Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-12-2012, 06:25 AM   #26
feralkid
Diamond Member
 
feralkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Live long and bite me.
Posts: 9,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
How about when midterm elections get here in 2014 and Republicans bolster their grip on the House and add votes in the Senate.
It sure seems like it's going that way, based on recent polling.






feralkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 06:26 AM   #27
nehalem256
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEDIYoda View Post
The Republicans need none of the above.
With any or all of the above they will never ever again have a sitting republican in the White House.

The Republicans need several things to happen.....

They need to correct their stand on immigration -- the hispanic vote is very important....
They need to correct their stand on the abortion issue.....single women are a formidable block of voters...
They need to change their stance on the Gay marriage issue and allow it to happen..again the Gay/Lesbian vote is also important....

They don`t even need to correct their stand on fiscal issues...just the above ands they could have won.

Finally the Republican party needs to distance itself from the influences of the "Christain right"....
The Republican Party is not opposed to immigration. It is opposed to illegal immigration. It is pretty sad that you are arguing that the Republican Party does to embrace law breaking to win votes.

They have no need to change their stance on abortion. They simply need to ban anyone from the party who utters the word rape. Voters for whom abortion rights is super important are not going to vote Republican just because the Republicans flip/flop on abortion.

I do not think that the gay/lesbian vote is big enough to be important.
nehalem256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 06:27 AM   #28
Lonbjerg
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 4,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feralkid View Post
It sure seems like it's going that way, based on recent polling.







Don't even joke about it.
Think about it.
If the repulicans gets a spaking next time...just imagine the whining from FOX "news"...it's will be LOUD...almost to loud
Lonbjerg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 06:57 AM   #29
WhipperSnapper
Lifer
 
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techs View Post
I believe Rick Santorum will be the Republican nominee in 2016
I sure hope so!
WhipperSnapper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 06:59 AM   #30
quest55720
Golden Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nehalem256 View Post
The Republican Party is not opposed to immigration. It is opposed to illegal immigration. It is pretty sad that you are arguing that the Republican Party does to embrace law breaking to win votes.

They have no need to change their stance on abortion. They simply need to ban anyone from the party who utters the word rape. Voters for whom abortion rights is super important are not going to vote Republican just because the Republicans flip/flop on abortion.

I do not think that the gay/lesbian vote is big enough to be important.
They need to go back to the old stance on abortion with the exceptions. When you run candidates who are against all abortions rape will come up. Because that candidate will have to justify their no exception stance since it is not main steam. It is just an easy target the democrats can use.


It is time to drop the anti gay marriage the public has changed their opinions on this issue. The anti gay marriage people got their asses handed to them going 0-4 despite a huge spending advantage. You lose not only the gay/lesbian vote but those who think the government has no business dictating what people can do in their bedroom with a consenting adult. You know real small government conservatives.

On immigration I don't want the GOP to cave on it. Just caving on it won't get them any votes from the Latino community. I am for reform if the boarders are secure first so we never have to deal with it again. Take the returning soldiers from the wars and station some of them on the boarder and secure boarder.
__________________
Drill baby, Drill!!!
quest55720 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 07:51 AM   #31
DrPizza
Administrator
Elite Member
Goat Whisperer
 
DrPizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 43,101
Default

I disagree with the OP. Re: we're coming out of the largest recession since the Great Depression. Look what happened to the President who was around when we got out of the Depression - hint: he's the only President elected to 3 terms. (Not that I'm not saying that there aren't huge differences between these two eras.)

Now, regardless of who was elected last week, unemployment is going to go down. We're still seeing signs of a slow recovery - there are two directions we can go - recovery, or back into a recession. It looks like recovery. 3 1/2 years from now, people will be saying, "wow, I didn't think they would work, but Obama's policies got us back on the right path" when in reality, we'll never know for certain whose policies would have done better for us.
__________________
Fainting Goats
DrPizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:02 AM   #32
nehalem256
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPizza View Post
Now, regardless of who was elected last week, unemployment is going to go down. We're still seeing signs of a slow recovery - there are two directions we can go - recovery, or back into a recession. It looks like recovery. 3 1/2 years from now, people will be saying, "wow, I didn't think they would work, but Obama's policies got us back on the right path" when in reality, we'll never know for certain whose policies would have done better for us.
This is a fairly likely scenario.

