Go Back   AnandTech Forums > Hardware and Technology > CPUs and Overclocking

Forums
· Hardware and Technology
· CPUs and Overclocking
· Motherboards
· Video Cards and Graphics
· Memory and Storage
· Power Supplies
· Cases & Cooling
· SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones PCs
· Networking
· Peripherals
· General Hardware
· Highly Technical
· Computer Help
· Home Theater PCs
· Consumer Electronics
· Digital and Video Cameras
· Mobile Devices & Gadgets
· Audio/Video & Home Theater
· Software
· Software for Windows
· All Things Apple
· *nix Software
· Operating Systems
· Programming
· PC Gaming
· Console Gaming
· Distributed Computing
· Security
· Social
· Off Topic
· Politics and News
· Discussion Club
· Love and Relationships
· The Garage
· Health and Fitness
· Home and Garden
· Merchandise and Shopping
· For Sale/Trade
· Hot Deals with Free Stuff/Contests
· Black Friday 2014
· Forum Issues
· Technical Forum Issues
· Personal Forum Issues
· Suggestion Box
· Moderator Resources
· Moderator Discussions
   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2012, 03:57 PM   #26
guskline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 3,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rvenger View Post
I am curious to see how an FX-8350 responds in this game since the i7-920 performs similar to the FX chip.
I have Max Payne 3 and the FX 8350 is being shipped to me as I type this. I'm replacing the 8150 in rig 3 below. I'll keep you posted.
__________________
3930k @ 4.6 -Asus SbTh X79 - Custom WC - MO-RA3 Pro-420 + RX 360+XSPC-2 Sapphire Tri X R9-290s-CF with EK blocks/bridge -16G (4x4 quad)DDR3-2133 - Intel 530 SSD - Win 8.1 - PC P&C 1200W Silencer Mk III - BenQ BL3200PT

Last edited by guskline; 11-06-2012 at 04:17 PM.
guskline is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012, 04:51 PM   #27
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

OT: guskline, it says "Asus 300" in your first rig, you probably mean the case, Antec 300?
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2012, 08:08 PM   #28
guskline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 3,090
Default

lehtv, sorry. Corrected. Should read Antec300
__________________
3930k @ 4.6 -Asus SbTh X79 - Custom WC - MO-RA3 Pro-420 + RX 360+XSPC-2 Sapphire Tri X R9-290s-CF with EK blocks/bridge -16G (4x4 quad)DDR3-2133 - Intel 530 SSD - Win 8.1 - PC P&C 1200W Silencer Mk III - BenQ BL3200PT
guskline is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 06:08 AM   #29
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv
I'll try it out with stock CPU clock tomorrow.
I tried it with medium-high settings. Didn't make any real difference

Code:
    Medium-high, CPU 2.8GHz
    Framerate    GPU load (%)
Min        51            42
Avg        109            84
Max        183            99
Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv
Code:
        Medium-high    
    Framerate    GPU load (%)
Min        49            62
Avg        110            87
Max        197            99
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 07:58 AM   #30
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,150
Default

Therefore I think you can conclude that there is no cpu bottleneck.

Like I said, I've found this game to be ultra-smooth even at low framerates.

Perhaps it was just vsync causing the problem.
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
Looking for Black Friday Deals? See TBG's Hot Deals Blog!
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 08:31 AM   #31
Jaydip
Diamond Member
 
Jaydip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Termie View Post
Therefore I think you can conclude that there is no cpu bottleneck.

Like I said, I've found this game to be ultra-smooth even at low framerates.

Perhaps it was just vsync causing the problem.
How can you concur that? from lehtv's data

CPU 2.8GHz GPU load 42%
CPU 3.36GHz GPU load 62%

GPU load is getting increased with cpu clock rates identifying a cpu bottleneck.
__________________
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit || i7 4770K @ 4.2 with CM V6-GT || MSI Z87 GD 65||MSI Gaming N780 TF 3GD5/OC GeForce GTX 780|| Corsair Vengeance 16GB 1600 || WD Cavier Black 1TB FAEX X2|| HAF-X || Corsair TX750 V2 ||AL MX 5021E || DELL U2713HM||SideWinder X4||Razer DA

Last edited by Jaydip; 11-07-2012 at 08:37 AM.
Jaydip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 09:30 AM   #32
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaydip View Post
How can you concur that? from lehtv's data

CPU 2.8GHz GPU load 42%
CPU 3.36GHz GPU load 62%

GPU load is getting increased with cpu clock rates identifying a cpu bottleneck.
You're looking at minimums. The GPU load was ~85% at both settings.
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
Looking for Black Friday Deals? See TBG's Hot Deals Blog!
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:24 AM   #33
Jaydip
Diamond Member
 
Jaydip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,299
Default

If the GPU load increase while increasing CPU clock its a classic CPU bottleneck situation.I understand your point but we need a frame rate graph @ stock to determine this.
__________________
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit || i7 4770K @ 4.2 with CM V6-GT || MSI Z87 GD 65||MSI Gaming N780 TF 3GD5/OC GeForce GTX 780|| Corsair Vengeance 16GB 1600 || WD Cavier Black 1TB FAEX X2|| HAF-X || Corsair TX750 V2 ||AL MX 5021E || DELL U2713HM||SideWinder X4||Razer DA
Jaydip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:50 AM   #34
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

I spotted a sweet deal on an i7-3770K + P8Z77-V, and grabbed it. They've been used a couple months, warranty and receipts left. Similarly priced new components would be 3570K + Z77 Extreme4.

