Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Social > Politics and News

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

View Poll Results: Which is worse?
Intellectual Dishonesty 54 77.14%
Personal Insults 16 22.86%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-08-2012, 02:25 PM   #626
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

So... some folks said that things would get better after the election.

Anyone seeing it? Not me.
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 02:28 PM   #627
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
So... some folks said that things would get better after the election.

Anyone seeing it? Not me.
Heh at least wait for the hard feelings to subside.
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 05:02 PM   #628
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
Heh at least wait for the hard feelings to subside.
Which decade do you think that will be?
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 06:36 PM   #629
Newbian
Lifer
 
Newbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
Which decade do you think that will be?
Give it awhile until the teasing stops as they earned it for a bit with so much hate they posted.
Newbian is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 07:43 PM   #630
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbian View Post
Give it awhile until the teasing stops as they earned it for a bit with so much hate they posted.
Yeah, right.

I started a thread about Coulter today and on the first page I got this reply: "I bet Coulter likes it up the butt with a donkey punch."

Nothing is going to change around here until some proper rules of behavior are instituted and enforced.
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 07:48 PM   #631
Bowfinger
Lifer
 
Bowfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
Yeah, right.

I started a thread about Coulter today and on the first page I got this reply: "I bet Coulter likes it up the butt with a donkey punch."

Nothing is going to change around here until some proper rules of behavior are instituted and enforced.
I'm not a mod, of course, but I'm betting a comment like that is good for at least a sanction ... if someone reports it. It seems over the line to me, and I think Coulter is one of the most repugnant people on Earth.
__________________
If you never encounter anything in your community that offends you, you're not living in a free society.

"An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it." - Jef Mallett.
Bowfinger is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 08:18 PM   #632
Newbian
Lifer
 
Newbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 21,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
Yeah, right.

I started a thread about Coulter today and on the first page I got this reply: "I bet Coulter likes it up the butt with a donkey punch."

Nothing is going to change around here until some proper rules of behavior are instituted and enforced.
Read the rule as it was not broken there.

If it bothers you this much stay away from P&N for awhile.
Newbian is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 07:40 AM   #633
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
Yeah, right.

I started a thread about Coulter today and on the first page I got this reply: "I bet Coulter likes it up the butt with a donkey punch."

Nothing is going to change around here until some proper rules of behavior are instituted and enforced.
I don't believe there is anything in the rules prohibiting us from insulting Coulter.
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 11:53 AM   #634
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
I don't believe there is anything in the rules prohibiting us from insulting Coulter.
There isn't anything in the rules right now prohibiting anything at all.

I think Coulter is a target-rich environment enough without getting into sex acts.
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 11:57 AM   #635
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
There isn't anything in the rules right now prohibiting anything at all.

I think Coulter is a target-rich environment enough without getting into sex acts.
The only consolation I can offer you is "lighten up, Francis."
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 11:59 AM   #636
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
There isn't anything in the rules right now prohibiting anything at all.

I think Coulter is a target-rich environment enough without getting into sex acts.
There's nothing in the rules prohibiting anything at all, but in practice it's a different matter. Depending on which side of the political spectrum you're on you stand a much better chance of being reined in if you're on the right. I'll also freely admit that's my perception and my bias may skew my observations.
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:07 PM   #637
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
There's nothing in the rules prohibiting anything at all, but in practice it's a different matter. Depending on which side of the political spectrum you're on you stand a much better chance of being reined in if you're on the right. I'll also freely admit that's my perception and my bias may skew my observations.
Maybe it's not your bias and maybe those on the right do stand a much better chance of being reined in. Maybe, just maybe, it is because their thought process can trend towards toxic much more often, though. I'm not saying definitely, mind you. Just food for thought.
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:12 PM   #638
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

I agree with monovillage.

I don't think it's intentional, I think it's a result of the confusing rules currently in place and the inconsistent way they are enforced.
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:49 PM   #639
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
Maybe it's not your bias and maybe those on the right do stand a much better chance of being reined in. Maybe, just maybe, it is because their thought process can trend towards toxic much more often, though. I'm not saying definitely, mind you. Just food for thought.
Define "toxic" as it applies to the ATP&N forum. I mean it sounds good, but what does it actually mean in terms of posting political observations or comments?
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 01:37 PM   #640
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Define "toxic" as it applies to the ATP&N forum. I mean it sounds good, but what does it actually mean in terms of posting political observations or comments?
"Toxic" as in something that hurts the system into which it is introduced. Not the good kind of hurt, like a needle from a syringe delivering a vaccine or a bitter tasting spoonful of medicine that will eventually help cure the system of what ails it, but the bad kind of hurt like when someone downs a cup full of Drano or when someone asks someone else to define a word that everyone knows what it means, including the one asking for the definition, because he wants to debate the irrelevant finer points of the definition rather than actually evaluate the original post as a whole.
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 03:10 PM   #641
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
"Toxic" as in something that hurts the system into which it is introduced. Not the good kind of hurt, like a needle from a syringe delivering a vaccine or a bitter tasting spoonful of medicine that will eventually help cure the system of what ails it, but the bad kind of hurt like when someone downs a cup full of Drano or when someone asks someone else to define a word that everyone knows what it means, including the one asking for the definition, because he wants to debate the irrelevant finer points of the definition rather than actually evaluate the original post as a whole.
Definitions aren't what I would consider irrelevant in evaluating whether a post is "toxic" or not. You are just dodging the question when you can't give an honest and fair evaluation of what is "toxic" in terms of posting in this political/news forum.
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 03:32 PM   #642
dank69
Lifer
 
