Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Video Cards and Graphics

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2012
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

View Poll Results: Better Architecture?
Kepler 36 36.36%
GCN 63 63.64%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-10-2012, 02:13 PM   #1
Red Hawk
Golden Member
 
Red Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,551
Default Kepler vs GCN: Which is the better architecture

I'm not talking about which company has the superior graphics cards at their price points on the market right now. I'm talking about the actual architecture. Transistor for transistor, millimeter for millimeter, which is the superior architecture, and why?
__________________
Desktop: Thermaltake V-4 Black case | Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3 | Core i5 2500k @ 4 GHz | ASUS Radeon HD 7870 DirectCU II 2 GB @ 1010 MHz
8 GB G.Skill DDR3 RAM 1333 MHz | 120GB OCZ Vertex 3 SSD & Western Digital 500 GB HDD | Antec 650w PSU | Acer 1080p 60 Hz 21.5'' | Windows 8 Pro
Laptop: ASUS K52Jr-X5 | Core i3-350m @ 2.26 GHz| Mobility Radeon HD 5470 1 GB @ 750 MHz
4 GB DDR3 RAM | 90 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD | 1366x768 15.6'' | Windows 8 Pro /Ubuntu 12
Red Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:21 PM   #2
ShintaiDK
Diamond Member
 
ShintaiDK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 5,911
Default

Kepler. Higher efficiency.
__________________
MiniITX - Intel i5 4670
Board - Intel DH87FB
SSD - Crucial M500 480GB mSATA
Memory - Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x8GB 1600Mhz 1.35V
Case - Sugo SG08B with 600W PSU
GPU - Zotac GTX 680 2GB
ShintaiDK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:24 PM   #3
moonbogg
Golden Member
 
moonbogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,981
Default

Kepler, more perf/watt, more scalable. Also much cheaper (unless your are a consumer).
__________________
Info about expensive garbage goes here
moonbogg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:26 PM   #4
VulgarDisplay
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moonbogg View Post
Kepler, more perf/watt, more scalable. Also much cheaper (unless your are a consumer).
I'm not trolling, but kepler can scale to higher clocks, but it loses to lower clocked AMD hardware.
VulgarDisplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:33 PM   #5
Skurge
Diamond Member
 
Skurge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Namibia
Posts: 4,335
Default

Just for gaming or does it include compute?
__________________
Intel Core i5-3570K 4.5Ghz|Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H|8GB DDR3-1333|XFX Radeon HD 5850 1GB|Corsair Force F120 SSD|2TB WD Caviar|Windows 7 Home Premuim x64|Dell UltraSharp U2713HM|Logitech G27 Racing Wheel|Google Nexus 4 16GB
Skurge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:36 PM   #6
wand3r3r
Golden Member
 
wand3r3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,270
Default

I would expect GCN to perform better in the future with wider buses, more compute power etc.

I don't care about watts when they are this close and you get more performance with the extra watts.
wand3r3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:37 PM   #7
3DVagabond
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 5,251
Default

We've never experienced full Kepler. People thinking GK104 is better is funny, seeing as how limited it is.
3DVagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:39 PM   #8
96Firebird
Golden Member
 
96Firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skurge View Post
Just for gaming or does it include compute?
This. Usage matters.
__________________
i5-2500k @ stock| Corsair A50 | ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3 | 8GB DDR3-1600 | Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB (850/2000) | XFX Core 750W PSU | 64GB Crucial M4 SSD | Corsair 400r

BF3: JDubz313
96Firebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:41 PM   #9
Rvenger
Diamond Member
 
Rvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,867
Default

I can't give an accurate justification since basically GK104 and Tahiti are comparing an apple to an orange in computational aspects. If I saw BigK then I would have been able to tell you.

