Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Consumer Electronics > Digital and Video Cameras

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2012, 03:25 PM   #1
DVad3r
Diamond Member
 
DVad3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,301
Question What DSLR camera to get? 600 $ budget

Hey guys,

What is a good starter DSLR camera or kit? Max budget $ 600.

Costco here has a Canon Rebel T3 kit for 599 + tax. Any good?

Should I look at Sony or Nikon options as well?

Thanks,
__________________
I find your lack of faith disturbing...
2001 Lexus ES 300
2013 BMW F800GS
2009 Harley Davidson Night Rod Special (SOLD)
DVad3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 05:29 PM   #2
CuriousMike
Golden Member
 
CuriousMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area,Ca
Posts: 1,405
Default

I'm a Nikon guy so here's my bias.
Consider refurb

For $429, this is a helluva deal
http://www.adorama.com/INKD5100KR.html
__________________
Acer C720 Chromebook

CuriousMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 06:51 PM   #3
blastingcap
Diamond Member
 
blastingcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,825
Default

I've used pretty much every brand of camera out there and would recommend a used Nikon D5100 as an excellent camera, with the 18-55 kit lens. Canon has been asleep at the wheel for the last few years, having almost no hardware upgrades to their sensor tech, whereas Sony has been making significant improvements and using the sensors in their own cameras as well as selling them to Nikon, Pentax, Olympus, and even to some extent Panasonic. Canon vs. Sony sensors are no contest: Sony wins.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox View Post
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
Main: 3570K + R9 290 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS
blastingcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 09:20 PM   #4
nusyo
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 97
Default

In the entry DSLR market it comes down to user preference (Nikon, Canon etc)

As much as I love Costco deals, I would still try to get a Canon T3i as opose to T3 (the i represents some real nice upgrades) .
__________________
.:: ::.
nusyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 01:08 PM   #5
artvscommerce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 991
Default

i really love the T3i + magic lantern firmware.
artvscommerce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 03:45 PM   #6
kbp
Senior Member
 
kbp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Northern Lower Peninsula
Posts: 568
Default

I've got a Nikon D90 and a 18-105 for sale. Just over 3000 shots on it (which is very low). PM me if interested.
__________________

kbp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 04:25 PM   #7
JohnnyRebel
Senior Member
 
JohnnyRebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 743
Default

Nikon D5100 refurb with 18-55 VR lens $459.00
http://www.adorama.com/INKD5100KR.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d5100.htm

Nikon D3100 refurb with 18-55 VR lens $367.95
http://www.adorama.com/INKD3100KR.html
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3100.htm

Add to either kit:

Nikon 55-200 VR lens for $134.00
http://www.adorama.com/NK55200VRR.html
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htm

Add to the D3100 kit:

Nikon SB-400 external flash for $99.95
http://www.adorama.com/NKSB400AFR.html
http://kenrockwell.com/nikon/sb400.htm

Last edited by JohnnyRebel; 11-18-2012 at 04:35 PM.
JohnnyRebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 04:32 PM   #8
Kanalua
Diamond Member
 
Kanalua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,860
Default

Canon T3i with 18-55mm kit lens - $599 brand new:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Proc...dp/B004J3V90Y/

This is great deal. Takes pretty good video, as well. Install MagicLantern and you've got quite a powerful DSLR video rig.

Save up money at get the versatile 50 mm F/1.8 "Nifty-fifty": http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8.../dp/B00007E7JU

Pick up a used 55-250 mm telephoto for ~$150: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listi...seller=&sr=1-1
__________________
| kiapolo.com (blog) | Gear List | Flickr | YouTube | 2012 Project 366 | Hōkūle`a (My 24 week micro-preemie baby girl) |

Last edited by Kanalua; 11-18-2012 at 04:37 PM.
Kanalua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 08:05 PM   #9
iGas
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,099
Default

IMHO, the most important thing is how comfortable the camera in your hand... Any Canikon, Sony, Olympus, or Pentax that came out in the last couple of years till now will do.
iGas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:32 PM   #10
happysmiles
Senior Member
 
happysmiles's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 344
Default

Sony NEX-5N.

it's been on big discount as of late and from the photos I've seen, it's absolutely worth it, it's size/weight is a definite bonus.