dank69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Corner of FORECLOSURE and BÅNKRUPTCY ST.
Posts: 13,123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dank69 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Define "toxic" as it applies to the ATP&N forum. I mean it sounds good, but what does it actually mean in terms of posting political observations or comments?
"Toxic" as in something that hurts the system into which it is introduced. Not the good kind of hurt, like a needle from a syringe delivering a vaccine or a bitter tasting spoonful of medicine that will eventually help cure the system of what ails it, but the bad kind of hurt like when someone downs a cup full of Drano or when someone asks someone else to define a word that everyone knows what it means, including the one asking for the definition, because he wants to debate the irrelevant finer points of the definition rather than actually evaluate the original post as a whole.
Definitions aren't what I would consider irrelevant in evaluating whether a post is "toxic" or not. You are just dodging the question when you can't give an honest and fair evaluation of what is "toxic" in terms of posting in this political/news forum.
"Toxic" as in claiming I dodged your question when in actuality I answered it directly. I bolded the answer above so you can't claim you missed it again. It *should* have been relatively easy for you to extrapolate that ATP&N is the system and anything that anything that "hurts" ATP&N could be classified as "toxic."

Delving into the nitty-gritty of what is toxic, or what "hurts" the forum, has already been shown to be a subjective thing. For example, if I called you a fucking retard, you and many others might think that that would qualify as toxic while others might not. This is why you want to go there in the first place. You know that once you get into the subjective level, nobody can "win," therefore you cannot "lose."

What you refuse to see, is that all that matters in this forum is what the people responsible for running it want it to be. They are the ones who get to decide what is or is not toxic. Not you. Not me. They have opened up avenues for discussion allowing us, the members, to voice our opinions about what we would like the forum to be. Avenues like this thread, and the poll I started that was merged into it. The problem is, you don't want to believe what the poll tells you. The poll tells you that the members here overwhelmingly believe that intellectual dishonesty is a bigger problem than insults. Rather than look at it and accept that other people do not think like you do, you instead go into a state of denial, claiming that the way the poll was introduced was biased.
__________________
Nemesis 1: Above your age please. The climate is in fact warmer now . Maybe this erection will cool things down mother earth shes hot.

pcgeek11: IMO: Being gay is not a minority. It is a genetic defect

Idontcare: dank69 is hereby permabanned.

Last edited by dank69; 11-09-2012 at 03:35 PM.
dank69 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 03:40 PM   #643
Moonbeam
Elite Member
 
Moonbeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 52,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Definitions aren't what I would consider irrelevant in evaluating whether a post is "toxic" or not. You are just dodging the question when you can't give an honest and fair evaluation of what is "toxic" in terms of posting in this political/news forum.
There is no way to objectively identify what toxic is because we all have different body chemistries. To the right everything on the left is toxic and visa versa. Both are brain dead in the other's eyes. Every point anybody can make can be countered by an opposite opinion. And if you tell this to the left or the right they will deny it. Only the other side is insane. The number of objective people like myself is exceedingly small.

That is why I believe that if you eliminate personal attacks and unsubstanciated or unargued opinions you eliminate a lot of the grief. Anybody who attacks my point of view is in for trouble. That is why, when I post a point of view backed up by incredible logic and reason, I want to hear from anybody dense enough to disagree, first before they present their own worthless case, that they say:

Dear Sir, I respect your opinion and have considered it from every angle and find it to be profoundly compelling, but I have a small question here which I wish you to clarify for me. I thought reality worked this way and here are my reasons. What is your considered opinion of this, and to which I would have to reply:

Dear Sir, you raise an excellent point worthy of consideration and how I see it is this:

No put downs and no unsupported opinions blown out people's asses. We don't need, I think, to catch every violation. We have been told the job for moderators is too large. Maybe we could figure out how to create a random number that would identify some single thread, maybe one a week, or whatever is possible to do, and review some random number of posts in that thread, in case it is too big a thread to handle given the Mod's time. People found in violation could get some kind of sanction that would accumulate to increasing time bans.

I think if we leave it up to decent people to moderate themselves the decent people will do that while they get their teeth kicked in. I don't think that's fair or balanced which puts unnecessary work on folk who don't care about appearing reasonable, like myself.
__________________
The above is probably just my usual sarcasm and in no way reflects my real opinion (and,or) may include subtleties of sufficient rarity as to appear to the unsuspecting like total gibberish. It may not be so much a matter that I'm far out, but rather that you have never been anywhere.
Moonbeam is online now  
Old 11-09-2012, 03:45 PM   #644
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Good to see that you support different rules for different points of view. I'm not surprised.