If AMD were to strip the compute out of their products, ramp up the streaming processors and clock speed, and lower the bus width then we should have a close to equally efficient product to GK104. I believe GCN is every bit as efficient as Kepler if we had an apple to apple comparison.
__________________
Retired Mod@ MSI HQ
i7-4770k @ Stock because it runs too hot and Asrock won't fix bios w/ Phanteks PH-TC12DX - Asrock Z87 Extreme 4 - 16gb Corsair Vengeance 1866mhz - MSI GTX 780 3gb - 128gb Samsung 840 Pro - 240gb OCZ Vertex Plus R2 - 32gb OCZ Onyx cached w/ 1.5tb Seagate Green - NZXT Hale 82 850w - CM Storm Trooper

Last edited by Rvenger; 12-10-2012 at 02:45 PM.
Rvenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:44 PM   #10
Red Hawk
Golden Member
 
Red Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skurge View Post
Just for gaming or does it include compute?
Everything overall.
__________________
Desktop: Thermaltake V-4 Black case | Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3 | Core i5 2500k @ 4 GHz | ASUS Radeon HD 7870 DirectCU II 2 GB @ 1010 MHz
8 GB G.Skill DDR3 RAM 1333 MHz | 120GB OCZ Vertex 3 SSD & Western Digital 500 GB HDD | Antec 650w PSU | Acer 1080p 60 Hz 21.5'' | Windows 8 Pro
Laptop: ASUS K52Jr-X5 | Core i3-350m @ 2.26 GHz| Mobility Radeon HD 5470 1 GB @ 750 MHz
4 GB DDR3 RAM | 90 GB OCZ Agility 3 SSD | 1366x768 15.6'' | Windows 8 Pro /Ubuntu 12
Red Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:50 PM   #11
Sable
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 720
Default

Really?!
__________________
Fractal Design R3 Arctic White || Asus P8Z77-V Pro ||Intel i5 2500k @ 4.6ghz 1.34v || Arctic Freezer i30 HSF || 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP @ 1600mhz || eVGA GTX 680 2GB || Samsung 830 256GB SSD || WD Caviar Black 1TB || Samsung 500GB + WD Caviar Black 500GB RAID1 || 2x WD Green 2TB RAID1 || Corsair AX750 || BenQ XL2420T
Sable is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 02:56 PM   #12
SolMiester
Diamond Member
 
SolMiester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Napier, New Zealand
Posts: 3,931
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3DVagabond View Post
We've never experienced full Kepler. People thinking GK104 is better is funny, seeing as how limited it is.
And yet Kepler still keeps up with GCN even when limited...!
__________________
HOME-LianLi PC-9F,ASRock P67Pro3, i5 2500k @4Ghz, 8Gb HyperX, 9600GT, Corsair Force 120 SSD HP L2045w, HP ML350G5 2012 Host-Plex/W8/MINT..
WORK-Silverstone PS07 ASRock Z77 Pro4-M, i5 3470 @4Ghz, 16GB HyperX, GT630, 3 x Samsung S22B420
My Super 6 Calais
SolMiester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:03 PM   #13
lavaheadache
Diamond Member
 
lavaheadache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cape Cod MA
Posts: 5,565
Default

where is the "don't know yet" option?
__________________
Video Card Nut

Heat 125-0-0
lavaheadache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:05 PM   #14
badb0y
Diamond Member
 
badb0y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 3,544
Default

Strictly from a gaming point of view I think Kepler is better(more efficient) but I don't really use the compute power of HD 7970 so I wouldn't know if the overall architecture is better.

Voted Kepler.
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.6 ghz with XSPC Rasa - Sapphire HD 7970 @ 1200/1400 with Koolance Full Cover Block - 12GB DDR3 1600 G.Skill Ripjaws RAM - SilverStone RV03 - NZXT Hale90 750W PSU -MSI P67A-GD65 - 1TB Samsung HDD - OCZ Solid II 120 GB
Heatware: badboydiablo 22-0-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil deGrasse Tyson
God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance.
badb0y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:05 PM   #15
jones377
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 420
Default

I'd give a slight edge to Kepler but I don't think we've been this close in a very long time.
jones377 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:06 PM   #16
Rvenger
Diamond Member
 
Rvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,867
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolMiester View Post
And yet Kepler still keeps up with GCN even when limited...!