I have a Canon 550D and I've extensively photographed with both and yeah if I had a choice I'd choose the Sony any day.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Guaraguao View Post
I do not give a happysmiles.
happysmiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 03:49 PM   #11
bigrash
Lifer
 
bigrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Flushing, NY
Posts: 17,439
Default

Go with the Canon Canon T3i.
bigrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 09:49 PM   #12
alexruiz
Platinum Member
 
alexruiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SE Michigan, USA // EdoMex, MEXICO
Posts: 2,248
Default

If you truly care about getting good pictures, Pentax K30 :p
alexruiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 11:23 PM   #13
gevorg
Diamond Member
 
gevorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,724
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by happysmiles View Post
Sony NEX-5N.

it's been on big discount as of late and from the photos I've seen, it's absolutely worth it, it's size/weight is a definite bonus.

I have a Canon 550D and I've extensively photographed with both and yeah if I had a choice I'd choose the Sony any day.
Another vote for NEX-5N w/kit lens for $430-500. Gives many DSLRs a run for their money. Its build-in HDR mode is amazing for a newbie. Compare here to Canon T4i, Nikon D5100, Sony A57, etc:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonynex5n/13
gevorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 01:19 PM   #14
artvscommerce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 991
Default

I LOVE my nex 5n, but if you don't mind carrying around the extra size and weight, there are some serious advantages to the T3i. The viewfinder is really nice to have. Same with the hot shoe and the ability to run magic lantern. I think the Nex 5N is just as capable, but the lenses cost more and there are less options available, it can overheat after taking videos over 20 minutes, and the optional viewfinder is VERY expensive.
artvscommerce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 03:23 PM   #15
SithSolo1
Diamond Member
 
SithSolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,211
Default

I'm kinda disappointed I went the Pentax route, glass is so expensive.
__________________
Ncase M1|i7-4770k|16GB ram|128GB msata+128GB ssd|Reference R9 290|ST45SF-G|U2412m
Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=3992
SithSolo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 03:29 PM   #16
CuriousMike
Golden Member
 
CuriousMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay Area,Ca
Posts: 1,405
Default

Tell me the system where glass is unexpensive.

My friend has the Nex 5 and loves it...but Sony has some very expensive glass.
__________________
Acer C720 Chromebook

CuriousMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 04:30 PM   #17
gevorg
Diamond Member
 
gevorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,724
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuriousMike View Post
but Sony has some very expensive glass.
True for most Sony lens, but there are some bargains like the Sigma E-Mount 30mm f/2.8.

EDIT: Sigma E-Mount is at $50 off on Amazon & B&H Photo!

Last edited by gevorg; 11-23-2012 at 03:22 PM.
gevorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2012, 04:35 PM   #18
blastingcap
Diamond Member
 
blastingcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,825
Default

Sony has jack for glass, that's why I'm still waiting. Oh sure, if you actually want the usual kit zooms or like one or two Sigma primes, you're set. But they are charging a fortune for their wideangle zoom, their 50mm OSS is nice but the price is way more than rivals' stuff, and OSS does not help you if the subject is moving around (like a kid running around) anyway. The Zeiss 24 is way the hell overpriced. The big 18-200 kinda defeats the purpose of going small and presents balancing issues with some NEX bodies. If you are willing to live with that, fine, but I looked at their lens roadmap and they will have no longer-focal-length zooms, bright telephoto, or bright midrange zooms, which is completely f***ing unacceptable to me. Don't give us a freaking macro when we can get macro filters or extension tubes. Give us a NEX 17-50mm OSS f/2.8, a NEX 70-200mm OSS f/2.8, etc. Since those kinds of lenses are not on the roadmap, they have lost customers like me.

I'm sticking to my existing Nikon glass in the meantime and will probably get a RX100 or Nikon V1 to supplement it.

CaNikon glass is way the hell more affordable than Sony's stuff, btw. Nikon examples: 35mm DX f/1.8 is sharp and cheap, at less than $180 used. Tamron 17-50 can be had for under $300 used; if you need stabilization then I can vouch for the Sigma 17-50 OS which is a great lens. You can get 18-300/70-300 lenses or similar from several lensmakers. You can get 70-200 f/2.8 glass as well. A good but cheap wideangle like the Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 costs way less than the Sony NEX wideangle and you basically give up a little bit of aperture, or none at all if you shoot at f/8 or smaller (which most people do with their wideangles). There still is no NEX equivalent of the Tamron 11-18 f/2.8 DX. Etc.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoFox View Post
We had to suffer polygonal boobs for a decade because of selfish corporate reasons.
Main: 3570K + R9 290 + 16GB 1866 + AsRock Extreme4 Z77 + Eyefinity 5760x1080 eIPS

Last edited by blastingcap; 11-20-2012 at 04:37 PM.
blastingcap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 09:05 PM   #19
iGas
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,099
Default

Canikon have great glass for relatively lower price than the rest of the competitors. IMHO, Canon have a slight lead on the quick focusing motor, and telephotos are very sharp at slightly lower price than Nikon. Nikon have the leg up on wide angles and macros.