Where the Republicans screwed up was continuing their "no compromise" plan after retaking the House in 2010.

If they had instead dropped their obsession with tax cuts for the rich they could gotten probably 90% of their economic agenda passed. And looked much more populist at the same time.

Since jobs have grown every month since Republicans retook the house, they could point to that as an accomplishment of the awesome "new" Republican Party. I believe that people would also have been much more willing to vote for a constructive party than an obstructionist party. Sure, maybe it would have still given Obama a 2nd term. But between that and shutting up about rape the Republicans would have probably retaken the Senate, gained in the house, and been able to bully Obama into almost a Republican puppet. As well as giving them a strong base for retaking the presidency in 2016.

As it is now, assuming the economy continues to improve, Democrats will be able to claim they are the ones responsible for it.
nehalem256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:10 AM   #33
EagleKeeper
Discussion Club Moderator
Elite Member
 
EagleKeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bumps west of Denver
Posts: 42,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JEDIYoda View Post
doesn`t matter who is right,,,if the Republicans do not change the Democrats will again own the White House...that is a fact!!
Realize that the Dems have not had multiple administrations elected back to back since FDR (JFK/LBJ counted as one). That last for the Repub was Reagan/Bush.

Voters do mot seem to like administration inheritance. Is it because the administration strays from what was expected or the appointee is not of quality needed.

VPS nor anointed successors need not apply with respect to either party
__________________
F15 Air Superiority Fighter - Never has one been lost in aerial combat (104 kills)
EagleKeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:15 AM   #34
Agent11
Diamond Member
 
Agent11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Vega View Post
Obama's second term will be bad for Dems and it's not even his fault - and here's why.

The GOP failed because it was too extreme to the right on social issues. People love the financial stuff and the business stuff but can't get past the creepy religious stuff and some perceived and some real racial issues.

So what is the GOP going to do now? Fix it, of course. They are going to back off on social issues and adopt a more Libertarian stance meanwhile focusing on business and financial conservatism - things people care deeply about.

Meanwhile, the Democrats will not drop ANY of their extremest views. What you're going to get in 2016 is a GOP candidate which will pull in all the base Republican voters - that's the 59 million people who voted for Romney, all the independent voters and all the centrist Democrats, around 20 million people. The Democrats however, will still be holding on to their extremist views. It will be the same thing which just happened to the GOP except for the Democrats.



<---- Registered Libertarian, voted for Gary Johnson
I would be overjoyed if they did react this way, I am skeptical though...
__________________
-11
Agent11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:22 AM   #35
nehalem256
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12,975
Default

I think it is really simple. For the Republican's to gain they need to be seen as offering something constructive to voters instead of just not-Obama.
nehalem256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:22 AM   #36
Nemesis 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPizza View Post
I disagree with the OP. Re: we're coming out of the largest recession since the Great Depression. Look what happened to the President who was around when we got out of the Depression - hint: he's the only President elected to 3 terms. (Not that I'm not saying that there aren't huge differences between these two eras.)

Now, regardless of who was elected last week, unemployment is going to go down. We're still seeing signs of a slow recovery - there are two directions we can go - recovery, or back into a recession. It looks like recovery. 3 1/2 years from now, people will be saying, "wow, I didn't think they would work, but Obama's policies got us back on the right path" when in reality, we'll never know for certain whose policies would have done better for us.
4x
Nemesis 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:25 AM   #37
Nemesis 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPizza View Post
I disagree with the OP. Re: we're coming out of the largest recession since the Great Depression. Look what happened to the President who was around when we got out of the Depression - hint: he's the only President elected to 3 terms. (Not that I'm not saying that there aren't huge differences between these two eras.)