I'll receive the parts in a few days, this will solve the mystery once and for all
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:54 AM   #35
Jaydip
Diamond Member
 
Jaydip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,299
Default

Cool
__________________
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit || i7 4770K @ 4.2 with CM V6-GT || MSI Z87 GD 65||MSI Gaming N780 TF 3GD5/OC GeForce GTX 780|| Corsair Vengeance 16GB 1600 || WD Cavier Black 1TB FAEX X2|| HAF-X || Corsair TX750 V2 ||AL MX 5021E || DELL U2713HM||SideWinder X4||Razer DA
Jaydip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 11:17 AM   #36
blckgrffn
Diamond Member
 
blckgrffn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 6,639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv View Post
I spotted a sweet deal on an i7-3770K + P8Z77-V, and grabbed it. They've been used a couple months, warranty and receipts left. Similarly priced new components would be 3570K + Z77 Extreme4.

I'll receive the parts in a few days, this will solve the mystery once and for all
Haha, excellent!
__________________
Crunch/Fold for the TeAm! http://forums.anandtech.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15

3930k @ 4.2 - GA-UP4 - 2x MSI TF3 7950 - 32GB EL RAM - Seasonic X650 - 840 250GB - U2913WM
blckgrffn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 11:55 AM   #37
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv View Post
I spotted a sweet deal on an i7-3770K + P8Z77-V, and grabbed it. They've been used a couple months, warranty and receipts left. Similarly priced new components would be 3570K + Z77 Extreme4.

I'll receive the parts in a few days, this will solve the mystery once and for all
That's one way to handle it!

You'll like the upgrade. Plenty of advantages of IVB/z77 over the older architecture, and given that your OC was limited, you'll have a lot more headroom with the new setup.

All that being said, I still don't think you were CPU-limited in MP3!
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
Looking for Black Friday Deals? See TBG's Hot Deals Blog!
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 01:08 PM   #38
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

Yeah I think you're right. But I already know I'm somewhat CPU limited in Alan Wake (uses only two threads), and more so in Battlefield 3 conquest. It's not all for nuthin'

I'm hoping for a nice 4.5 with the 3770K while keeping my Mugen 2 quiet
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2012, 10:41 PM   #39
Rvenger
VC&G Moderator
 
Rvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv View Post
Yeah I think you're right. But I already know I'm somewhat CPU limited in Alan Wake (uses only two threads), and more so in Battlefield 3 conquest. It's not all for nuthin'

I'm hoping for a nice 4.5 with the 3770K while keeping my Mugen 2 quiet

I hope you get a good chip because I'm running at 4.2ghz and I am getting 76c in IBT with a Havik 140. I can safely crank the speeds if I am running a benchmark, I just can't run IBT without hitting high 80s at 4.4.
__________________
i7-5820k - ASRock X99 Extreme 3 - 16gb Crucial DDR4 2133 - Nvidia Reference GTX 970- 2 x 240gb PNY Optima SSDs in Raid 0 - 3tb Seagate 7200.14 HDD - Rosewill HIVE 850 Modular PSU - Phanteks Enthoo Pro
Rvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 04:44 AM   #40
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

What temps do you get in Prime95 small FFT's, Rvenger?
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 12:57 PM   #41
Deders
Golden Member
 
Deders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv View Post
I play at medium-high because the game's vsync sucks. If I increase settings any more, the game forces to 30fps occasionally, when without vsync it wouldn't even break below 60fps. It's as if the game anticipates a dip below 60fps. But at 30fps the game just looks stuttery, so I go as low on the settings as needed to avoid the 30fps dips. This is not adaptive vsync, it's just an artificial fps limiter. FWIW I don't really notice an appreciable difference in image quality between medium/high and high/ultra.
You can use D3DOverrider to enable triple buffering so that it doesn't lock on to 30FPS when using Vsync. Mine came with RivaTuner224MSIMOA2009Edition.
Deders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 02:56 PM   #42
Rvenger
VC&G Moderator
 
Rvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lehtv View Post
What temps do you get in Prime95 small FFT's, Rvenger?