That said, Samyang 14mm is a great inexpensive manual focusing lens (learn hyper focus and you will not need autofocus) that is available for pretty much all body mounts.
iGas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2012, 10:11 PM   #20
Smoove910
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nampa, Idaho
Posts: 1,094
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SithSolo1 View Post
I'm kinda disappointed I went the Pentax route, glass is so expensive.
The glass may be expensive, but the beauty is you can take your pick of K-mount lenses through the past 30 years...

My vote = Pentax... my K7 has been great, but recent reviews has shown the K-5II to beat the image quality of ANY Canon body. Bold statement there!

http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pen...s-dxomark.html
__________________
Mobo: Biostar TA880GU3+ uATX
Proc: AMD Phenom II 960T unlocked/6 cores @ 3.5ghz
Ram: (4) 4gb GSkill 1600mhz (16gb total)
HDDs: (2) 640GB WD AAKS, (1) 750GB Seagate Ext
Vid: Sapphire 6870 1gb DDR5 1000mhz core, 1100 mhz mem
Camera: Pentax K5, I'm not a Canikon fanboy.
Smoove910 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2012, 04:21 AM   #21
Muse
Lifer
 
Muse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Under the rainbow over Berkeley
Posts: 14,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SithSolo1 View Post
I'm kinda disappointed I went the Pentax route, glass is so expensive.
The say Pentax glass is cheaper than canikon, especially because the shake reduction is in the body, not the lenses.
__________________
Quotations on happiness!

Last edited by Muse; 11-22-2012 at 04:24 AM.
Muse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 11:44 AM   #22
Uppsala9496
Diamond Member
 
Uppsala9496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sadhouse on Madison
Posts: 4,535
Default

Going to go with the Sony Nex-5N for my wife. B&H has it for $478 with a $50 gift card.
__________________
blank
Uppsala9496 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 03:06 PM   #23
alexruiz
Platinum Member
 
alexruiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SE Michigan, USA // EdoMex, MEXICO
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SithSolo1 View Post
I'm kinda disappointed I went the Pentax route, glass is so expensive.
Canon / Nikon are cheaper on the cheap glass (50mm f1.8 for example) but once you get onto better lenses, they are more expensive. Find an equivalent to the Pentax limited primes in image and build quality for close to their price. Yes, if you want a cheap prime <$200, Pentax is more expensive, but once you start going up thye are not.
alexruiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 03:09 PM   #24
alexruiz
Platinum Member
 
alexruiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SE Michigan, USA // EdoMex, MEXICO
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gevorg View Post
Another vote for NEX-5N w/kit lens for $430-500. Gives many DSLRs a run for their money. Its build-in HDR mode is amazing for a newbie. Compare here to Canon T4i, Nikon D5100, Sony A57, etc:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonynex5n/13
I suggested the Pentax K30, and after seeing that comparison to the NEX5, I have to admit the NEX5 is right there with it for image quality
The NEX5 does better at 6400, the K30 does better at 3200. The NEX5 is not a bad suggestion.

Last edited by alexruiz; 11-23-2012 at 03:16 PM.
alexruiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2012, 09:44 PM   #25
lykaon78
Golden Member
 
lykaon78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,027
Default

I'm a newb. I took 1500+ pictures on a Disney vacation with my Sony Nex-5 with the majority on the auto mode and I couldn't be happier with the results. With the pancake lens the camera fit in cargo pants pockets.

In low lighting situations I'd switch to a more manual mode and snap some great shots or just use their anti-motion blur mode that snaps three consecutive photos and blends them in order to reduce blur. I'd highly recommend the Sony Nex-5 line for anyone that looking for flexibility beyond and P&S camera but not wanting to fully dive into the DLSR pool.
lykaon78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.