You're my hero Moonie.
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 06:34 PM   #645
Moonbeam
Elite Member
 
Moonbeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 52,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Good to see that you support different rules for different points of view. I'm not surprised.


You're my hero Moonie.
Dear Moonie, I think I detect in your post that you favor different rules for different points of view. I see that (......) and (<<<<<) Am I correct or incorrect about this?

Dear mono, I don't know how to answer because I saw nothing to support your case. I don't know what case you are trying to make. I appreciate your interest but would need clarification to respond. I am particularly puzzled since I do not support different rules for different points of views. I support the notion that putting other people down should not be allowed and that nobody left or right, should be able to unload personal opinions without providing reasons for they think support them. The debate can then proceed over the logicality and persuasiveness of the provided reasons. In shout, we need to have something constructive and supposedly factual to discuss.

PS, calling me a hero actually seems to me more like a put down here. I feel you were being sarcastic. Am I wrong?
__________________
The above is probably just my usual sarcasm and in no way reflects my real opinion (and,or) may include subtleties of sufficient rarity as to appear to the unsuspecting like total gibberish. It may not be so much a matter that I'm far out, but rather that you have never been anywhere.

Last edited by Moonbeam; 11-09-2012 at 06:37 PM.
Moonbeam is online now  
Old 11-09-2012, 07:31 PM   #646
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonbeam View Post
Dear Moonie, I think I detect in your post that you favor different rules for different points of view. I see that (......) and (<<<<<) Am I correct or incorrect about this?

Dear mono, I don't know how to answer because I saw nothing to support your case. I don't know what case you are trying to make. I appreciate your interest but would need clarification to respond. I am particularly puzzled since I do not support different rules for different points of views. I support the notion that putting other people down should not be allowed and that nobody left or right, should be able to unload personal opinions without providing reasons for they think support them. The debate can then proceed over the logicality and persuasiveness of the provided reasons. In shout, we need to have something constructive and supposedly factual to discuss.

PS, calling me a hero actually seems to me more like a put down here. I feel you were being sarcastic. Am I wrong?
No sarcasm meant, we disagree on many things, especially your penchant for thinking that a conservative political stance is indicative of brain damage, but I have no perception that you're malicious about it.
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-10-2012, 03:15 PM   #647
Charles Kozierok
Elite Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,762
Default

Mister Perknose -- Clean Up This Forum.

Quote:
I'm fairly sure everyone else didn't respond because they wanted to see what the reply would be if we turn the racial profiling of the bad race into asians who are the MOST RACIST on this forum.

You ruined you you dumb fuck.

Probably because you're asians, asians are stupid.
...
Should have written "anyone from Eeastern Europe" what a dread on society they are, just send them back to wherever they came from...

Fucking Poles are pickpocketers and Yuggie traveler families not to mention Hungarian rapists and Balkan murderers, enough already, send them back.

I'm only half joking on this one though, THESE are the groups in Europe that commit most crimes, not Muslims, not Africans, fucking Eastern Europeans, you know, Bush's bed buddies, the "new Europeans", if you like them, YOU take them because we're fucking tired of them.

All waste of breath bullshit retards who cannot recite the alphabet in any language but do buy vodka by the gallon each week.
(Please. )
__________________
"Of those who say nothing, few are silent." -- Thomas Neill
Charles Kozierok is offline  
Old 11-10-2012, 09:08 PM   #648
monovillage
Diamond Member
 
monovillage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N. California
Posts: 8,445
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesKozierok View Post
Mister Perknose -- Clean Up This Forum.

(Please. )
Good luck with that C.K.
monovillage is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:13 AM   #649
dmcowen674
No Lifer
 
dmcowen674's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 54,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perknose View Post
The following amendment has been, at least temporarily, enacted:

Your substantive comments, respectfully presented, are welcome. But be warned that excessive trolling, thread derailment, etc. will be dealt with.
QUOTE=allisolm
Because you members voted to allow personal attacks in P&N
===============================================

She is right, I don't normally pay any attention to the bickering at the top threads.

I will continue to invite the resident cocksuckers to blow me.

That is all they are capable of and apparently approved.
dmcowen674 is offline  
Old 11-25-2012, 12:14 PM   #650
WHAMPOM
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by monovillage View Post
Good to see that you support different rules for different points of view. I'm not surprised.


You're my hero Moonie.
AH! A perfect example of a toxic post! Being purposefully dense in misstating the point of another's post and a sarcastic backhanded compliment!
__________________
After thirty years of union busting, deregulation, tax breaks for the rich and etc. nearly duplicating the economic conditions preceeding the Great Depression, you wonder why we had another one? 90% tax on the rich, that made this country great! Then Kennedy dropped it to 70% and it's been down hill ever since. Conservative's worst nightmare come true; a second term Obama Presidency. Rush Limbaugh the American Osama Bin Laden.
WHAMPOM is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.