|
|
 |
|
11-04-2012, 11:49 AM
|
#151
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,510
|
I just don't see how, if the heat sink fins themselves are spinning, the heat from the semi can be successfully transferred to the moving fins. How does the heat get to the fins? A spindle in the center? How much heat can that actually carry? And lubrication. What compound can not only lubricate, but allow the transfer of so much heat?
I'm thinking this isn't going to be anywhere near as efficient as they say it is.
__________________
Member of Nvidia Focus Group
NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time
to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.
Troll-Free Tech Zone
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 12:11 PM
|
#152
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,161
|
Keys didn't RTFA.
The lubricant is air.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 12:21 PM
|
#153
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keysplayr
I just don't see how
|
try reading the link or at least reading the thread.
__________________
Gaming rig - P8-Z68 PRO/ I5 2500k @4.2ghz / 650W antec trupower PSU/ 8gb vengeance /120gb OCZ agility 3/ 1TB F3 HDD/ 2TB F4 HDD/ GTX 560 TI OC/ HAF X/ Arctic cooling freezer 13 pro/
Lappy - Dell XPS17/ 740QM/ 8gb ram/120GB agility III/ 750gb WD 7200rpm/ GT445m/
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 02:43 PM
|
#154
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,482
|
Well all understand that heat can xfer from our current heatsink fins to the air blown by the fan.
Now, try to think how that can go either direction, it's reversible.
So you have one heated metal xfer heat to the airstream. You get hot air. But that hot airstream passes over another set of cool fins. The heat is xfered from the hot air to the cool fins.
So heat passes from one thing to another. It's not a one-way street. Heat goes downhill from hotter things to cooler things.
That's what the air bearing does, it lets heat go from one metal piece to air to another metal piece. That's how the heat crosses the air bearing.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 04:40 PM
|
#155
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,621
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keysplayr
I just don't see how, if the heat sink fins themselves are spinning, the heat from the semi can be successfully transferred to the moving fins. How does the heat get to the fins? A spindle in the center? How much heat can that actually carry? And lubrication. What compound can not only lubricate, but allow the transfer of so much heat?
I'm thinking this isn't going to be anywhere near as efficient as they say it is.
|
It's snake-oil looking for investors is all. That's all that's ever been. There is no benefit to spinning the whole heatsink, even if you could transfer heat to it just as fast as a normal set up.
|
|
|
11-04-2012, 05:40 PM
|
#156
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,161
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferzerp
It's snake-oil looking for investors is all. That's all that's ever been. There is no benefit to spinning the whole heatsink, even if you could transfer heat to it just as fast as a normal set up.
|
Sandia Labs is looking for investors?
They have plenty of cash, called your tax dollars.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 04:41 AM
|
#158
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phynaz
Keys didn't RTFA.
The lubricant is air.
|
You're 100% correct. I didn't. Just by looking at it screams poor heat transfer from semi to heatsink.
The lubricant is air? Even worse. What happens when there are air gaps between heatsink and heatshield in today's heatsink applications?
__________________
Member of Nvidia Focus Group
NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time
to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.
Troll-Free Tech Zone
Last edited by Keysplayr; 11-05-2012 at 04:43 AM.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 06:20 AM
|
#159
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keysplayr
You're 100% correct. I didn't. Just by looking at it screams poor heat transfer from semi to heatsink.
The lubricant is air? Even worse. What happens when there are air gaps between heatsink and heatshield in today's heatsink applications?
|
The gap is only 0.001". And unlike conventional coolers it is between two metallic surfaces (held together by magnetic attraction) with one spinning at 2000 RPM.
Here is a nice short PDF about the design which FAQ section provides good information and links to how the "air bearing" design works:
https://ip.sandia.gov/techpdfs/Sandi...s%20Market.pdf
Quote:
Q: Is the thermal resistance of the air gap region large enough to be a problem?
