Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Highly Technical

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2012, 05:31 AM   #1
tommo123
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,127
Default not sure if HT but - going to mars?

this could be political as well i guess.

watching a BBC show (dara o briains science club) and the latest ep is about space. at one point it mentions the only reason man went to the moon was to outdo the russians and that will doesn't exist anymore in the west - but, the chinese might do it in the near future to outdo the us.

could we then be looking at another space race? is it wrong that i'm hoping for that to happen as it would benefit us all no? new tech, science, knowledge.

the other part was that due to the "rocket equation" that a return mission is impractical without a new type of propulsion but a one way mission is doable. are we likely to see people volunteer to go and set up a colony permanently? dismantle the craft and live there? expand as new people arrive?

that i'm not sure about. i mean when people left for "the new world" there wasn't that much of a difference in living standards and people were used to working much harder (manual labour). i can't see that pioneering spirit in the gen pop - maybe in the science circles? a geologist who'd love to study martian soil/rock etc?

-------

also

trying to prevent muscle and bone loss in space. i might be looking at it from the wrong angle but bodybuilders use drugs/steroids/HGH etc to prevent muscle loss while cutting to keep muscle mass - do astronauts to anything similar? i mean finding whatever mechanism is responsible for the deterioration (dystrophy?) and preventing it would be better than the whole space treadmill thing surely?

Last edited by tommo123; 11-28-2012 at 05:36 AM.
tommo123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 06:31 PM   #2
jibberegg
Member
 
jibberegg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 129
Default To Mars!

The race to the moon was indeed highly political. Spending a similar amount of GDP is not currently feasible, but that can change in the future. You only had to listen to some of the themes from the recent Presidential Elections to see that China looms large on the political landscape.

As far as propulsion goes, landing on Mars and then returning is indeed a tall order with current rocket tech. Creating extraterrestrial fuel sources (e.g. on the moon, or boosting it up to an orbiting refuelling rig) would help due to the advantage of not having the rocket drag it up the gravity well of Earth. Cost is obviously the reason this hasn't happened yet. Political will or much more advanced technology are both solutions, but neither are happening in the next 5-10years.

As far as muscle goes on space journeys; using weights in a weightless environment is counter-productive. What you can do instead is use resistance training. Imagine a thick rubber band and pulling that apart. This is currently in use on space station.

Hope this helps!
Sources:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34645.pdf
http://www.space.com/12560-nasa-spac...contracts.html
http://www.bsu.edu/news/article/0,13...-24016,00.html
__________________
Core i7 3770K @ 4.3GHz
HD7970 w. Accelero Xtreme 7970 cooler
8GB 1.35v Corsair Vengeance 1333MHz (9-9-9-24)
MSI Z77A-G45
256GB Samsung 840 Pro
Antec P280
jibberegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 06:50 PM   #3
PandaBear
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,360
Default

Political indeed, and unless we are at war with China I don't see a reason to outdo them even if they go to Mars on their dime.

Now about one way trip, I'd imagine a lot of older people will want to go there even if they were to stay there forever afterward. And I'd imagine by impossible to do round trip that just means we need to send many unmanned trips there to load up enough fuel for a return trip. Maybe we need 10 fuel rockets and 1 return vehicle cargo rocket, then 1 single rocket for the destination bound human vehicle.

If you do not need to worry about doing it all in one shot, you open up a lot of opportunity for efficiency gain.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

Happy with M since 2001

My Heat
PandaBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 10:38 AM   #4
tommo123
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,127
Default

if they wen't to mars, wouldn't the advancements put them ahead of the US in some ways? i mean, they could put people on there (possibly not of their free will - eek) if needs be.

the chinese are spending a metric f-ton of money building ghost cities to show off to the world. if they spent that money instead on building an actual moon base and use that as a launch pad to go to the moon they would own the worlds attention for aaaages.

side note - 3D printers, the show i watched said they'd be userful on the moon as in theory you could use the soil as the "toner" or whatever the powder in those things is called.

i really wan't another 60's era. not the cold war, but that huge competitive spirit between superpowers that launch us all forward technologically like the space race did. if that happened, couldn't we have people living in domes on mars within a century? total recall style?
tommo123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012, 02:00 PM   #5
rollins
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Default

Personally I wish NASA would focus less on Mars and more on the other planets and moons in our solar system. Four rovers have been to Mars and whilst it's great to see Mars in high definition and learn more about it there's moons and planets that we know hardly anything about.
rollins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012, 04:01 AM   #6
Agent11
Diamond Member
 
Agent11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,535
Default

We should be going to vesta.
__________________
-11
Agent11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2012, 03:05 PM   #7
JTsyo
Diamond Member
 
JTsyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,154
Default

Suicide missions to Mars would not be good PR for the space program. I don't see NASA sending anyone there they can't bring back with a high level of confidence.

There isn't much to gain by sending people over to Mars other than the PR. It's better to hold off until we have the proper technology to do it. From what I've seen of China's tech, they are good at catching up but when is the last time you seen them actually surpass other nations in technology? With a space program there isn't much margin for error and failure is very public.
JTsyo is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.