|
|
 |
12-06-2012, 12:01 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 718
|
hdmi 1.3 vs hdmi 1.4
Hello, I want to choose a hdmi cable for my gtx 550ti to connect to Dell S2340L.
It's either a oxygenless copper, golden plated one 1.3:
https://www.skytech.lt/04857oem-4wor...-p-129491.html
or
A "premium" (I don't know what it actually means) hdmi cable that is 1.4:
https://www.skytech.lt/ccphdmi46-cab...d-p-70896.html
Is it possible to see a difference in quality or lets say 1fps in games because of the choice if hdmi? For example the very best hdmi cable vs the cheapest one?
Do I really need 1.4 or should I go with that quality 1.3? But then perhaps 1.4 is also faster behind the scenes somehow?
__________________
Intel Pentium G860 | Sapphire HD7790 1Gb Dual-X | MSI B75A-G41 | 2x4Gb 1333 RAM | 1 Tb 7200rpm WD Blue | Enermax Pro82+ 525w | Xonar D1 | S2340L | Edifier Studio 6
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 12:07 PM
|
#2
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,566
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kristijonas
Hello, I want to choose a hdmi cable for my gtx 550ti to connect to Dell S2340L.
It's either a oxygenless copper, golden plated one 1.3:
https://www.skytech.lt/04857oem-4wor...-p-129491.html
or
A "premium" (I don't know what it actually means) hdmi cable that is 1.4:
https://www.skytech.lt/ccphdmi46-cab...d-p-70896.html
Is it possible to see a difference in quality or lets say 1fps in games because of the choice if hdmi? For example the very best hdmi cable vs the cheapest one?
Do I really need 1.4 or should I go with that quality 1.3? But then perhaps 1.4 is also faster behind the scenes somehow?
|
I think a 1.3 version should be just fine for you, per wikipedia, 1.4 adds:
Quote:
|
HDMI 1.4 was released on May 28, 2009, and the first HDMI 1.4 products were available in the second half of 2009.[106][137] HDMI 1.4 increases the maximum resolution to 4K × 2K, i.e. 3840 × 2160p (Quad HD) at 24 Hz/25 Hz/30 Hz or 4096 × 2160p at 24 Hz (which is a resolution used with digital theaters); an HDMI Ethernet Channel (HEC), which allows for a 100 Mbit/s Ethernet connection between the two HDMI connected devices so they can share an Internet connection;[56] and introduces an Audio Return Channel (ARC),[55] 3D Over HDMI, a new Micro HDMI Connector, expanded support for color spaces, with the addition of sYCC601, Adobe RGB and Adobe YCC601; and an Automotive Connection System.[106][138][139][140][141] HDMI 1.4 supports several stereoscopic 3D formats including field alternative (interlaced), frame packing (a full resolution top-bottom format), line alternative full, side-by-side half, side-by-side full, 2D + depth, and 2D + depth + graphics + graphics depth (WOWvx),[103][142][143] with additional top/bottom formats added in version 1.4a . HDMI 1.4 requires that 3D displays support the frame packing 3D format at either 720p50 and 1080p24 or 720p60 and 1080p24.[143] High Speed HDMI 1.3 cables can support all HDMI 1.4 features except for the HDMI Ethernet Channel
|
There is also HDMI 1.4a and b. But most of this stuff is for home theater and for the chips at the ends of the cable, not the cable itself.
__________________
"this is Jim Kiler step away from the window" -Robert Culp as Jim Kiler in Outrage.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 12:12 PM
|
#3
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,566
|
Actually if you read a little further down on the wikipedia page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI_1.4#Version_1.4 assuming you are at 32 bit color depth if you need a resolution above 1920x1200 you need version 1.4, but again that means your video card and monitor are 1.4 compliant.
__________________
"this is Jim Kiler step away from the window" -Robert Culp as Jim Kiler in Outrage.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 04:23 PM
|
#4
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,236
|
According to HDMI.org, cables are no longer supposed to be labeled with specification versions. Only "High-Speed", "High-speed with ethernet", "normal speed", and "normal speed with ethernet".
So as long as it's a high-speed cable, you're good to go. Whether or not your output device or display device supports certain features, is what depends on the spec version number, not the cable.
__________________
Rig(s) not listed, because I change computers, like some people change their socks.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#5
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 16,518
|
There is no physical difference between an HDMI 1.3 and HDMI 1.4 (non Ethernet) cable. They were just tested at a given spec, and the manufacturer may not have gone back and re-tested.
|
|
|
12-06-2012, 09:56 PM
|
#6
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,248
|
HDMI Cables
HDMI Cables should not cost that much. If all you want is a cable long enough to go from your Computer to your monitor 1-6ft, then you can probably find some lightweight 1.4 cables that will work just fine. There are a lot of cable internet sellers. So shop around. Where things might get important is if you want cables that are 25-100 ft long.
I thought it kind of odd that monitors would have only VGA and HDMI. I think technically you can send 2 video sources over one HDMI cable, so for one monitor at 1080p almost any HDMI cable will work fine. I dont know how this figures into the 3D video model?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.
|