68c/71c/75c/66c after 30 mins.
__________________
i7-5820k - ASRock X99 Extreme 3 - 16gb Crucial DDR4 2133 - Nvidia Reference GTX 970- 2 x 240gb PNY Optima SSDs in Raid 0 - 3tb Seagate 7200.14 HDD - Rosewill HIVE 850 Modular PSU - Phanteks Enthoo Pro
Rvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 06:10 PM   #43
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

OK. I just tested my fresh 3770K at stock settings, it stays under 60C in Prime95 at the lowest fan speed (Noiseblocker B12-3 @ 5V). CPU-Z reports 3.7GHz. I think this is promising, as I can shave off 7-8C by running the fan at full speed, and that gives me around 30C of long-term safe headroom to play with

edit: time to edit sig
__________________
System specs

Last edited by lehtv; 11-08-2012 at 06:14 PM.
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 08:35 PM   #44
Rvenger
VC&G Moderator
 
Rvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,233
Default

Let us know what your 4.2 and 4.4ghz voltage and temps are. Looks like you might not have a hot running chip afterall.
__________________
i7-5820k - ASRock X99 Extreme 3 - 16gb Crucial DDR4 2133 - Nvidia Reference GTX 970- 2 x 240gb PNY Optima SSDs in Raid 0 - 3tb Seagate 7200.14 HDD - Rosewill HIVE 850 Modular PSU - Phanteks Enthoo Pro
Rvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 09:13 AM   #45
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rvenger View Post
Let us know what your 4.2 and 4.4ghz voltage and temps are. Looks like you might not have a hot running chip afterall.
I think I've found my stable 4.2 settings, but I've yet to run Prime for several hours and I haven't even tested LinX or IBT yet. Conversely my vCore could be a bit higher than needed.

All power saving settings, C-states etc. are on default/auto. LLC at 0%. Offset voltage at -0.030. BCLK 100.00, turbo multi 42.

I've got two front 120mm 1700RPM fans, one rear 120mm 1300RPM fan and 1700RPM 120mm CPU fan.

Door closed, all fans at the lowest speed (~50%): 73c, 72c, 71c, 75c

Door open, front fans at ~50% speed, rear and CPU fans at 100% speed: 64c, 68c, 65c, 66c

I'll test with 4.4 later on, I have a pretty good idea of what settings to use.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 09:13 AM   #46
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

Back on topic. Max Payne 3.

I tested the same sequence with 3770K @ 4.2. Well, almost the same sequence. I couldn't get past a bug right after a cut scene in the beginning of Chapter 5, I think this was due to having to reinstall Windows 7 and Max Payne 3 and then using my backed-up profile from the last install. I started from the second checkpoint this time around, so the sequence was a bit shorter. I adjusted the original result to make it as if I'd started from the second checkpoint.

Here are the GPU load and framerate results at medium-high settings:



11 fps higher average framerate, 5% higher average GPU load. These could be somewhat influenced by differences between the runs, the i7-920 run having taken a couple of minutes longer. Note that my graphics card is also running at PCIe 3.0 x16 now, instead of 2.0 x16 as it was previously.

i7 920 @ 3.36


i7-3770K @ 4.20



By the looks of the graphs, both framerate and GPU load fluctuate less with 3770K. So that's good.
__________________
System specs

Last edited by lehtv; 11-10-2012 at 09:47 AM.
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 10:01 AM   #47
Termie
Diamond Member
 
Termie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,150
Default

Looks about right to me. My own upgrade from i7-860@3.5 to i7-3770k@4.4 showed about a 3-4% increase in games that were not CPU-limited, which I attributed to the platform upgrade (PCIe 3.0, basically). Here are my results: http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost...58&postcount=2. You had 10% here, which is pretty substantial, but as you say, the sequence was a bit different.

As I would have predicted, the much more important number is the minimum framerate, rather than average framerate or average GPU usage. That's the one number you are absolutely going to feel. As an experiment, I'd suggest you try the same sequence at a CPU speed of 3.4 (i.e. underclocked) to get a clock-for-clock comparison. My guess is that the minimums will still be much higher. If so, it would tend to prove that even users with an i7-920/860@4.0 stand to gain a lot from an upgrade. If not, it tends to show that if you're already that highly clocked, you won't feel the difference.

Very cool graphs, by the way. What did you use to create them?
__________________
Work: 3770K | Hyper 212+ | Asus Max V Gene | 290 Tri-X | 16GB | 830 256GB | TJ08B-E | x650 | U2713HM
Gaming: 4770K@4.5 | H100i | ASRock Z97 Ex4 | 780 Ti SLI | 16GB | MX100 512GB | 500R | EVGA G2 850W | Asus VG248QE
HTPC: 4690K@4.0 | CM S524 | ASRock Z97E | HD7870 | 8GB | 1TB SSHD | SG08 | CX500M | Samsung 55" 4K
Looking for holiday tech gifts? Check out The 2014 Holiday Buyer's Guide at The Tech Buyer's Guru!
Looking for Black Friday Deals? See TBG's Hot Deals Blog!

Last edited by Termie; 11-10-2012 at 10:05 AM.
Termie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 10:52 AM   #48
lehtv
Diamond Member
 
lehtv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 9,958
Default

I was thinking of doing a lower clocked bench as well, actually. I'll try 33 * 102 MHz = 3366 MHz.
Quote:
Very cool graphs, by the way. What did you use to create them?
Thanks. OpenOffice Calc.
__________________
System specs
lehtv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.