A: no—for example, in our current prototype device the thermal resistance of the air gap region is 0.02 °C/W.
|
They do mention in the video, that initially there was a lot of scepticism about the design and since the very same question is the first in the FAQ section, you're probably not the first one to point it out
It is important to understand that it's not someones brainfart they hacked together in a weekend on the off change that it might work. It is a result of years of complex fluid-dynamics modelling, trying hundreds of different designs, finding one that does work the best in the models. Without any prototypes scepticism might be well founded ... but rototypes have been built and the modelling IS backed up by experimental data.
By June they had at least 2 licencees to the design (one in CPU cooling). wouldn't you think that CPU cooler companies don't simply throw money away on revolutionary (and iffy) designs before seeing hard, real-life data to back them up ?
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 06:53 AM
|
#160
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 671
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkadrel
https://techportal.eere.energy.gov/t....do/techID=527
Whats not said is that they have a prototype, thats abit over 10cm in diameter, that funktions at 0.2C/W. And they believe they might reach as low as 0.1C/W.
The fact that its 10 times smaller, can cool better than most air coolers, and use less power to do so? It almost seems to good to be true.
All this time.... fans blowing air on some metal fins... when its apperntly much more effective to just spin the cooling fins around through the air (instead of the otherway around) 
|
... I am not quite sure I see this happening .. or its claimed effectiveness.
__________________
Quote:
Please dont deal in absolutes.
Everything in the verse is percentages. Everything.
-With the exception of the love for our children.
(cytg 2001)
|
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:32 AM
|
#161
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,482
|
Well, you gotta admit, in our current coolers, the potential of the plastic fan is untapped.
I mean we have plastic spinning fans that do not transfer any heat from themselves, they just push air toward a stationary heatsink.
But what if the plastic fan was instead metal, and could help transfer heat from itself (if thermally interfacing the heat source)? That's a huge potential, and this Sandia design captures that potential.
That's a big deal.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 09:38 AM
|
#162
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,007
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingFatty
Well, you gotta admit, in our current coolers, the potential of the plastic fan is untapped.
I mean we have plastic spinning fans that do not transfer any heat from themselves, they just push air toward a stationary heatsink.
But what if the plastic fan was instead metal, and could help transfer heat from itself (if thermally interfacing the heat source)? That's a huge potential, and this Sandia design captures that potential.
That's a big deal.
|
I don't think it's quite as simple as making the fan metal instead of plastic.
Instead of pushing air past stationary fins, the sandia cooler is using rotational acceleration to decrease the "dead air gap" (as it is described in the video), and the the fins being shaped into an impeller pulls in cooler air to improve heat transfer. None of that would happen if you just took a HSF and make the fan metal.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 10:12 AM
|
#163
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keysplayr
You're 100% correct. I didn't. Just by looking at it screams poor heat transfer from semi to heatsink.
The lubricant is air? Even worse. What happens when there are air gaps between heatsink and heatshield in today's heatsink applications?
|
I'm wth you, I just don't see it working as advertised.
I don't have time to read up on it now, but what happens as dust builds up on the fins? Will that throw it off balance enough that it wobbles, just a bit, and the .001 does become an issue?
I guess we'll have to wait and see if anything comes of this, but it has some problems in my mind.
__________________
Steve
PhII 1090T @ 4.03GHz/2.6GHz NB/L3, MSI K9A2 Platinum, 8GB DDR2 @ 866MHz, Radeon 7970 @ 1025/1400, 120GB Intel 320 SSD, ABS-Tagan BZ900
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 11:31 AM
|
#164
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,482
|
After watching the video, I didn't like how the dust issue was dismissed with "it will be flung off." We all know how our current fans are spinning and they still collect dust on them.
I guess it makes sense that the weight of the dust is negligible compared to the weight of the spinning heavy impeller, so even if the dust build-up causes lop-sided weight, the impeller won't really notice or get thrown off (and the air bearing is probably immune to wobble, the bearing holds the tolerance, not the other way around and I think that non-intuitiveness is throwing-off a lot of readers who think the precise tolerance is needed for the bearing, that's backwards). Anyway, it also seems reasonable that dust will build-up on the impeller symmetrically so it's still a non-issue of dust build up. But why didn't they mention these things instead of dismissing dust?
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:00 PM
|
#165
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MustangSVT
Did people take physics? its amazing how many think this will work.
