all, given their history.
Jhhnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 07:47 AM   #64
sm625
Diamond Member
 
sm625's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,791
Default

The police state has been in arkansas for a long time now. How do you think clinton got to be president?
__________________
I am looking for a cheap upgrade to my 3 year old computer.
AT forum member #1: Buy a 4790k

I am looking for a way to get 10 more fps in TF2.
AT forum member #2: Buy a 4790k
sm625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 10:51 AM   #65
Hayabusa Rider
Elite Member
 
Hayabusa Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhhnn View Post
That doesn't contradict anything I've said in the slightest. The Executive branch will, by it's very nature, attempt to maintain whatever "national security" powers congress has granted it, regardless of which party is in power, for the reasons I offered above.

That doesn't mean I support some sort of massive domestic dragnet you theorize- there is no evidence to show that it is happening, but rather that you think it could be, which are entirely different things.

I support the EFF's efforts & the idea that the judge should receive evidence in camera, for starters. I also support Congress letting all of the Terrarist Threat! legislation lapse quietly into oblivion, where it belongs.

I doubt that your fellow conservatives will see it that way, at all, given their history.
Bad apology my neocon friend. This isn't congress, this is the executive branch, so that shoots that down. The "you don't know" is precisely the point you intentionally miss. The justice department says the eff and others need to demonstrate illegal activities and at the same time cannot get that without a successful legal challenge, a perfect catch 22.

Still you squirm by pointing to other things I never approved of. Yes, dems like you can be and are neocons. As for me I disapprove of a small community doing whats being done in Arkansas, but theres a far larger issue that you stand for. Party over all is your motto.
__________________
My favorite TV quote by Mr. Spock

"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose."
Hayabusa Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 05:03 PM   #66
cubby1223
Lifer
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,410
Default

I leave the forum for a good while, and when I come back the quality of threads in P&N is even lower than before????

Let's actually see this plan form, let's see them actually pursue this, before jumping to the conclusion that America is bat-shit crazy?

Both the conservative and the liberal "media junkies" go off about all these events that never come to pass. There never will be a follow-up story on this, within a week it'll be completely forgotten. And the media will have pushed you onto to a new potential threat to be pissed off about.
cubby1223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 07:27 PM   #67
Jhhnn
Lifer
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Denver Co
Posts: 22,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayabusa Rider View Post
Bad apology my neocon friend. This isn't congress, this is the executive branch, so that shoots that down. The "you don't know" is precisely the point you intentionally miss. The justice department says the eff and others need to demonstrate illegal activities and at the same time cannot get that without a successful legal challenge, a perfect catch 22.

Still you squirm by pointing to other things I never approved of. Yes, dems like you can be and are neocons. As for me I disapprove of a small community doing whats being done in Arkansas, but theres a far larger issue that you stand for. Party over all is your motto.
From your own link-

Quote:
SAN FRANCISCO, California—Warrantless wiretapping by the National Security Agency began as a Bush-era program in October 2001; in 2008, the government essentially allowed the practice in the FISA Amendments Act. The same year, the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed lawsuits challenging the surveillance.
So it's not just about the Executive branch, but Congress first & foremost. As I've offered & you choose to ignore, the Executive will use & try to keep any national security powers Congress grants. Period, no matter who's in the big chair.

4th amendment issues wrt electronic communication are in the process of being sorted out, with both Congress & the Executive coming down on what we both see as the wrong side of the issue.

It doesn't matter what the Executive wants if Congress allows the applicable statutes to expire- the Executive would have no legal grounds to continue, Constitutional issues aside. Only action by the Judiciary can alter that, action specifically disallowing what Congress intended when they gave questionable powers to the Executive.

I've agreed with the EFF when they offer that the judge should first view pertinent documentation in camera to determine if the govt's state secrets & national security claims are legit, and to determine if the plaintiff actually has standing, if they were, in fact, actually under surveillance.If the judge rules in favor of the EFF, then the govt will undoubtedly appeal, and legal wrangling will continue.

I do not support such surveillance, despite your claims that I do. I've pointed out that Congress can put an end to it by doing nothing, letting the supporting legislation expire. That seems unlikely, even though it's the right thing to do, for the reasons I've already laid out. Therefore, the legal battle will continue.

Which really has nearly nothing to do with the usual small southern town authorities getting all in the face of "undesirables" in "high crime areas"... like someplace a fine upstanding conservative citizen caught a whiff of marijuana smoke... where people who don't have air conditioning drink beer in public on the front porch, fer crissakes... where a person having more than one old car that won't run calls themselves a "collector"...
Jhhnn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 08:55 AM   #68
Hayabusa Rider
Elite Member
 
Hayabusa Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 37,913
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jhhnn View Post
From your own link-



So it's not just about the Executive branch, but Congress first & foremost. As I've offered & you choose to ignore, the Executive will use & try to keep any national security powers Congress grants. Period, no matter who's in the big chair.

