Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Software > Software for Windows

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals
· Free Stuff
· Contests and Sweepstakes
· Black Friday 2013
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-09-2012, 02:42 PM   #1
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,797
Exclamation Latest AV Comparatives Real World Test



http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart2.php
berryracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 04:59 PM   #2
Cancer12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 507
Default

I can't seem to find MS security essentials in there.
Cancer12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 08:34 PM   #3
hclarkjr
Lifer
 
hclarkjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hostetter PA USA
Posts: 11,304
Default

NOD32 is the best hands down
__________________
http://heatware.com/eval.php?id=2478 205-0-0
Cooler master HAF932, Dell 2408WFP, Gigabyte P67A-UD4 B3 REV. 1.1, Intel core I7 2600K, XIGMATEK SD-1283 Gaia, Intel X25-M G2 160GB,16gb G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 1600mhz,Crossfired Radeon HD6950, Pioneer BDR-205, Samsung SH-S243N 24X DVD-RW, western digital black 2TB,Antec TPQ-850 850W , windows 8.1 pro X64
hclarkjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 06:01 PM   #4
smitbret
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,042
Default

Norton is noticably absent as we'll.

Also, after reading these charts, I still can't fathom why anyone with common sense bothers to pay for AV when AVG and Avast perform so well.
smitbret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 06:58 PM   #5
SKORPI0
Lifer
 
SKORPI0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: I'm from the internet
Posts: 11,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hclarkjr View Post
NOD32 is the best hands down
I use that together with Malwarebytes Anti-Malware.
__________________
HP TouchPad - Dual boot Android CM10 (Jelly Bean 4.12) and webOS (F4 Phantom Kernel).
Anandtech Off Topic [Archive] - May 2000-present
i7 3930k @ 4.3GHz @ 1.28v, Asus Sabertooth X79, 32GB (4x8GB) DDR3 1866, PNY GTX 680 4GB, CM HAF 932 Advanced, CM Silent Pro Gold 1kW.
NZXT Kraken X60 PULL, Samsung 830 128gb SSD (Windows 7), Kingston
SSDNow V300 120gb (OS X 10.8.2), Dual Yamakasi 2703, Logitech MK320.
SKORPI0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 07:00 PM   #6
Pardus
Diamond Member
 
Pardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smitbret View Post
Norton is noticably absent as we'll.

Also, after reading these charts, I still can't fathom why anyone with common sense bothers to pay for AV when AVG and Avast perform so well.
Symantec/Norton products are the actual virus themselves. MS Sec. Essentials and Super AntiSpyware works great on Win 7/8. No need to pay subscription fees.
Pardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 08:08 PM   #7
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,797
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cancer12 View Post
I can't seem to find MS security essentials in there.
Because MSE is not an antivirus. It is an upgraded version of the crappy Windows Defender

Here is a test about MSE by another Virus Testing Company:

I have said it many times but noone believes, MSE is one of the worst antivirus programs out there! Yes it is light on resources but it sucks big time in protection!

I have had 2 viruses crawl twice on to my system even though I am a safe user. Furthermore, it sucks in deleting any threats

AV-TEST - The Independent IT-Security Institute: Jul/Aug 2012

berryracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2012, 08:09 PM   #8
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smitbret View Post
Norton is noticably absent as we'll.
Symantec refuses to enter in any of these Virus Tests since ages

Hmmm, I wonder why
berryracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2012, 02:25 AM   #9
stevech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cancer12 View Post
I can't seem to find MS security essentials in there.
Me Either. I use it. Dumped others.

stevech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 10:28 AM   #10
zokudu
Diamond Member
 
zokudu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,077
Default

I use MSE and Malwarebytes but if someone I know wants to pay for anti-virus for whatever reason I always tell them Kapersky. Good to see it holds up well.
__________________
AMD FX-8320 | XFX Radeon HD7970 | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 | 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws | Crucial m4 128 GB | Windows 8 x64 Professional
Steam | Xbox | last.fm | Heat
I like my women how I like my filesystems...FAT and 16
zokudu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 12:12 PM   #11
nine9s
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 282
Default

Norton is still tested by others. Here is AV Tests latest: http://www.av-test.org/no_cache/en/t...t_no%5D=122694

This one puts Kapersky and Norton on par with AAA rating. And Bitdefender next at AA. Avast is not tested but AVG paid program gets a C. http://www.dennistechnologylabs.com/...12_Q3_Home.pdf

Last edited by nine9s; 11-14-2012 at 12:18 PM.
nine9s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 12:13 PM   #12
nine9s
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 282
Default

Is Kapersky hard on resources?
nine9s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 02:55 PM   #13
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nine9s View Post
Is Kapersky hard on resources?
Kaspersky Internet Security is, But the AntiVirus is very light

I use KAV and its very light and effective
berryracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 07:02 PM   #14
rgallant
Golden Member
 
rgallant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,076
Default

looks like my McAfee sucks by those test
-but I have no issues with it ,never had a false positive that I know of. never had to shut it down for any software loads , no issues with any games.
-but the av is only half the package as they don't rate the firewall that comes with it,
- and I put more value on data leaving my machine than having a trashed os.[have backups]
-also once a monthish I get software updates ,
-and definitions usually once a day , it'll wait till I shut down a game -download then notify me.
-so it might not be the best , but I have no reason to change at this point.

