Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > Video Cards and Graphics

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2012, 10:46 AM   #1
raghu78
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,577
Default Hardocp Fall 2012 GPU and Driver Comparison Roundup

hardocp has a catalyst 12.11 beta vs detonator 310.33 beta comparison

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/...ison_roundup/3

HD 7970 Ghz is the fastest single GPU without any contention. the GTX 660 Ti is demolished by the HD 7950 Boost . HD 7870 almost matches GTX 660 Ti. Nvidia though must be readying the GK110 based Nvidia GTX 780 to emphatically take back the single GPU crown.

Nvidia releases 310.54 beta. But comparisons are shown against 306.89 whql. so its unclear whats the improvement from 310.33 beta and is it enough to put GTX 680 on competitive footing with HD 7970 Ghz.

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/art...ivers-released

Last edited by raghu78; 11-12-2012 at 11:39 AM.
raghu78 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:53 AM   #2
aaksheytalwar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,137
Default

Thanks for sharing.
__________________
3770k @ 4.3 with H100i, Asus Z77 Deluxe, Samsung 30nm 4x4gb ddr3 @ 1866 9-9-9-28 1T, MSI R9 290 Gaming 4G, Coolermaster Silent Pro Hybrid 1300 watts, Crucial M4 512gb, 3x Seagate 7200.14 3TB each
aaksheytalwar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:57 AM   #3
Shmee
Moderator
Memory and Storage
Video Cards and Graphics
 
Shmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cali
Posts: 2,213
Default

Nothing real new, IMO, especially when Ocing is accounted for.
__________________
Anandtech Moderator
4930k @ 4.2 GHz under corsair H100i
R9 290 crossfire 2x Sapphire Tri X | Seasonic 1250 Gold
16GB Corsair Vengeance on Gigabyte X79-UP4
HP ZR30W | Haf X | Logitech G110 + G500
Seagate 600 + Crucial M4 + WD black 1TB
Shmee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:00 AM   #4
aaksheytalwar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,137
Default

Important findings:
There are instances where the difference between a 670 and 680 are 15-25% hint: look at min fps. Also, both oc so that diff is always maintained.

Second, the 7970 ghz is easily 20-30%+ faster than a 7950 boost. And 7970s oc higher as well. So rest assured an oced 7970 will be about 15-20% faster than an oced 7950 in times when it really counts, ESP min fps.
__________________
3770k @ 4.3 with H100i, Asus Z77 Deluxe, Samsung 30nm 4x4gb ddr3 @ 1866 9-9-9-28 1T, MSI R9 290 Gaming 4G, Coolermaster Silent Pro Hybrid 1300 watts, Crucial M4 512gb, 3x Seagate 7200.14 3TB each
aaksheytalwar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:01 AM   #5
Remobz
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,819
Default

Thanks as well.
Remobz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:05 AM   #6
toyota
Lifer
 
toyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: my chair
Posts: 12,492
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaksheytalwar View Post
Important findings:
There are instances where the difference between a 670 and 680 are 15-25% hint: look at min fps. Also, both oc so that diff is always maintained.

Second, the 7970 ghz is easily 20-30%+ faster than a 7950 boost. And 7970s oc higher as well. So rest assured an oced 7970 will be about 15-20% faster than an oced 7950 in times when it really counts, ESP min fps.
um the 670 is clocked much lower so the difference is NOT maintained when both the 670 and 680 are oced. there typically less than a 5% overall difference between a 670 and 680 at the same clocks and a 680 has no better chance of overclocking any further than a 670 either.
__________________
Win 8.1 64 bit | 4770k@4.4 | Asus Z87 Pro | Asus reference GTX 980 | G.SKILL Ares 16GB DDR3 2133 | Seagate SSHD 2TB | Corsair 500R | Corsair TX650 V2 | Sound Blaster Zx | Gateway 23inch 1920x1080 IPS
toyota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:20 AM   #7
raghu78
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaksheytalwar View Post
Important findings:
There are instances where the difference between a 670 and 680 are 15-25% hint: look at min fps. Also, both oc so that diff is always maintained.

Second, the 7970 ghz is easily 20-30%+ faster than a 7950 boost. And 7970s oc higher as well. So rest assured an oced 7970 will be about 15-20% faster than an oced 7950 in times when it really counts, ESP min fps.
the clock difference between HD 7950 Boost and HD 7970 Ghz is more than the clock difference between GTX 680 and GTX 670. the HD 7950 boost is not running at 925 Mhz consistently at stock but closer to 850 Mhz . But if you max out power control to +20% it will run at 925 Mhz consistently and the gap with HD 7970 Ghz will reduce. At the same clocks HD 7950 is 3 - 5% slower than HD 7970. this has been proven by many users on ocn and even these forums.

