Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Peripherals

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2012, 11:32 AM   #1
MBrown
Diamond Member
 
MBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,550
Default Higher than 60Hz Monitors (Higher than 60fps needed?)

I am looking into getting that Asus 144Hz monitor, but I want to know if this is the case. In order to see the benefit of the higher refresh rate, do you need to maintain a fps that is the same as the Monitors refresh rate, or will there be a difference no matter what your fps is?
__________________
i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz | Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo | Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H | 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X | 2x EVGA GTX 780 FTW w/ACX | Antec High Current Gamer 900W PSU | 256GB Samsung 830 series 6Gb/s | 1TB Western Digital Black 6Gb/s | Antec P280 | 27" ASUS PB278Q LCD 1440p @ 60Hz | Logitech Z-2300 | Audio-Technica ATH-M50 | Windows 8.1 Pro x64
MBrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2012, 11:54 AM   #2
SMOGZINN
Diamond Member
 
SMOGZINN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,827
Default

Theoretically a 144Hz monitor should always look better then a 60Hz monitor as it will be able to draw any ready frames faster. Realistically I doubt you could tell the difference if you are not able to maintain a FPS well over 60.
__________________
"The open society, the unrestricted access to knowledge, the unplanned and uninhibited association of men for its furtherance? These are what may make a vast, complex, ever-growing, ever-changing, ever more specialized and expert technological world nevertheless a world of human community." - J. Robert Oppenheimer
SMOGZINN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 04:06 PM   #3
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
 
BTRY B 529th FA BN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,807
Default

i don't think the fps matters if it flickers at 60Hz vs 144Hz, am i wrong?
__________________
Rig1: Xeon X5660 6core 32nm @ 4GHz @ 1.23v, Asrock X58, GTX 670 FTW, Samsung 128Gb 840 Pro, Vertex2 100Gb, Cherry MX Reds, 2009 Seasonic X 650w, Aluminum Full tower - Currently doing gaming and daily duties.
Rig2: i7 970 6core 32nm @ Stock, EVGA 760 Classified,
Nvidia 0db 210, Elpida Hyper CL6.6.6.15, Samsung Evo 120Gb, Vertex LE 100Gb, Cherry MX Blacks, Sidewinder X3, Enermax Revo 950w, Obsidian 800D - On Vacation
BTRY B 529th FA BN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 09:30 AM   #4
Black Octagon
Senior Member
 
Black Octagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: European Union
Posts: 773
Default

You need to actually drive more than 60fps to derive the main benefits from a monitor that runs above 60Hz.

That said, there are some anecdotes on places like 120Hz.net, from people who claim that 60fps@120hz does feel slightly smoother than 60fps@60hz.

In short, don't buy a monitor greater than 60Hz unless you're willing to do what it takes (i.e., sacrifice eye-candy or upgrade your hardware) to actually drive 60-144fps
Black Octagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 09:33 AM   #5
kache
Senior Member
 
kache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Travelling, from Italy
Posts: 486
Default

You need to get more than 60fps.
But you will see the difference even at 80fps, as linustechtips proved.
So I'd say go for it. Worst case scenario you will have to drop graphics options to have higher fps, but it's well worth it.
__________________
Ipsa scientia potestas est
kache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 09:49 AM   #6
Ben90
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Octagon View Post
That said, there are some anecdotes on places like 120Hz.net, from people who claim that 60fps@120hz does feel slightly smoother than 60fps@60hz
I'm not so sure about smoother, but it does pull 0-16ms off the input delay depending on your criteria of measure.
Ben90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 04:03 AM   #7
BrightCandle
Diamond Member
 
BrightCandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,481
Default

60@60 can help to reduce microstutter slightly but really you need lower average frame times to benefit from a higher hz monitor.
__________________
i7 3930k @4.4, 2xMSI GTX 680, 16GB Corsair 2133 RAM, Crucial m4 500GB, Soundblaster Z
Custom watercooled by 2x MCR 320 and 1 MCR 480
Zowie Evo CL EC2, Corsair K70, Asus Rog Swift PG278Q
BrightCandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 04:43 AM   #8
bunnyfubbles
Lifer
 
bunnyfubbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BTRY B 529th FA BN View Post
i don't think the fps matters if it flickers at 60Hz vs 144Hz, am i wrong?
of course it matters, if a screen is refreshing 60 times per second, you won't be able to truly benefit from having frame rates higher than 60fps

not only does a higher frame rate (60fps isn't that high) help with tracking fast moving objects, it improves input response times

I have yet to see a gamer who didn't think their upgrade to 120Hz (or better) mattered, and most simply can't even tolerate 60Hz if they ever had to go back to it.
__________________
i7 3930K @ 4.7GHz + XSPC Raystorm/EX280/D5 | ASUS Sabertooth X79 | EVGA GeForce GTX780 | 4x4GB Samsung Green DDR3 @ 1866 CAS9 1.5v | 2x256GB Samsung 830 RAID-0 | 3 x 1.5TB Hitachi 7K3000 RAID-0 | 2 x 3TB Seagate 7200.14 RAID-0 | Windows 8.1 Pro Update 1 x64 | Creative X-Fi Titanium HD | Seasonic Platinum-1000 | Silverstone FT02B-WRI | BenQ XL2420T | Dell U2711 | Filco Majestouch-2 Tenkeyless Cherry MX Red | Razer Abyssus + Goliathus Speed | Beyerdynamic MMX300 / Astro A40 2013
bunnyfubbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 05:19 AM   #9
Black Octagon
Senior Member
 
Black Octagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: European Union
Posts: 773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bunnyfubbles View Post
of course it matters, if a screen is refreshing 60 times per second, you won't be able to truly benefit from having frame rates higher than 60fps

not only does a higher frame rate (60fps isn't that high) help with tracking fast moving objects, it improves input response times

I have yet to see a gamer who didn't think their upgrade to 120Hz (or better) mattered, and most simply can't even tolerate 60Hz if they ever had to go back to it.
I must agree with this. I moved to 120Hz this year and literally get a headache if gaming at 60@60 now...and I've got poor eyes to boot
__________________
Asrock Extreme3 Z68 | i5-2500k @ 4.6Ghz | 8GB Corsair Vengeance | Sapphire HD7970 @ 1250/1750 | Crucial M4 128GB | CM Hyper Evo 212 | Overlord Tempest X270OC @ 120Hz
Black Octagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.