|
|
 |
11-19-2011, 11:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: True North
Posts: 3,649
|
Changes to bigadv coming Jan 16
The minimum requirement will be 16 cores (or threads) and the deadlines will be shortened as well. So if you're planning any upgrades keep this in mind.
http://folding.typepad.com/news/2011...y-16-2012.html
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 12:10 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 951
|
While I don't participate in the F@H, those minimum requirements are ridiculous. That would just about force everyone with a rig(s) older than six months to upgrade. Then again it is experimental, so I can see the why for the upgrade.
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 03:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: True North
Posts: 3,649
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by somethingsketchy
While I don't participate in the F@H, those minimum requirements are ridiculous.
|
There are no changes for the requirements for other F@H WU and those still need to be done. The SMP WUs are being ignored in favor of the bigadv for higher PPD, but the bigadv were never intended to be run on regular consumer level hardware.
Quote:
|
That would just about force everyone with a rig(s) older than six months to upgrade.
|
Actually anyone with only a single CPU (except possibly a 16 core BD, I don't know what frame times they get) would be forced to upgrade.
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 03:13 PM
|
#4
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 22,437
|
Lame. You would think that they would want the participation of people with Nehalem i7s and SB 2600Ks, but not, they want to shun them, and lump them back in with the SMP guys.
__________________
Rig(s) not listed, because I change computers, like some people change their socks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phucheneh
ATX is for poor people. And 'gamers.'
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aigomorla
haswell is bulldozer...
|
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 03:36 PM
|
#5
|
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,171
|
Technically, from what I’ve read, we (I7, SB2600K) aren’t supposed to be able to run the –bigadv work units in the first place. It is only because the client can’t tell eight physical cores from 4 cores+4 threads, or eight spoofed cores………….. I felt as tho I had hit the jackpot when my computer(s) ran bigadv work units despite not meeting spec.s.
Look on the bright side: they aren’t making the change until after the holiday race………
I say let's try to run them out of work units.............
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 03:50 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokey
Technically, from what I’ve read, we (I7, SB2600K) aren’t supposed to be able to run the –bigadv work units in the first place. It is only because the client can’t tell eight physical cores from 4 cores+4 threads, or eight spoofed cores………….. I felt as tho I had hit the jackpot when my computer(s) ran bigadv work units despite not meeting spec.s.
|
Though in that case (if the project managers didn't want consumer hardware running -bigadv), I wonder why they had released a GPU client for consumer level GPUs? I expected Quadro or Tesla cards to be in full force.
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 10:02 PM
|
#7
|
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,027
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirtualLarry
You would think that they would want the participation of people with Nehalem i7s and SB 2600Ks, but not, they want to shun them, and lump them back in with the SMP guys.
|
I would guess the opposite, that -bigadv is slowing down and the few 16+ core rigs will be able to handle the load and that they need the speed of the i7 and SBs on more important SMP projects.
__________________
Remember to spend time with loved ones.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 07:44 PM
|
#8
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minsk, Belarus or Utah, USA
Posts: 3,012
|
All I can say is that I am dissapointed. Why not make another client and keep the current client alive???
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 11:31 PM
|
#9
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: True North
Posts: 3,649
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by somethingsketchy
Though in that case (if the project managers didn't want consumer hardware running -bigadv), I wonder why they had released a GPU client for consumer level GPUs? I expected Quadro or Tesla cards to be in full force.
|
AFAIK there is no difference for F@H with Quadro or Tesla compared to regular video cards, the thing that matters most is number of shaders and shader clock.
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 10:43 AM
|
#10
|
|
Golden Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 1,097
|
Good thing I didn't invest into a 2600k rig as I was thinking of building another bigadv rig for the race. I can understand the need (and from what I read, a fairly sizeable backlog) to crunch regular SMP WUs though.
I haven't decided what I will do next. I may focus more on BOINC biology projects like WCG and Correlizer.
__________________
PLAY, WORK & CRUNCH
(1) i7 3770K @ 4.2 GHz | 7950 @ 1000/1300 MHz (2) i7 2600K @ 4.2 GHz | GTX 580 @ 850/1700/1050 MHz (3) i7 950 @ 4.0 GHz | 7870 @ 1100/1500 MHz
CRUNCH
(1) i5 2500K @ 4.3 GHz | GT 240 (2) i7 970 @ 3.9 GHz | GTX 480 @ 775/1550/924 MHz (3) Q9550 @ 3.4 GHz | 5850 @ 900/1250 MHz (4) X6 1055T @ 3.5 GHz | 2 x GTX 460 @ 825/1650/900 MHz
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 01:44 PM
|
#11
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: True North
Posts: 3,649
|
The first new units are out in beta, but the points are ridiculously low at this time. If anyone else is still folding bigadv on the TeAm make sure you don't use the -bigbeta flag.
http://folding.typepad.com/news/2012...v-rollout.html
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 09:34 PM
|
#12
|
|
Diamond Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blaine, MN
Posts: 6,587
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theAnimal
|
Bleh.
Well, my big folders have all moved on anyway, so while I am unaffected at this time, I am bummed. So much for that quad G34 Piledriver for Christmas
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.
|