From these benchmarks its clear that
HD 7970 (1.2 Ghz) = HD 7950(1.25 Ghz) > GTX 680(1.35 Ghz)
raghu78 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:29 AM   #8
chimaxi83
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,614
Default

Good to see AMD in a definitive overall lead
__________________
Mine: 3770K - MSI Z77 MPower - Gigabyte 290 CF - 16GB Samsung - M4 256GB/Caviar Black 1TB - XFX Core Pro 1050W - NZXT Switch 810 - Auria IPS 27" 2560x1440 - Custom loop
Kiddo: 3770K - MSI Z77A-G43 - 7870 Tahiti LE - 8GB Samsung - M4 64GB/Caviar Black 1TB - Antec Neo Eco 620W - HAF 922
chimaxi83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:14 PM   #9
aaksheytalwar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,137
Default

The bechmarks marks members have done are avg fps not min fps. Avg fps of the better card is just 5-10% higher. But min fps are 10-20% higher assuming both are oced to their respective max.
__________________
3770k @ 4.3 with H100i, Asus Z77 Deluxe, Samsung 30nm 4x4gb ddr3 @ 1866 9-9-9-28 1T, MSI R9 290 Gaming 4G, Coolermaster Silent Pro Hybrid 1300 watts, Crucial M4 512gb, 3x Seagate 7200.14 3TB each
aaksheytalwar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:23 PM   #10
Skurge
Diamond Member
 
Skurge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Namibia
Posts: 4,941
Default

Pretty embarrassing for nV here, although I wouldn't be so clear with a wider range of games, but this pretty much shows how overprices Nv's top 3 cards are. Well actually seeing how poorly the 650/640 perform. It's seems only the 650Ti and the 660 aren't terribly priced.
__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K |MSI Z97-Gaming 5|32GB DDR3-1600|Gigabyte R9 290 Windforce CF [stock]|Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB|Corsair AX860 PSU|Corsair 750D|Windows 8.1 Pro|Samsung U28D590D|Logitech G27 Racing Wheel|Nexus 5 32GB
Skurge is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:27 PM   #11
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaksheytalwar View Post
The bechmarks marks members have done are avg fps not min fps. Avg fps of the better card is just 5-10% higher. But min fps are 10-20% higher assuming both are oced to their respective max.
Sorry, but first, you're wrong, and second HardOCP's methodology is highly questionable. The 680 only beats the 670 by more than 10% in minimums in two tests (BF3 MP and W2), and even then, the results of the 660Ti, which are either equal to or greater than the 670 in a majority of games, show that the testing was flawed. Furthermore, the average 670 and 680 both pick up about 150Mhz in boost when overclocked, so the score is even there.

Battlefield SP Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 43
GTX670 Min: 44
GTX660Ti Min: 36

Battlefield MP Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 46
GTX670 Min: 38
GTX660Ti Min: 37

Sleeping Dogs Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 25
GTX670 Min: 23
GTX660Ti Min: 21

Max Payne 3 Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 16
GTX670 Min: 15
GTX660Ti Min: 22

Witcher 2 Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 19
GTX670 Min: 14
GTX660Ti Min: 18


By the way, the most important takeaway I see in this entire test is the revival of the HD7870. I am so amused by everyone talking about how everyone with a $200 budget should "stretch" to buy the 7950, when even the "boost" model is only about 15% faster than the much cheaper 7870. And of course, the 660Ti should be discontinued.
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
How's your video card compare? See TBG's Video Card Rankings!

Last edited by Termie; 11-12-2012 at 12:30 PM.
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:41 PM   #12
aaksheytalwar
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,137
Default

Hardocp uses different settings for different cards. Thus the 660ti / 7950 boost seem faster than they really are.

And given the limited number of tests, 2 out of 5 for intensive games is like 40%. I am not saying it would be in 40% games but at least a dozen games among the 100+ releases out there.
__________________
3770k @ 4.3 with H100i, Asus Z77 Deluxe, Samsung 30nm 4x4gb ddr3 @ 1866 9-9-9-28 1T, MSI R9 290 Gaming 4G, Coolermaster Silent Pro Hybrid 1300 watts, Crucial M4 512gb, 3x Seagate 7200.14 3TB each
aaksheytalwar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:51 PM   #13
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaksheytalwar View Post
Hardocp uses different settings for different cards. Thus the 660ti / 7950 boost seem faster than they really are.

And given the limited number of tests, 2 out of 5 for intensive games is like 40%. I am not saying it would be in 40% games but at least a dozen games among the 100+ releases out there.
I quoted apples-to-apples for that reason. The settings are the same, the results are inconsistent at best.
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
How's your video card compare? See TBG's Video Card Rankings!
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:52 PM   #14
raghu78
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Termie View Post
HardOCP's methodology is highly questionable. The 680 only beats the 670 by more than 10% in minimums in two tests (BF3 MP and W2), and even then, the results of the 660Ti, which are either equal to or greater than the 670 in a majority of games, show that the testing was flawed. Furthermore, the average 670 and 680 both pick up about 150Mhz in boost when overclocked, so the score is even there.