Now, regardless of who was elected last week, unemployment is going to go down. We're still seeing signs of a slow recovery - there are two directions we can go - recovery, or back into a recession. It looks like recovery. 3 1/2 years from now, people will be saying, "wow, I didn't think they would work, but Obama's policies got us back on the right path" when in reality, we'll never know for certain whose policies would have done better for us.
Dreamer , Its not going to happen. Befor 2013 is over you will be cring like a baby . in your misery for you brought it upon yourselves. Obama is pure evil . The man has never spoken a true word.
Nemesis 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:36 AM   #38
Juddog
Diamond Member
 
Juddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonbjerg View Post
They also need to get their heads out of the bibles ass...religion has to much to say in politics in the US...thank "god" (pun intended) that the younger generation more and more rejects superstition

Magic underwear...FFS!!! LOL
^^ True - as religion dies off, the bible-thumpers become less and less relevant, so the GOP going for the religious vote will be shooting themselves in the foot.

The GOP needs to concentrate on it's true strength: fiscal responsibility. Abandon this religion bullcrap and focus on the real issues instead of worrying about "the gays getting married", abortion, etc.. The GOP has driven away it's moderate votes; an example would be some of my extended family that simply chose to not vote this election because they're sick of the GOP pandering to the religious constituents. They like the GOP's stance on financial matters and if it dealing purely with finance would have voted Republican.
__________________
System 1: E8500 Core 2 duo, SLI'd 512 MB 8800 GT's (G92 core), 4 GB Patriot Viper 2000 DDR3 RAM, Vista 64 bit SP2, EVGA 790i FTW
System 2: Bloomfield i7 930 CPU, currently overclocked to 4.2 Ghz on water, MSI Radeon 7870 Ghz Edition, Corsair Dominator 2000 6 GB triple channel RAM, OCZ vertex boot volume, MSI big bang Xpower motherboard.

Last edited by Juddog; 11-12-2012 at 08:39 AM.
Juddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 08:40 AM   #39
Agent11
Diamond Member
 
Agent11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,487
Default

So what was the last fiscally responsible Republican administration?
__________________
-11
Agent11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 09:35 AM   #40
bignateyk
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 11,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Vega View Post
Obama's second term will be bad for Dems and it's not even his fault - and here's why.

The GOP failed because it was too extreme to the right on social issues. People love the financial stuff and the business stuff but can't get past the creepy religious stuff and some perceived and some real racial issues.

So what is the GOP going to do now? Fix it, of course. They are going to back off on social issues and adopt a more Libertarian stance meanwhile focusing on business and financial conservatism - things people care deeply about.

Meanwhile, the Democrats will not drop ANY of their extremest views. What you're going to get in 2016 is a GOP candidate which will pull in all the base Republican voters - that's the 59 million people who voted for Romney, all the independent voters and all the centrist Democrats, around 20 million people. The Democrats however, will still be holding on to their extremist views. It will be the same thing which just happened to the GOP except for the Democrats.



<---- Registered Libertarian, voted for Gary Johnson

As an independent who voted for Obama, I really hope this is true, but given all the GOP party folk talking about how they lost because they were too moderate, I'm a little wary. If they actually backed off on social issues I would go back to voting republican.
bignateyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 09:45 AM   #41
hal2kilo
Diamond Member
 
hal2kilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Washington State
Posts: 4,126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradley View Post
Anyhow, Eisenhower was likely the last true conservative President. And that was over fifty years ago.
And the current GOP would consider him way too moderate and he would not make it through the primaries.
__________________
I'm a liberal because I'm a realist.

Go Seahawks! SUPERBOWL 48 CHAMPS!