4th amendment issues wrt electronic communication are in the process of being sorted out, with both Congress & the Executive coming down on what we both see as the wrong side of the issue.

It doesn't matter what the Executive wants if Congress allows the applicable statutes to expire- the Executive would have no legal grounds to continue, Constitutional issues aside. Only action by the Judiciary can alter that, action specifically disallowing what Congress intended when they gave questionable powers to the Executive.

I've agreed with the EFF when they offer that the judge should first view pertinent documentation in camera to determine if the govt's state secrets & national security claims are legit, and to determine if the plaintiff actually has standing, if they were, in fact, actually under surveillance.If the judge rules in favor of the EFF, then the govt will undoubtedly appeal, and legal wrangling will continue.

I do not support such surveillance, despite your claims that I do. I've pointed out that Congress can put an end to it by doing nothing, letting the supporting legislation expire. That seems unlikely, even though it's the right thing to do, for the reasons I've already laid out. Therefore, the legal battle will continue.

Which really has nearly nothing to do with the usual small southern town authorities getting all in the face of "undesirables" in "high crime areas"... like someplace a fine upstanding conservative citizen caught a whiff of marijuana smoke... where people who don't have air conditioning drink beer in public on the front porch, fer crissakes... where a person having more than one old car that won't run calls themselves a "collector"...
Where in the law does it require Obama to block legal challenges? Not defend against them, but step into the legal process to block even asking? "National security", the neocon ace card.

As far as the point, it has to do with small timers in arkansas as much as Mussolini condemning crying about some village locking up drunks. You'll miss that too.

You'll continue to defend the greater crime and others will too. I deplore both. You make excuses, and bad ones at that. Note no one is stepping up for you.

It's about the abuse of power.
__________________
My favorite TV quote by Mr. Spock

"I object to you. I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without constructive purpose."
Hayabusa Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:02 PM   #69
Zodiark1593
Golden Member
 
Zodiark1593's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,024
Default

Considering I always leave all forms of my ID home when I'm not the driver, glad I'm not in Arkansas.
Zodiark1593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:08 PM   #70
SandEagle
Lifer
 
SandEagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middle East Side
Posts: 16,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zodiark1593 View Post
Considering I always leave all forms of my ID home when I'm not the driver, glad I'm not in Arkansas.
do you leave your brain at home as well? if this can happen in Arkansas, it can happen in any of the other states. it is the catalyst to test the waters somewhere first to see what the public reaction would be.
__________________
Fear is what keeps you alive. Never not be afraid.
SandEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:21 PM   #71
Zodiark1593
Golden Member
 
Zodiark1593's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SandEagle View Post
do you leave your brain at home as well? if this can happen in Arkansas, it can happen in any of the other states. it is the catalyst to test the waters somewhere first to see what the public reaction would be.
It's purposeful. Police ask for ID, they can take a hike for all I care as I'd be doing nothing that would require me to carry it.
Zodiark1593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:24 PM   #72
SandEagle
Lifer
 
SandEagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middle East Side
Posts: 16,684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zodiark1593 View Post
It's purposeful. Police ask for ID, they can take a hike for all I care as I'd be doing nothing that would require me to carry it.
i understand that. i was commenting on the 'glad I'm not in Arkansas' part
__________________
Fear is what keeps you alive. Never not be afraid.
SandEagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:25 PM   #73
Zodiark1593
Golden Member
 
Zodiark1593's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SandEagle View Post
i understand that. i was commenting on the 'glad I'm not in Arkansas' part
Ah, ok, misunderstanding then.
Zodiark1593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 06:33 PM   #74
Vic Vega
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,537
Default

Didn't Fresno do this a while ago?

Anyone living in Atlanta in the 80s remembers when they used to CLOSE DOWN the down town area after dark and put up chain link fences around down town and setup checkpoints.

I guess a fair question is (and I am not saying this is a good or bad thing) but how bad is bad enough when something like this is required and who gets to decide?
Vic Vega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 08:52 PM   #75
SAWYER
Lifer
 
SAWYER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 14,824
Default

I live 20 miniutes from this town, I would feel safe walking down any street there..what a joke.

Crime from 99-2010
http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime...-Arkansas.html

Last edited by SAWYER; 12-24-2012 at 08:54 PM.
SAWYER is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.