-norton back in 2000ish had to start in safe mode once a month and uninstall it ,before I could boot to the os. LOL
__________________
3770k [KL370]|| 3xMCR320[basement] || MR|| 655x2 ek-tops || 9xSFF21F || Vl4n
MVF WC || Evga GTX 780sc sli EK block,s
Sam 256gb 840 Pro|| HAF 932 || 8 gb Tridents 2400
W7HP-64 || 27"A850D || AX1200w || G15,G13,G500s
SB-Z -analog >Yamaha 765 AVR, 4x PSB alpha b1 ,1 x PSB alpha C1 ,10" sub
rgallant is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 07:36 PM   #15
xSauronx
Lifer
 
xSauronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 19,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berryracer View Post
Symantec refuses to enter in any of these Virus Tests since ages

Hmmm, I wonder why
not surprised. the company i work for sells symantec heavily. i hate the everloving hell out of it. we run into a major sep manager issue pretty much every month at one customer or another, and ive lost count of how many customers want to know why theyre paying for AV software when they keep getting infected

/some of them click the shiny buttons, but not all of them
__________________
LET'S GO 'CANES [they arent going anywhere. ever.]
Free speech doesn't protect speech you like, it protects speech you hate.

Heatware |
xSauronx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 05:46 AM   #16
berryracer
Golden Member
 
berryracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xSauronx View Post
not surprised. the company i work for sells symantec heavily. i hate the everloving hell out of it. we run into a major sep manager issue pretty much every month at one customer or another, and ive lost count of how many customers want to know why theyre paying for AV software when they keep getting infected

/some of them click the shiny buttons, but not all of them
there we go! another live proof! thanks for sharing that info! even though you work for a company that sells their products, you are actually honest about them!

What do you personally run?
berryracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:50 AM   #17
Bonesdad
Platinum Member
 
Bonesdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berryracer View Post
Symantec refuses to enter in any of these Virus Tests since ages

Hmmm, I wonder why
If you use the dropdown menu, you'll see that Symantec was there for the last 2 year (2011, 2010) and ranked in the top three. I don't/won't use a paid AV myself anymore, but don't think it's fair to say they suck either. Years ago, Norton was a HUGE resource hog, dragging down any computer. Not sure if that's the case anymore, but one tag I think they will always be stuck with.

Non-enthusiasts continue to pay for AV, often Norton. Simply because it comes on the computer and they have "heard of them".
__________________
I only SEEM conceited, but it's just because I'm better than you, and you know it...

heat = 3-0-0 Ebay = 71-0-0
Bonesdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:06 AM   #18
xSauronx
Lifer
 
xSauronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 19,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by berryracer View Post
there we go! another live proof! thanks for sharing that info! even though you work for a company that sells their products, you are actually honest about them!

What do you personally run?
MSE. but i dont really engage is risky browsing behaviors so the risk of my machine getting infected is pretty low.

i liked the mcafee console better when I used that at my last job (sort of), but the agents had a LOT of issues and ate up a huge amount of resources when running a scan.
__________________
LET'S GO 'CANES [they arent going anywhere. ever.]
Free speech doesn't protect speech you like, it protects speech you hate.

Heatware |
xSauronx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 11:12 AM   #19
xSauronx
Lifer
 
xSauronx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 19,270
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonesdad View Post
If you use the dropdown menu, you'll see that Symantec was there for the last 2 year (2011, 2010) and ranked in the top three. I don't/won't use a paid AV myself anymore, but don't think it's fair to say they suck either. Years ago, Norton was a HUGE resource hog, dragging down any computer. Not sure if that's the case anymore, but one tag I think they will always be stuck with.

Non-enthusiasts continue to pay for AV, often Norton. Simply because it comes on the computer and they have "heard of them".
norton may have been a huge hog, we dont really use it, we stick to symantec endpoint protection which doesn't seem to take up that many resources. we sell norton to home customers for some reason but i dont really do much support for those. id rather see us sell symantec cloud since we order media for norton (no, i dont know why, its 2012 and my company is full of idiots). would make more sense for the company since they could manage subscriptions for customers and just shoot an email link to download a client but eh...whatever. im not going to suggest it because i dont want to have to manage it
__________________
LET'S GO 'CANES [they arent going anywhere. ever.]
Free speech doesn't protect speech you like, it protects speech you hate.

Heatware |
xSauronx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:30 PM   #20
0___________0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 284
Default

These tests are run on samples that are old, when you conduct these tests with malware that is new detection rates drop drastically, down to around 30% for stuff less than a week old. So my concern with AV is its behavior based detection, and unfortunately a lot of the big names have taken the "install and forget it" approach. They don't inform the user of possibly malicious activity because they might accidentally block something benign and useful.

Of course, I don't download crap or visit shady websites or run Java or keep out of date stuff, so I'm not concerned that much. But for those that aren't very careful, I hate to see so many people run AV that's just not sufficient.
0___________0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.