In gaming, not compute. Read my post above.
__________________
Retired Mod@ MSI HQ
i7-4770k @ Stock because it runs too hot and Asrock won't fix bios w/ Phanteks PH-TC12DX - Asrock Z87 Extreme 4 - 16gb Corsair Vengeance 1866mhz - MSI GTX 780 3gb - 128gb Samsung 840 Pro - 240gb OCZ Vertex Plus R2 - 32gb OCZ Onyx cached w/ 1.5tb Seagate Green - NZXT Hale 82 850w - CM Storm Trooper
Rvenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:07 PM   #17
Genx87
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 33,297
Default

Which Kepler? In gaming I think the GK104 does rather well. In compute I think GK104 is pretty decent compared to GCN. But the full sized compute Kepler should wipe the floor with GCN in compute.
__________________
"Communism can be defined as the longest route from capitalism to capitalism."
"Capitalism is the unequal distribution of wealth. Socialism is the equal distribution of poverty"
"The Democrats seems to be the kind of people who switch to Geico and lose money." -Jon Stewert

Failure of Public Education
Global Warming causes this
Genx87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:09 PM   #18
blastingcap
Diamond Member
 
blastingcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShintaiDK View Post
Kepler. Higher efficiency.
Also more features. async, no-adapter Surround, cuda/physx, etc
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox View Post
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
Main: 3570K + HD7970 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS

NAS and HTPC/workstation: Supermicro MBD-X9SCM + G530 + 16GB ECC; ASUS P8B WS + i3-3220; 1.168TB of Intel/Crucial/Samsung SSDs + 26TB of WD/Hitachi HDDs
blastingcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:13 PM   #19
3DVagabond
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Christchurch, NZ
Posts: 5,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolMiester View Post
And yet Kepler still keeps up with GCN even when limited...!
Depends on what you are measuring. CLBenchmark

This is why I say we need full Kepler to compare them.
3DVagabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:23 PM   #20
Ajay
Golden Member
 
Ajay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,337
Default

This poll is too vague.
__________________
Asus P6T Deluxe V2, Ci7 920 @ 4GHz, Corsair H100, 2x240GB SanDisk Extreme SSDs in Raid 0, WD VR 300 HD, MSI GTX 680 Power Edition @ 1200MHz, 12GB G.Skill Riojaws DDR3 1600, Corair 850HX, Corsair 800D case. Win7 x64 Ultimate.
Heatware
Ajay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:28 PM   #21
Elfear
Diamond Member
 
Elfear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,438
Default

For strictly gaming, the two architectures are very very close according to TPU.




Tahiti has the edge in compute applications unless it's specifically coded for CUDA.
__________________
2600k@4.8GHz 1.40V | Asus WS Revo | Trifire 7970s@1125/170 | 16GB DDR3 | Custom H20
Elfear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:28 PM   #22
SirPauly
Diamond Member
 
SirPauly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,328
Default

I think at this point in time and maturity, GCN may have proved to be a superior architecture based on performance with higher resolutions -- and not really surprising based on the raw specs and potential.

If the subject is efficiency, Kepler makes a very strong case.

AMD/ATI usually are always impressive when it comes to architectures. World class --leaders in many respects -- there are reasons why ATI/AMD and nVidia survived through the years and its based on their immense talents.
SirPauly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:30 PM   #23
boxleitnerb
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,886
Default

Too early to tell. We would have to wait what GK110 brings to the table. To compare architectures with such a discrepancy in raw power and bandwidth makes no sense imo.
boxleitnerb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:32 PM   #24
NIGELG
Senior Member
 
NIGELG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 622
Default

I don't know.I haven't used either.
__________________
Sapphire AMD Radeon 7970 OC
Intel 3570K with Coolermaster EVO CPU Cooler
16GB Corsair VENGEANCE DDR 3 RAM@1600Mhz
Gigabyte Z77X-D3H
1TB Western Digital HD,320GB Seagate HD,Crucial M4
Dell IPS 1080P Monitor.
NIGELG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 03:38 PM   #25
BD231
Diamond Member
 
BD231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moonbogg View Post
Kepler, more perf/watt, more scalable. Also much cheaper (unless your are a consumer).
lol
__________________
2550k @ 4.7ghz
Asus z68 Gene-Z ROG
HD7970Ghz Edition @ 1100/1600
8gb DDR3 @ 2133
BD231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.