This won't work better than current heatsink + fan system. Both in cost and performance.
The main issue is of course the part where blades meet the surface. Or simply, how the heat is effectively transferred. ANY gap and it will be worthless, too much friction requires other details that just isn't cost effective at all. not even close.
NEXT!.
|
too much friction and one might end up with a heater
from the link it looks like .... nonsense....tbh.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 12:04 PM
|
#166
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
|
Last edited by 9enesis; 11-05-2012 at 12:09 PM.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 03:36 PM
|
#167
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 357
|
Just because you can't figure out how it works based on your high school physics background doesn't mean that it doesn't work.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 03:54 PM
|
#168
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hubb1e
Just because you can't figure out how it works based on your high school physics background doesn't mean that it doesn't work.
|
did you address this to me?
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 04:08 PM
|
#169
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keysplayr
You're 100% correct. I didn't. Just by looking at it screams poor heat transfer from semi to heatsink.
The lubricant is air? Even worse. What happens when there are air gaps between heatsink and heatshield in today's heatsink applications?
|
Sometimes things aren't always as they seem?
Do the math, then tell us whether it sucks or not.
|
|
|
11-05-2012, 04:23 PM
|
#170
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haserath
Sometimes things aren't always as they seem?
Do the math, then tell us whether it sucks or not.
|
Well, the issue is heat transfer, straight up. Did anyone pick up on the "dust won't stick to this because it's moving so fast" comment? That's complete BS, it WILL get dust on it, in use and more than that, when off. What happens if dust gets into that air gap? Lab testing is one thing, real world performance is another.
__________________
i7 3770k @ 4.4GHz | 16GB RAM | MSI Z77 GD65 | eVGA GTX580 | Samsung 840 Pro | Intel 510 250GB | Crucial M4 128GB | ASUS Xonar STX
Nikon D7000 | 18-200mm VR | 70-300mm f/4-5.6 FX | 35mm f/1.8 prime | Tokina 11-16 Wide angle
|
|
|
02-21-2013, 06:13 PM
|
#171
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 113
|
No one is going to believe this but yesterday I had this very same exact idea... and then today I was doing a search related to cleaning the inside of a pc and just randomly came across this....
|
|
|
02-24-2013, 03:22 AM
|
#172
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
|
it's still vaporware. i wonder what will be out first: the commercial application of this, or Duke Nuke'm Forever...
__________________
Jesus Saves. The rest of you take 2d10 Fire Damage.
Rig:
E8400 @ 3.6GHz / Noctua NH-C14 | GA-P43-DS3L | Sapphire HD5850 1GB @ 900/1125 | 4GB DDR2-800 OCZ | Samsung S23A700D 120Hz | Tagan SuperRock 500W
|
|
|
02-24-2013, 05:04 AM
|
#173
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,641
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borealis7
it's still vaporware. i wonder what will be out first: the commercial application of this, or Duke Nuke'm Forever...
|
Erm. Duke Nukem Forever came out already.
__________________
Main rig Phenom II X4 960T, 4GB DDR2, XFX HD 7770
Old skool 2 x 3GHz Xeon (Hyperthreaded), 2GB RDRAM, HIS AGP HD4670
|
|
|
02-24-2013, 05:13 AM
|
#174
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,219
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borealis7
it's still vaporware. i wonder what will be out first: the commercial application of this, or Duke Nuke'm Forever...
|
Duke Nukem Forever WAS released. Didn't you get the memo?
__________________
Rig(s) not listed, because I change computers, like some people change their socks.
|
|
|
02-24-2013, 06:33 AM
|
#175
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,760
|
the factory called, NTMBK and VirtualLarry models are being recalled to get their humor upgraded.
__________________
Jesus Saves. The rest of you take 2d10 Fire Damage.
Rig:
E8400 @ 3.6GHz / Noctua NH-C14 | GA-P43-DS3L | Sapphire HD5850 1GB @ 900/1125 | 4GB DDR2-800 OCZ | Samsung S23A700D 120Hz | Tagan SuperRock 500W
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.
|