Last edited by hal2kilo; 11-12-2012 at 10:20 AM.
hal2kilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:13 AM   #42
soundforbjt
Diamond Member
 
soundforbjt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In an office
Posts: 6,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent11 View Post
So what was the last fiscally responsible Republican administration?
Ike most likely.
__________________
"Soitenly, if at first you don't succeed, keep on suckin' till you do succeed." - Curly Howard


The Heat 106-0-0
soundforbjt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:18 AM   #43
bradley
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hal2kilo View Post
An the current GOP would consider him way too moderate and he would not make it through the primaries.
Forget conservatives, the average American cannot agree on fundamental differences between illegal vs. legal immigration or unalienable vs. inalienable rights... just for starters. That's a real problem going into any election.
bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:29 AM   #44
Blackjack200
Diamond Member
 
Blackjack200's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 8,982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nehalem256 View Post
The Republican Party is not opposed to immigration. It is opposed to illegal immigration. It is pretty sad that you are arguing that the Republican Party does to embrace law breaking to win votes.

They have no need to change their stance on abortion. They simply need to ban anyone from the party who utters the word rape. Voters for whom abortion rights is super important are not going to vote Republican just because the Republicans flip/flop on abortion.

I do not think that the gay/lesbian vote is big enough to be important.
In your first paragraph you made a completely meaningless distinction. Any Democrat will tell you that they are opposed to illegal immigration, any Republican will tell you that they not opposed to legal immagration. The differences emerge when you ask what should be done about illegal immagrents that are here today and their children.

The positions that the Republican Party takes on those issues today are unpalatable to a huge number of hispanic voters.

The Republican Stand on abortion is there to satisfy the evangelical base. That base sees an exception for rape as a loophole that any woman could drive a truck through. In other words:

- Woman has consentual sex
- Woman gets pregnant
- Woman goes to get abortion
- Doctor asks woman "Were you raped?"
- Woman says 'urmm... yep' and gets abortion

So the republicans cannot allow for any exceptions, and when they are forced to answer direct questions about the position, they can be demonized. It's a pretty effective tactic for Pro-Choice advocates, and ultimately Republicans will have to decide if they're better off continuing to pander to evangelicals or leaving them behind to appeal to a broader band of voters.

Also, the gay/lesbian vote is not just gays and lesbians. It's very important to me that elected officials protect civil rights for all Americans, and I imagine there are a lot of people that think like me. Again Republicans will simply have to decide wether it makes more sense to carry near 100% of the evangelical vote, or be more appealing to the more moderate public. One thing they might want to consider is that social acceptance of homosexuality has moved at almost breathtaking speed, and a young politician that takes any kind of anti-gay position can destroy his/her career in the future if things continue as they are.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nehalem256 View Post
This is a fairly likely scenario.

Where the Republicans screwed up was continuing their "no compromise" plan after retaking the House in 2010.

If they had instead dropped their obsession with tax cuts for the rich they could gotten probably 90% of their economic agenda passed. And looked much more populist at the same time.

Since jobs have grown every month since Republicans retook the house, they could point to that as an accomplishment of the awesome "new" Republican Party. I believe that people would also have been much more willing to vote for a constructive party than an obstructionist party. Sure, maybe it would have still given Obama a 2nd term. But between that and shutting up about rape the Republicans would have probably retaken the Senate, gained in the house, and been able to bully Obama into almost a Republican puppet. As well as giving them a strong base for retaking the presidency in 2016.

As it is now, assuming the economy continues to improve, Democrats will be able to claim they are the ones responsible for it.
I agree with almost all of this.
Blackjack200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:35 AM   #45
Ausm
Lifer
 
Ausm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Madison,Wi
Posts: 25,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Vega View Post
Obama's second term will be bad for Dems and it's not even his fault - and here's why.

The GOP failed because it was too extreme to the right on social issues. People love the financial stuff and the business stuff but can't get past the creepy religious stuff and some perceived and some real racial issues.

So what is the GOP going to do now? Fix it, of course. They are going to back off on social issues and adopt a more Libertarian stance meanwhile focusing on business and financial conservatism - things people care deeply about.

Meanwhile, the Democrats will not drop ANY of their extremest views. What you're going to get in 2016 is a GOP candidate which will pull in all the base Republican voters - that's the 59 million people who voted for Romney, all the independent voters and all the centrist Democrats, around 20 million people. The Democrats however, will still be holding on to their extremist views. It will be the same thing which just happened to the GOP except for the Democrats.