Battlefield SP Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 43
GTX670 Min: 44
GTX660Ti Min: 36

Battlefield MP Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 46
GTX670 Min: 38
GTX660Ti Min: 37

Sleeping Dogs Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 25
GTX670 Min: 23
GTX660Ti Min: 21

Max Payne 3 Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 16
GTX670 Min: 15
GTX660Ti Min: 22

Witcher 2 Apples-to-Apples:
GTX680 Min: 19
GTX670 Min: 14
GTX660Ti Min: 18

By the way, the most important takeaway I see in this entire test is the revival of the HD7870. I am so amused by everyone talking about how everyone with a $200 budget should "stretch" to buy the 7950, when even the "boost" model is only about 15% faster than the much cheaper 7870. And of course, the 660Ti should be discontinued.
Please read carefully. in Max Payne 3 the apples to apples comparison of HD 7970 Ghz, GTX 680 and GTX 670 are at 1920 x 1080 8x MSAA while the HD 7950 boost, GTX 660 Ti and HD 7870 use 1920 x 1080 4x MSAA. In Witcher 2 the apples to apples settings comparison is not clear. i have posted a question in hardocp forums if the 2 sets of cards are using same settings or different settings in Witcher 2.

also when overclocked HD 7950 gains more from overclocking than HD 7870. the average HD 7950 overclock of 1.15 Ghz would be 25 - 30% faster than HD 7870 (1.25 Ghz). the price difference is also around 25%. but perf never increases linearly with price when you go up the product stack. so there is no doubt that HD 7950 is a better buy.
raghu78 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 12:58 PM   #15
RussianSensation
Elite Member
 
RussianSensation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 14,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skurge View Post
Pretty embarrassing for nV here, although I wouldn't be so clear with a wider range of games, but this pretty much shows how overprices Nv's top 3 cards are.
Legion Hardware has a review with Cats 12.11 vs. 310.33 Betas. HD7950 Boost and HD7970 Ghz edition are clear price/performance winners.

HD7970 Ghz wins in 10 games, ties in 2 games (trade blows depending on resolution) and loses in 2 games against GTX680:
http://www.legionhardware.com/articl...t_clock,4.html

GTX680 is now even slower in BF3:




Good to see HardOCP finally recognize that HD7950 is far superior to 660Ti and has been from the day 660Ti was released. With Sapphire HD7950 with 3 games going for $280, I can't even imagine buying a GTX660Ti in the US.

I find it most ironic that so many of us agreed that HD7000 series was overpriced until price drops started to trickle in May-June time-frame but even now many people still do not want to admit that GTX600 series has been overpriced since June. Not that any of this matters since we know people will still buy NV even if AMD cards cost less, overclocker better and/or are faster for the same price and come with a bunch of free games. JHH has mastered the marketing / brand value game.
__________________
i5 2500k | Asus P8P67 Rev.3 | Sapphire Dual-X HD7970 1150/1800 1.174V CFX | G.Skill Sniper 8GB DDR3-1600 1.5V
SeaSonic Platinum 1000W | OCZ Vertex 3 120GB + HITACHI 7K1000.B 1TB | Windows 7
Westinghouse 37" 1080P | X-Fi Platinum | Logitech Z5300E 5.1

Last edited by RussianSensation; 11-12-2012 at 01:09 PM.
RussianSensation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 01:36 PM   #16
raghu78
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RussianSensation View Post
Legion Hardware has a review with Cats 12.11 vs. 310.33 Betas. HD7950 Boost and HD7970 Ghz edition are clear price/performance winners.

HD7970 Ghz wins in 10 games, ties in 2 games (trade blows depending on resolution) and loses in 2 games against GTX680:
http://www.legionhardware.com/articl...t_clock,4.html

GTX680 is now even slower in BF3:

Good to see HardOCP finally recognize that HD7950 is far superior to 660Ti and has been from the day 660Ti was released. With Sapphire HD7950 with 3 games going for $280, I can't even imagine buying a GTX660Ti in the US.

I find it most ironic that so many of us agreed that HD7000 series was overpriced until price drops started to trickle in May-June time-frame but even now many people still do not want to admit that GTX600 series has been overpriced since June. Not that any of this matters since we know people will still buy NV even if AMD cards cost less, overclocker better and/or are faster for the same price and come with a bunch of free games. JHH has mastered the marketing / brand value game.
AMD has to improve how the market perceives their products. AMD's marketing and product promotion is nowhere near Nvidia's. They have to match Nvidia in terms of driver robustness which I feel they are yet to achieve. Also launch day performance and stability for the latest AAA titles needs to improve, especially for Crossfire. After 12.11 Nvidia's performance gap has widened considerably. but looks like 310.54 beta seems to be giving a nice performance boost in quite a few games, with BF3 benefiting significantly. the competition is good for the consumer.
raghu78 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.