<---- Registered Libertarian, voted for Gary Johnson
LMFAO Could you please elaborate what views you consider to be extremist?

/Lawnchair

/popcorn

/beer
__________________
It's ok to eat fish, because fish don't have any feelings.

You know your're getting old when MILF'S look young
Ausm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:37 AM   #46
Ausm
Lifer
 
Ausm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Madison,Wi
Posts: 25,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent11 View Post
So what was the last fiscally responsible Republican administration?
What amazes me their sheepal REALLY think (I use that term loosely) that they ARE Fiscally responsible LMFAO!!
__________________
It's ok to eat fish, because fish don't have any feelings.

You know your're getting old when MILF'S look young
Ausm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 10:57 AM   #47
werepossum
Lifer
 
werepossum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 17,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPizza View Post
I disagree with the OP. Re: we're coming out of the largest recession since the Great Depression. Look what happened to the President who was around when we got out of the Depression - hint: he's the only President elected to 3 terms. (Not that I'm not saying that there aren't huge differences between these two eras.)

Now, regardless of who was elected last week, unemployment is going to go down. We're still seeing signs of a slow recovery - there are two directions we can go - recovery, or back into a recession. It looks like recovery. 3 1/2 years from now, people will be saying, "wow, I didn't think they would work, but Obama's policies got us back on the right path" when in reality, we'll never know for certain whose policies would have done better for us.
I suspect you are correct. I also suspect the Republicans will pick a more socially conservative candidate in 2016 and will lose again. The Pubbies are in a real pickle; their socially conservative voters won't show up unless the candidate is doctrinaire socially conservative, moderates won't vote for a candidate who is doctrinaire socially conservative, and the increasingly important Hispanic vote is never going to vote Republican until they fold and adopt Democrat policies.

Bottom line, the Democrats won. It's no longer a traditional American nation; it's now a center left nation.
__________________
"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on, you know,
72 degrees at all times and -- whether we're living in the desert or we're living in the
tundra, and then just expect that every other country is going to say, okay, you know you
guys go ahead and keep on using 25% of the world's energy - Barack Hussein Obama
werepossum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:19 AM   #48
nehalem256
Lifer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 12,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by werepossum View Post
I suspect you are correct. I also suspect the Republicans will pick a more socially conservative candidate in 2016 and will lose again. The Pubbies are in a real pickle; their socially conservative voters won't show up unless the candidate is doctrinaire socially conservative, moderates won't vote for a candidate who is doctrinaire socially conservative, and the increasingly important Hispanic vote is never going to vote Republican until they fold and adopt Democrat policies.

Bottom line, the Democrats won. It's no longer a traditional American nation; it's now a center left nation.
Moderates will not vote for a social conservative when the party he represents stands for nothing beyond not-Obama.

The trick with social issues is not to make them the centerpiece of your campaign, but still be able to bring them up to target certain demographics. And never mention the r-word
nehalem256 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:24 AM   #49
feralkid
Diamond Member
 
feralkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Live long and bite me.
Posts: 9,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quest55720 View Post
they need to go back to the old stance on abortion with the exceptions. When you run candidates who are against all abortions rape will come up. Because that candidate will have to justify their no exception stance since it is not main steam. It is just an easy target the democrats can use.


It is time to drop the anti gay marriage the public has changed their opinions on this issue. The anti gay marriage people got their asses handed to them going 0-4 despite a huge spending advantage. You lose not only the gay/lesbian vote but those who think the government has no business dictating what people can do in their bedroom with a consenting adult. You know real small government conservatives.

On immigration i don't want the gop to cave on it. Just caving on it won't get them any votes from the latino community. I am for reform if the boarders are secure first so we never have to deal with it again. Take the returning soldiers from the wars and station some of them on the boarder and secure boarder.
b-o r-d-e-r
feralkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 11:45 AM   #50
Gonad the Barbarian
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,764
Default

Republican financial stuff is just as creepy as their religious stuff.
__________________
Say No to job-killing regulations and Yes to people-killing jobs!
Gonad the Barbarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.